The Fannie-Freddie government guarantee ceases to be implicit

The Federal Reserve announced Sunday that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac can borrow money from it if they need to. Then the Treasury Department said it’s going to ask Congress for permission both to increase its credit line to the two giant mortgage lenders and to buy stock in them if necessary to shore up their capital base.

You could call it the nationalization of our mortgage lending system, with the caveat that it already was effectively nationalized: Fannie and Freddie were both created by Congress and long enjoyed the assumption among investors that the U.S. government would spring in if they ever ran into trouble–even though all the debt securities they issued came with the warning that they were “not guaranteed by the United States.” Maybe from now on they’ll say something like “not guaranteed by the United States, unless they really need to be.”

With Bear Stearns, the Fed’s decision to jump in and avoid an unruly collapse was something of a judgment call. One can argue that it’s possible things would have turned out okay if Bear had simply been allowed to fail. With Fannie and Freddie there’s really no such argument. At the moment they are the U.S. mortgage market. Reports the WSJ:

Some officials at the White House are believed to have preferred a tough-love approach. Under one option, according to people familiar with the outlines of policy discussions within the administration, the White House could try to install a new slate of presidentially appointed board members at the companies. The idea would be to impose more market discipline on the two companies, to curb their appetites for borrowing and investing, and to gradually shrink their enormous balance sheets.

In the past, that’s proved hard for the government to do, because of the companies’ relatively weak regulator and their perceived financial backing from the federal government, which allows them to borrow easily, at low cost. But as the housing market has worsened in recent months, Congress and the administration have come to depend even more on Fannie and Freddie. Reducing the two companies’ ability to fund mortgages could hurt the housing market further, and delay recovery.

It’s a quandary. Taxpayers are now on the line for a scary amount of mortgage debt (Fannie and Freddie together own or guarantee $5.5 trillion in loans). But as I wrote Friday, you really can’t blame Fannie and Freddie for the housing bubble and bust–the subprime lending boom that created the mess was mostly funded by Wall Street firms and private investors. And keeping the two lenders not just alive but aggressively buying new mortgages seems essential to keeping the housing downturn from accelerating into an all-out collapse.

Related Topics: Economy & Policy
  • Latest on Business

    Associated Press

    Apple CEO Cook Gives Up $75M in Stock Dividends

    NEW YORK — Apple CEO Tim Cook is giving up $75 million in dividends on restricted stock that the company is awarding to all of its employees.

    In a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission on Thursday, Apple Inc. said that Cook requested that his restricted stock units not receive dividends. The dividends that Apple workers are getting amount to $2.65 per quarter for each restricted stock unit held. The shares are not normally eligible to receive dividends, so Apple’s decision is a perk for its employees.

    The Bomb Hidden in Mitt Romney's Education PlanSlate

    Associated Press

    Study: Typical CEO Pay Up 6% to $9.6 Million

    NEW YORK — Profits at big U.S. companies broke records last year, and so did pay for CEOs.

    The head of a typical public company made $9.6 million in 2011, according to an analysis by The Associated Press using data from Equilar, an executive pay research firm.

  • Tan Boon Tee

    In short, all you are trying to tell the world is the US government has decided to bail the two gigantic mortgage lenders out of their trouble. It is a must (there could be no other tangible option), as they were both the babies of Congress.

    Whether one likes it or not, 5.5 trillion dollars are at stake. If this mind-boggling amount is not scary, what else is? Does anyone want to believe that keeping the colossal lenders alive would help to avoid the imminent financial collapse?

    Some people are still behaving like an ostrich, pretending to be totally oblivious to the real scenario. When will they pull the heads out of the sand?
    (Tan Boon Tee)

blog comments powered by Disqus