Despite Mixed Headlines, Today’s Jobs Report is Still a Bummer

  • Share
  • Read Later
Rick Bowmer / AP

The October jobs report came as a bit of surprise for analysts who were expecting the government shutdown to severely affect job growth, as the Labor Department announced the economy added a pretty robust 204,000 new jobs in October. That’s on top of upward revisions of job-growth estimates in September and August, which showed the economy supported 60,000 more jobs than previously thought.

These headline numbers can be a bit misleading however, and there are numbers deeper in the report that suggest that the shutdown had a pretty significant effect on the economy and employment. Furthermore, there’s plenty of evidence that shows that shutdown or no, the labor market simply isn’t recovering from the biggest issues facing it today.

What were the most worrying indicators? Though the unemployment rate has fallen quickly over the past couple years, much of that decline is due to workers dropping out of the labor force altogether. That trend continued with this report, as the labor force participation rate declined by 0.4% to the lowest level since 1978:

US Labor Force Participation Rate Chart

US Labor Force Participation Rate data by YCharts

Another related figure to keep an eye on is the employment-population ratio. This can be a more informative measure of the labor market than the unemployment rate because it ignores the question of whether someone should be considered in or out of the labor market. Though we should generally expect this to decline as our workforce continues to age overall and a greater share of our population is retired, older folks, you can see in the chart below that we’re a long way from recovering from a decline in this number that was clearly a result of the financial crisis. This number also fell in today’s report.

US Employment-population Ratio Chart

US Employment-population Ratio data by YCharts

It’s quite possible that the bad news contained in these metrics will reverse in the November survey once the Labor Department is conducting its survey under normal conditions and federal workers and contractors are all back on the job. But it’s also possible that the second-order economic effects of the shutdown haven’t even been picked up in the data yet. Here’s economist and Brookings Institution Senior Fellow Justin Wolfers on Twitter this morning:

Lastly, when you take a step back and look at the long-term trends employment trends in the economy, we’re simply not adding enough jobs to get the economy back to full strength any time soon. So far this year, we’ve seen an average of roughly 186,000 new jobs per month. We averaged 175,000 and 182,000 jobs per month in 2011 and 2012 respectively. If the pace of job growth is accelerating at all, it’s doing so only very slightly.

Four years into the recovery, we’re sill more than 1.5 million jobs short of peak jobs in 2008, and that’s after years of population growth. Adding more than 200,000 jobs in any given month is pretty good news, but any sober look at the bigger picture says it’s nowhere near good enough.

12 comments
issam-ibrahim
issam-ibrahim

Por último, cuando das un paso atrás y mirar las tendencias a largo plazo la evolución del empleo en la economía, estamos simplemente no añadir suficientes puestos de trabajo para que la economía de nuevo a toda su fuerza en el corto plazo. En lo que va de este año, hemos visto un promedio de alrededor de 186.000 nuevos puestos de trabajo al mes. Tenemos un promedio de 175.000 y 182.000 puestos de trabajo al mes en 2011 y 2012 respectivamente. Read more: https://twitter.com/alaamiah Si el ritmo de crecimiento del empleo se está acelerando en todos, que está haciendo lo que sólo muy ligeramente.

Whatanotion
Whatanotion

If we don't need government then we don't need to pay rent too; right?    When the money in the bank has your grandchildren hypnotized into not thinking they need an education because after all you're rich and you have guns;  the system has failed you.  At this point Karl Marx wins.   

KristinScott20
KristinScott20

<!-- I simply got paid $9000 operating off my laptop computer this month. And if you're thinking that it is cool, and you also want to earn money then you are on the right way just go to this site for amazing details..........>

u48.o-->

sirprzemyslaw
sirprzemyslaw

To avoid unemployment, actually go to college to study something in which the skill sets attained are in high demand by employers and society. Schools should foster an aptitude and love in children for problem-solving that will indubitably be useful in the future. There will always be a high demand for competent employees to solve problems in technology and the economy, so stop blaming and start learning and taking action.

barneydidit
barneydidit

Quick! Tea Party members of The House...we NEED your leadership...can we get a 42nd futile effort to repeal Obamacare out of you?  The first 41 tries apparently didn't jump start the economy like we were hoping. 

mary.waterton
mary.waterton

Jobs don't matter when your central bank is printing TRILLIONS and buying up TRILLIONS in Government debt ............. and it won't matter until the poo hits the fan.

tom.litton
tom.litton

@robbyzheng What Josh said +

People who had skills that were in high demand at one point, but got laid off and found those skills are no longer marketable.

JoshSoffer
JoshSoffer

@robbyzheng I don't think the problem is middle class students at Tufts majoring in English rather than computer science. It's parents who can't afford a decent education for their kids. It's teachers who aren't adequately trained(as the leadership of colleges of education  have recently admitted). It's businesses who consider labor as a commodity rather than a partner in the company, and so under-employ and underpay..

manapp99
manapp99

@barneydidit The reason the repeal efforts did not jump start the economy is that Senate Dems blocked the effort. We cannot know if repeal would have been good for the country as it did not happen. We do know that the ACA is a disaster as it did happen. Stick with reality and it will become much clearer for you. 

tom.litton
tom.litton

@mary.waterton You realize they do that in an effort to reduce unemployment (ie create jobs) right?

While it's true that it hasn't helped very much (although it likely helps some), it's also true it hasn't done any harm (ie, hasn't cost any jobs).  But it's also the only thing that they can do to help.

JoshSoffer
JoshSoffer

@mary.watertonHi Mary, this is my favorite coment from you:

"I never met an atheist who actually was an atheist ... just people who hate God and symbolically stick their middle fingers in His face by ignoring His existence."



tom.litton
tom.litton

@manapp99 @barneydidit That explains why they did it the first time.  What about the other 40 times?  Or are you saying that repealing Obamacare is the only thing they can be doing to help the economy?