Steve Randy Waldman says stop shopping and start saving, people

The always-thought-provoking Steve Randy Waldman, inspired by that Paul McCulley piece I cited last week on “the paradox of deleveraging,” writes:

Encouraging people to go shopping in order to help the economy is not “second best” policy. It’s a desperate last resort. We’re not at a point where there’s so little economic activity that we can’t foresee future wants. We’re at a point where people are beginning to shift from investment to storage because of a well-deserved loss of confidence in the financial system. Encouraging consumption now is nihilistic. It feeds into a vibe (I feel it personally, do you?) that saving is so uncertain and money so volatile that one might as well spend, ‘cuz who knows what tomorrow might bring. The right way to sustain aggregate demand and maintain current income is to figure out what we should be investing in — not stocks, bonds, or CDOs, but factories, windmills, or schools — and then to put current resources to work. Our financial system is failing spectacularly because it erred grievously. It built homes and roads and sewers that oughtn’t have been built, it “invested” in vacations and plasma televisions, and it paid itself handsomely for doing so. That’s not a problem we can spend our way out of. To fix the financial system we have to change it, not rally to its support. We will know we’ve put things right when thrift is something we can celebrate, when we save because we are excited about what we are creating rather than frightened by what we might lose.

Agreed. I think the issue for McCulley (and for me) is that we don’t want to make that shift to thrift all at once. Although of course the danger is that this can be an excuse for never making the shift until modern financial capitalism falls apart completely and we’re all stuck foraging for grubs.

Oh, and about those sewers: I’m figuring that’s a reference to Jefferson County, Ala., which may be headed for bankruptcy thanks to massive sewer-related debts. Those sewer improvements themselves weren’t a waste–I think I wrote the very first article for The Birmingham News pointing out, in 1992 or so, that every time it rained hard (which it does a lot in Jefferson County) huge quantities of raw sewage were pouring into creeks and rivers in and around Birmingham. The problem was the fancy-pants refinancing, urged on by some naughty bankers at JP Morgan and elsewhere in 2002, that blew up on the county when credit markets began to go haywire last year.

Sewers: good. Wall Street: very, very naughty.

Related Topics: Economy & Policy
  • Latest on Business

    David Paul Morris / Bloomberg via Getty Images

    Working the Room at Facebook’s Times Square Party

    Hey! Where is everyone?

    I headed to Nasdaq headquarters in Times Square, ground zero of the biggest high tech stock offering ever, where Facebook would be welcomed into the arms of the investing public. And all I found was a bunch of CNBC cameras.

    Why Greece Isn't Leaving the Eurozone YetSlate

    Getty Images

    The Creepy Dudes of Wall Street: Are Finance Guys Losing Their Mojo on the Dating Scene, Too?

    It’s tough to tell when an internet phenomenon reaches actual meme status. But, in the case of the “creepy finance guy,” I think we can finally call it.

    This week saw yet another jaw-dropping tale of Wall Street prattishness, this time in the form of a post-date survey. Yep, a finance dude went on a date with a lady. And then he asked her for constructive feedback.

  • Independent

    “The problem was the fancy-pants refinancing, urged on by some naughty bankers at JP Morgan and elsewhere in 2002, that blew up on the county when credit markets began to go haywire last year.

    Sewers: good. Wall Street: very, very naughty.”

    “The first thing we do, let’s kill all the bankers.” Isn’t that what Shakespeare wrote?

  • MBirchmeier

    “The right way to sustain aggregate demand and maintain current income is to figure out what we should be investing in — not stocks, bonds, or CDOs, but factories, windmills, or schools — and then to put current resources to work.”

    How does one effectively support factories, windmills or schools, without buying stocks, bonds or CDOs (I suppose a donation, but that’s not exactly what one is likely to be doing in a recession)?

    I’ve never understood the idea of (personal) spending our way out of a recession, rather shouldn’t we always be encouraging responsible infrastructure spending as a primary measure rather than a secondary one?

    -MBirchmeier

  • TomT

    Very interesting post.

    It’s interesting that the naughty bankers are getting bailed out while Jefferson County isn’t.

    I guess the old saying should be “first, bail out all the bankers.”

  • Curmudgeon

    I’d rather let the market decide what to invest in; I can’t imagine anyone in a leadership role making a good decision there (bridge to nowhere in Alaska, anyone?). But I wish that tax policies weren’t tilted so far in favor of consumption.

  • odograph

    I don’t think there is any danger that Americans will start saving too much or all at once.

    My favorite snippet today is about the way they “downsize” on cars:

    Car Buyers Downsize, but Spend Big on Options”

    “Now people of all income levels are buying small cars to pinch pennies at the gas pump, but they are not scrimping on creature comforts. Instead, they are spending hundreds or even thousands of dollars on options, like heated leather seats and high-end entertainment systems, usually found in luxury cars.”

    “If you do the math, financially it’s not worth it,” Mr. Schafer said. “But we figured if we buy something that’s small and fun we can achieve some gas savings. It just kills me personally when I take a ride by myself and I’m getting 10 miles to the gallon and I have nothing in the back.”

    http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/17/business/17compact.html

    … after being told so many times that the Prius “hybrid option” didn’t pay for itself it’s pretty funny.

    Just the same, these folks are bringing down the national fleet MPG, even if they are (typically for Americans) overspending on some things (heated leather seats) and less on others (that hybrid option).

  • Tan Boon Tee

    Goodness gracious, I hear a familiar echo.

    I have expressed similar views before in the letter columns of TIME, Newsweek, Forbes and Fortune. The Americans can ill afford to keep purchasing inessential items (buying for the sake of buying) and just store them for good, burning away money without any second thought. They ought not to continue unrelentingly in wasting food and energy, or spending blindly in lavish leisure and long vacations.

    It is time to learn the good virtue of thrift and living a simpler life style (for a better future of yourself and your country).

blog comments powered by Disqus