Sarah Lacy, Mark Zuckerberg and the Most Important Story in the Whole World

I’m afraid that I’ve let distractions like Emperor’s Club Client 9 and the Fed’s new Term Securities Lending Facility keep me from writing until now about the Most Important Story in the Whole World–journalist Sarah Lacy‘s troubled Q&A with Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg at the SXSW Interactive Conference Sunday.

It started with a bunch of disgruntled Twitters during the Q&A. Then came catcalls from the audience, some awkward fight-back by Lacy and, afterwards, a cataclysmic flood of blogospheric recrimination about Lacy’s hair-twirling, among other things, followed by defenses from heavyweights Michael Arrington, Owen Thomas, and Kara Swisher. There’s no self-involvement like Silicon Valley self-involvement, eh?

I initially learned about this epoch-making event from a CNet story that showed up in my e-mail inbox. My first thought was that tech journalists do sometimes get very big for their britches very quickly, and maybe Lacy (she used to write for Business Week and now has a videoblog on Yahoo! Finance and a book coming out in May about the rebirth of Silicon Valley; plus, Nick Denton thinks she’s “smoking” hot) had committed the great moderator sin of talking about herself too much.

But then I started watching the video of the event made by Facebook obsessive Nick O’Neill. Lacy seemed to start off really well, with quick, smart questions and very little bloviation. It was only much, much later that she ran into trouble. Thirty-nine minutes later (no, I didn’t watch all 39; I relied on the helpful annotations along the bottom of the video to guide my viewing).

Which explains the problem right there: That is way, way too long for any audience–especially an audience heavy on bloggers and others who think their opinions are really really important–to sit and listen to some journalist ask a guy questions. I do the occasional panel-moderating gig myself, and I generally think the cutoff should be at about 15-20 minutes, after which you move to questions from the audience. If not sooner.

Now I guess Lacy should have realized this, but I’d put most of the blame on the organizers of the event for not making that an explicit part of the format. I don’t know of any interviewer on the planet who could keep an hour-long stage interview engaging without some kind of audience interaction. So take heart, Sarah Lacy: Oriana Fallaci would have gotten catcalls at SXSW, too.

Related Topics: Economy & Policy
  • Latest on Business

    Associated Press

    Apple CEO Cook Gives Up $75M in Stock Dividends

    NEW YORK — Apple CEO Tim Cook is giving up $75 million in dividends on restricted stock that the company is awarding to all of its employees.

    In a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission on Thursday, Apple Inc. said that Cook requested that his restricted stock units not receive dividends. The dividends that Apple workers are getting amount to $2.65 per quarter for each restricted stock unit held. The shares are not normally eligible to receive dividends, so Apple’s decision is a perk for its employees.

    The Bomb Hidden in Mitt Romney's Education PlanSlate

    Associated Press

    Study: Typical CEO Pay Up 6% to $9.6 Million

    NEW YORK — Profits at big U.S. companies broke records last year, and so did pay for CEOs.

    The head of a typical public company made $9.6 million in 2011, according to an analysis by The Associated Press using data from Equilar, an executive pay research firm.

  • rrsafety

    thanks for the re-cap. I missed the original blogsplosion on that…. great story… LOL

  • Greg Berry

    There are great interviewers out there who can carry a discussion much longer than 15 – 20 minutes. Charlie Rose. Bryant Gumbel. Bob Costas. … heh.

    But what about your buddy David Kirkpatrick? He’s a really solid interviewer who could have carried the Zuck interview quite well, IMHO.

    I think the real point of the story is the active backchannel that now exists at most conferences. If you team a self-important moderator (I don’t know Lacy enough to judge this myself, but so go the reports) with conference organizers who are not embracing the backchannel, well, you’ll get something like what happened at SXSW.

blog comments powered by Disqus