As the Dow Soars, How High Can Tech Stocks Go?

Brendan McDermid / REUTERS

A man takes a photo outside the Nasdaq Market site in New York's Times Square, July 23, 2012.

Last Friday, the Dow Jones Industrial Average — the benchmark stock index of America’s blue chip companies – closed above 14,000 for the first time since the financial meltdown sent the U.S. economy into the worst crisis in decades. The continued resurgence of the U.S. auto industry and growing optimism about the overall economy helped propel the Dow above the psychologically important 14,000 point level. The surging Dow is an indication of the increasing financial health of the largest American companies, a bright spot in an otherwise shaky U.S. economic recovery, particularly with respect to unemployment.

America’s blue chip firms — including industrial giants, banks, and auto companies — are healthier than they’ve been in years. But what about the largest U.S. tech companies? Like the other major stock indices, the tech-heavy Nasdaq index is at or near multi-year highs. On Friday alone, the Nasdaq rose 1%, nearly touching the index’s five-year high, which it hit last September, driven in part by tech juggernaut Apple, which had just released the iPhone 5. But Wall Street sentiment has soured on Apple in recent months, somewhat tempering the Nasdaq’s continued ascent.

(MOREApple Shares Plunge 10% on Slowing Growth, New Product Jitters)

How high can tech stocks go? Given Apple’s size — it’s the largest tech company in the world — it makes sense to begin any forward-looking evaluation of the Nasdaq with the Cupertino, Calif.-based cash machine. Apple constitutes about 12% of the Nasdaq’s valuation, and there’s no question the company’s recent stock swoon has placed a drag on the tech-heavy index. Let’s take a look at Apple and three other important Nasdaq companies.

Two weeks ago, for the third consecutive quarter, Apple fell short of analyst estimates, sending the company’s stock down 10% in after-hours trading, wiping out nearly $50 billion in shareholder value. Although it reported record financial results, Apple’s slowing growth rate has spooked investors, who are growing increasingly concerned about the next stage in the company’s epic story.

Can Apple maintain its heretofore astonishing growth-rate on the back of existing products like the iPhone and the iPad or does the company need new, breakthrough products? Investors seem to think the latter, which explains why its stock has declined 26% over the last six months. As the largest single component of the Nasdaq index, Apple’s continued growth is crucial for the tech-heavy stock tracker.

(MOREGoogle and IBM Post Strong Earnings as the Tech Sector Heats Up)

If there’s a true standout among big tech stocks, it’s clearly Internet titan Google, which hit a record high on Friday, closing up 2.6% to $775.60, the highest value since the company went public in August 2004, according to Bloomberg. As rival Apple has stumbled, Google shares have increased 30% over the last year. Google now has a market capitalization of $250 billion, with $50 billion cash on hand. Not bad for a 15-year-old academic project.

Last month, Google reported strong revenue growth, as the online advertising market keeps shifting away from traditional ad platforms — including print — and toward Internet-based marketing. This trend will continue indefinitely, and as the world’s largest Internet advertising company, Google is perfectly poised to capitalize here.

Another bright spot for the Nasdaq is social media colossus Facebook. After a rough few months following the company’s controversial initial public offering, Facebook shares have soared over 30% in the last three months. Last month, Facebook delivered a strong earnings report, with mobile revenue surging from 0% to 23% of total revenue in just one year. That’s another figure that will only increase.

(MOREFacebook ‘Friends’ Apple and Takes a Shot at Google)

“Today there is no argument,” Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg told Wall Street analysts. “Facebook is a mobile company.” The company’s overall ad sales growth is booming, increasing in the fourth quarter by 41% to $1.3 billion. As the largest of the new class of Nasdaq’s stocks, Facebook’s continued success is crucial for the tech-heavy index, which endured withering criticism of its handling of the IPO.

If the Nasdaq has a compelling underdog story right now, it’s a company called Blackberry, formerly known as Research in Motion. (Why it took so many years for the company to make this obvious branding change is beyond me.) Practically left for dead just six months ago, Blackberry is up a whopping 49.6% over the last three months. Last week, Blackberry unveiled its long-awaited Blackberry 10 operating system, and unveiled two slick-looking new Blackberry phones.

Taking several pages from the Apple/Google playbook, Blackberry announced a marketplace for music and movies, and an app catalog that will include more than 70,000 apps at launch, as TIME’s Techland reported. Blackberry shares are still down over 80% since their 2008 peak, but if the company can launch a product that genuinely competes with Apple and Google, that will be good for the tech sector, because competition spurs innovation, and innovation drives the Nasdaq.

(MOREAll New Blackberry: Z10 and Q10 Smartphones Announced)

It’s important to remember that the health of stock market indices does not necessarily correspond with the overall health of the U.S. economy. In fact, there’s frequently little connection at all. Stock markets are driven by corporate profits, which seem increasingly disconnected from the health of the U.S. consumer, a key driver of the economy. Still, rising corporate revenues, profits, and stock prices are an unambiguously good sign for the U.S. economy. And tech companies are a key element of overall U.S. corporate health.

What drives tech revenues and profits? Consumer and corporate spending. There’s no doubt that investors have grown skittish about Apple, which is weighing on the Nasdaq. But overall, U.S. stock market indices and other key economic measures appear to be contributing to a virtuous cycle — however halting — that will ultimately benefit investors.

16 comments
JamesKong
JamesKong

Why Blackberry's turnaround might not last! correlatedvolatility.blogspot.com

famulla5
famulla5

One of the joys in a life filled with many is the opportunity I’ve had to meet people of different nationalities and faiths. Sometimes people in their own country, and sometimes when both parties are expatriate, in a country to which neither truly belongs. The mixture of languages, customs and opinions can on occasion cause great mirth.

The mix can also be cause for great insult and misunderstanding, often quite unwittingly, which can translate into lost opportunities, both social and financial. The reason, possibly, those entities encouraging intercultural exchange and study are gaining credibility. Why the multinational companies are spending dollars and dinars on training for their expatriates whether east to west or north to south and all routes between.

In order to reach agreement and a comfortable understanding between peoples, faiths and countries compromise must surely become part of the international lexicon.

“Come on honey, eat your lunch up and then you can go outside and play,” or variations on that theme are played out in homes around the world, no matter the language or culture. It is the start of our children learning the art of compromise, or bargaining to use the grubbier term. I thank you Firozali A.Mulla DBA

famulla5
famulla5

This is a manipulated economy - manipulated by the Fed, the Treasury, foreign central banks, etc.  All the economic statistics an investor might use to make decisions are deliberately distorted to keep the stock market from falling and thereby keep 'extremists' (anyone who's not a Rep or Dem) out of government.  The average 'investor' ought not to be one.   Bonds, stocks, commodities, forget it.  Put your money in a short term low-risk money market fund or just put cash in your safe - put about 15% in gold - just in case.  Other than that, I'm staying out while Bernanke 'runs' the Fed.  Let Wall Street claim other people's money - not mine. or yours. I thank you FirozaliA.Mulla DBA

famulla5
famulla5

The Most Dangerous Sentence in Obama’s Second Inaugural

In an otherwise unmemorable second inaugural speech, I was struck by one sentence: "But we are also heirs to those who won the peace and not just the war, who turned sworn enemies into the surest of friends, and we must carry those lessons into this time as well."

Two points: First, our forebears were only able to "win the peace" because they first crushed our enemies in war. But under President Obama we're not committed to winning our wars. We're committed to ending them. Does Obama really think we're going to win the peace after not winning the war?

Second, think about the formulation—"and not just." Surely President Obama should have said this: "we are also heirs to those who won the peace as well as the war..." But he didn't say that. The formulation Obama chose—"and not just the war"—suggests that Obama believes that it's no big deal to win a war, and the greater achievement is winning the peace. With respect to World War II, this view is ludicrous. With respect to today's world, this view is dangerous. I thank you FirozaliA.Mulla DBA


famulla5
famulla5

The woman who still could be the next defense secretary, Michele Flournoy, has an intelligent op-ed, well worth reading, in today’s Wall Street Journal, on "The Right Way to Cut Pentagon Spending." If we're to have a defense secretary who acquiesces in cutting defense (and we will while Barack Obama is president), Flournoy's article suggests the cuts would at least be done carefully and thoughtfully if she were in charge. One can have no such confidence about Chuck Hagel. Indeed, can anyone even imagine Chuck Hagel having the wit or knowledge to write an op-ed such as Flournoy's? After his performance before the Senate Armed Services Committee, would it be even credible to have Chuck Hagel sign such a piece once someone else had written it? 

It's worth repeating this obvious point: If a few Senate Democrats desert Chuck Hagel and he's forced to withdraw as the nominee, we don't (alas!) get a neoconservative defense secretary. We could, though, get a far more impressive Obama supporter, a competent Democrat.

Will no Senate Democrat have the courage to step forward to produce this result, a superior one for both the Obama administration and, more importantly, the country?   I thank you FirozaliA.Mulla DBA

famulla5
famulla5

Some how we never solve the Middle when it is very important as we need this and West and east The European Central Bank is unlikely to contemplate an interest rate cut at Thursday's policy meeting despite the euro's sharp rise, but its chief almost certainly faces a grilling afterwards over an Italian banking scandal. The euro's strength will need to show significant harm to the economy before the Governing Council reverses course, and there is next-to-no chance of that happening at its monthly meeting. Far more likely is that the appreciation will delay discussion of an exit from the ECB's crisis policy. And a given is that President Mario Draghi will face questioning from reporters over the scandal at Monte dei Paschi (BMPS.MI). At Thursday's news conference Draghi can expect to be asked how much he knew about the derivatives scandal at Monte Paschi, and what he did about it when he headed Italy's central bank from 2006 to 2011. ING economist Carsten Brzeski expected Draghi to remain tight-lipped. However, he said the scandal would shine a light on the difficulties the ECB faces in building up aeuro zone-wide banking supervisory body that is credible but separate from its main business of setting interest rates. "It only stresses that the supervisory role is a hell of a job," said Brzeski.Italy's third largest bank has been at the centre of a financial and political storm since it revealed it faced losses of about 720 million euros ($986 million) from a series of derivatives and structured financetrades. Draghi should have an easier ride on monetary policy, None of the 75 economists surveyed in a Reuters poll last week forecast a cut in rates from their record low of 0.75 percent on Thursday. The poll suggested the ECB would not change its rates until at least July 2014 Deutsche Bank economist Gilles Moec, who has just completed a report on the foreign exchange 'pain threshold' for euro zone economies, found thatFranceand Italy are already suffering from the euro's appreciation but that Germany is comfortable. The currency has risen about 3 percent against the dollar since the ECB's last monetary policy meeting on January 10, when Draghi unwound expectations the ECB would cut rates soon. "In terms of the pain threshold for the euro zone as a whole, we're right on it," Moec said. "So at the euro zone aggregate level, there is no massive pressure that would force the ECB into paying immediate attention to this." "You would have to see a clear impact on some data" from the euro's rise before changing course on rates, said Moec, pointing to export orders and purchasing managers' indices. "You need a smoking gun, and the smoking gun is not there." I thank you Firozali A.Mulla DBA  

famulla5
famulla5

Financial aid caught in congressional crossfire Awards up in the air for coming academic year Many financial-aid packages that begin going out this month for college students may as well come with a disclaimer: “awards depend on how the fiscal showdown plays out in Washington.” The automatic spending cuts that had been scheduled to kick in on Jan. 1 included a reduction of 8.2% in federal financial aid, amounting to about $350 million. The fiscal-cliff compromise reached by Congress postponed those cuts until March 1. With many schools sending out award letters in coming weeks, experts say that will leave many parents and college-bound students uncertain about the size of their financial-aid packages—and whether the promised aid will materialize in the fall. Financial advisers have traditionally recommended that parents compare packages from different schools to determine which one had the lowest out-of-pocket costs. But experts say that makes little sense in this environment, since some colleges are assuming the spending cuts will happen, while others aren’t. If cuts are implemented, some students may find their aid is scaled back after they’ve picked a school. Experts say colleges with larger endowments or bigger tuition revenues are more likely to use those funds to make up for federal cuts. But most colleges and universities depend on the federal government for financial aid. “If Congress doesn’t come through, students and parents are going to be left in the lurch,” says Justin Draeger, president of the National Association of Student Financial Aid Administrators. Several colleges have already calculated that cuts, if implemented, would cost some students. Pennsylvania State University, for example, says roughly 375 of its students will completely lose work study—mostly on-campus paid positions largely funded by the government—or the need-based Federal Supplemental Educational Opportunity Grant. Ohio State University says federal aid cuts could reduce funding for those two programs for 500 of its students, though the school says it is looking at ways to fill the gap. The University of Texas at Austin says its students could lose roughly 65 work-study positions. Six-figure salary, no Bachelor's required Quentin Fottrell joins Lunch Break to look at the top five best-paid jobs, no bachelor's required. Congress may also make cuts in the Pell grant, the most popular federal college grant, says Mark Kantrowitz, publisher of FinAid.org, which tracks financial aid and student-loan debt. The Pell grant reached about nine million students in 2011-12, according to FinAid.org. For now, parents should review financial-aid letters and look for contingency statements or discrepancies in awards (for example, if one school claims the student will receive a federal grant but another school doesn’t). If discrepancies appear, parents should contact the financial-aid offices to find out what assumptions they are making about aid, and what to expect if those assumptions don’t pan out.I thank you Firozali A.Mulla DBA 

famulla5
famulla5

The US budget deficit will drop below $1 trillion for the first time in President Barack Obama's tenure in office, a new report said on Tuesday. The Congressional Budget Office analysis said the government will run a $845 billion deficit this year, a modest improvement compared to last year's $1.1 trillion shortfall but still enough red ink to require the government to borrow 24 cents of every dollar it spends. The agency projected that the economy will grow just 1.4 percent this year if $85 billion in across-the-board spending cuts take effect as scheduled March 1.Unemployment would average 8 percent. Obama wants to ease the cuts by replacing them with new tax revenue and alternative cuts, but a clash is looming with Republicans who insist that last month's tax increase on wealthier earners will be the last tax hike they permit. The report predicted the deficit would dip to $430 billion by 2015, the lowest since the government posted a $459 billion deficit is former President George W. Bush's last year in office. That would be a relatively low 2.4 percent when measured against the size of the economy. But deficits would move higher after that and again reach near $1 trillion in the latter portion of the 10-year window, despite the recently enacted tax increase on family income exceeding $450,000 and automatic spending cuts of about $100 billion a year. The package of spending cuts and tax increases are punishment for Washington's failure to strike a long-term budget pact. I thank you Firozali A.Mulla DBA 

GoogleFeed.com
GoogleFeed.com

Yesterday a Massive sell off and now rallying in Pre-market. Neither a solid reason for yesterday sell off nor for today's rally in Markets.  But

Every time I notice that people change their sentiments very Quickly, yesterday people were saying that US , UK massive sell off is due to Political instability in Europe , I want to ask them Did they solve their Political problems today? Answer is no matter what happen ,things change in markets when Investor's want to take profits . Yesterday was a day of profit taking and People who want to invest in Markets need to be ready for these sort of Activities.

http://wallstnews.blogspot.com/

famulla5
famulla5

Citigroup Inc (C.N) has appointed veteran dealmaker Luigi de Vecchi as chairman for corporate and investment banking in continental Europe, it said in an emailed statement on Monday.


De Vecchi, who was previously global co-head of investment banking at Credit Suisse (CSGN.VX) and has also worked at Goldman Sachs (GS.N), will be based in Italy and is part of the U.S. bank's plan to beef up its investment banking franchise in the region.


"Continental Europe remains one of our largest growth opportunities and we look forward to leveraging Luigi's deal experience and relationships across the region," Raymond J. McGuire, global head of corporate and investment banking at Citi said in the statement.


The senior hire follows the U.S. bank's latest restructuring plan announced under new chief executive Mike Corbat who took over in October.


He unveiled a $1.1 billion expense reduction plan in Dec including the elimination of 11,000 jobs or 4 percent of the workforce in a bid to deliver more value to shareholders.


Corbat said Citi's various businesses were combating competitive and regulatory problems, as well as issues dating to the financial crisis that continue to plague the bank. I thank you FirozaliA.Mulla DBA

famulla5
famulla5

I really hope this farce can end as soon as possible. As we all known, countries only existed benefit not real friendship.However,under this condition,if each country just considered their own interests, cooperation relationship must be broken up. it is really funny that people can share sorrow not happiness while countries can share good situation not difficulty.Euro zone crisis is not only a threat to Europe but also form a bad impact on other regions, especially the export-oriented country like China.The debt crisis which caused by the sovereign debt crisis spread to Portugal, Italy and other countries and even the entire European Union interior. Now it influenced the world economy constantly. Europe economy directly affected China's export. Because China is still mainly export-oriented economy, and exports amount to high portions in the economy. Although China did not export much to Greece and Spain, as a result of the upvaluation of the RMB to a larger extent, the competitiveness of the price of the product China export to European will decline. If the export enterprises use the euro and the pound, it is confronted with exchange rate risk. In addition, due to the devaluation of Europe currency, The export that European Union to China will increase, So China's poor surplus is likely to bring down.The decrease in export is bound to produce a profound impact on China's economy. Securities industry can not escape from it. I thank you Firozali A.Mulla DBA

famulla5
famulla5

Mario Draghiwas informed of doubts raised byBank of Italyinspectors aboutthe Montedei Paschi bank but had little control over what has been widely criticised as ineffective oversight of the scandal-hit lender. The rootsof the corruption and derivativesscandalat Monte dei Paschi all stem back to when Draghi, now president of theEuropean Central Bank, was chief of Italy's central bank from 2006 to 2011. The Bank of Italy (BoI) says it did everything in its powers to overseeMonte Paschi, including forcing it to raise new capital and applying behind the scenes pressure to force out its executives, who left last year. Last month, the BoI approved 3.9 billion euros ($5.3 billion) of state loans needed by the ailingSiena bankto shore up its capital. But the BoI, under Draghi's leadership, is under fire for not acting faster to sanction those managers and centre of the scandal back in mid-2010. The criticism has come fromMonte Paschishareholders, savers and politicians fired up by the campaign for a national election this month, but also from some banking and regulation experts. However, the senior BoI source stressed that the decision on launching a sanctions procedure, involving publicly blaming and fining bank officials, does not depend on the BoI governor and its five member executive board, but on the bank's inspectors and then a series of lower committees. "The inspectors are the only people responsible for initiating a sanctions procedure so if they don't find anything in the course of their inspection then it's not possible for the top management to start the process," said the source, who asked not to be named. "We instruct the staff to be absolutely free from any influence from us, to present exactly the case, so if a sanction is decided then they present a proposal to the board and the board decides on the actual implementation of the sanctions." In the summer of 2010BoI inspectorsuncovered two opaque derivatives contracts that could cost Monte Paschi 720 million euros and are now at the centre offraud investigations, yet did not propose that sanctions be launched. That decision "had nothing to do with the board," the official said, though he added thatDraghiwas shown the inspectors report. He declined to say whether he thought it was a good decision not to propose sanctions at that time. SLOW BUT DELIBERATE That 2010 inspectors' report was leaked to the press and sparked much of the current criticism of the BoI because the sharp criticisms of Monte Paschi's accounts and operations made by the inspectors were not followed by pressing action. The BoI did not summon Monte Paschi's executives, now under make its doubts public even though its inspectors had spotted the derivatives contracts at the criminal investigation, until November 2011, after Draghi had left to head the ECB. It did not launch a sanctions procedure - which is still not completed - until the following year, after the officials had left the bank. Monte Paschi's shareholders did not find out about the irregularities until last month. The Bank of Italy said it informed Siena prosecutors about their concerns over the derivatives contracts some time in 2012, but the prosecutors had already been investigating Monte Paschi since November of the previous year, and possibly earlier"We may perhaps appear to be slow, but I think we are deliberate," the official said. He also stressed that although Monte Paschi failed to comply with the BoI's requests, the wrongdoing was already done at the time of the 2010 inspection. I thank you Firozali A.Mulla DBA

famulla5
famulla5

USA >>Two pension funds filed a lawsuit against Blackrock, alleging that the world's biggest asset manager had "looted" securities-lending revenues from iShares exchange-traded funds investors, and breached its fiduciary duties. In the suit, the Laborers' Local 265 Pension Fund of Cincinnati and the Plumbers and Pipefitters Local No. 572 Pension Fund of Nashville allege that several iShares ETFs spent funds on "grossly excessive compensation" to agents affiliated with the ETFs, as well as on other agents, and they want to recover the funds for investors. Blackrock's iShares ETFs have "systematically violated their fiduciary duties, setting up an excessive fee structure designed to loot securities lending returns properly due to iShares investors," they say in the suit, filed on January 18 in the Middle District Court of Tennessee. The two pension funds allege that Blackrock officials and the iShares ETFs ran a scheme to take at least 40 percent of securities lending revenues - which they called "entirely disproportionate" - for themselves at the expense of investors. Blackrock President Robert Kapito and iShares Chairman Michael Latham are named as defendants in the suit. Blackrock, the largest manager of ETFs, said on Sunday the complaint was without merit, adding it will "contest it vigorously." The company's securities-lending program has delivered above-average returns to its ETF shareholders over time, Blackrock spokeswoman Caroline Hancock said in an email. "To achieve this, we run the program ourselves while bearing all the costs, rather than outsourcing to third parties as others do," she added. The recently acquired iShares unit has been a stellar performer for the New York-based asset manager, bringing in $36 billion of new business for Blackrock in the fourth quarter. I thank you Firozali A.Mulla DBA

famulla5
famulla5

U.S. and States Prepare to Sue S.&P. Over Mortgage Ratings The Justice Department, along with state prosecutors, plans to file civil charges againstStandard & Poor'sRatings Service, accusing the firm of fraudulently rating mortgage bonds that led to the financial crisis, people briefed on the plan said Monday. Up until last week, the Justice Department had been in settlement talks with S.&P., these people said. But the negotiations broke down after the Justice Department said it would seek a settlement in excess of "10 figures," or at least $1 billion, these people said, which would wipe out the profits of S.&P.'s parent,the McGraw-HillCompany, for an entire year. McGraw-Hill earned $911 million last year. A suit against S.&P. would be the first the government has brought against the credit ratings agencies related to the financial crisis, despite continued questions about the agencies' conflicts of interest and role in creating a housing bubble. During settlement negotiations, the Justice Department held out the threat of a criminal case against S.&P., the people said. Ultimately, the government plans to bring a civil suit, which has a lower burden of proof than a criminal case. the mortgage securities were created in 2007 at the height of the housing boom. Prosecutors, according to the people, have uncovered troves emails by S&P, employees, which the government considers damaging. Portions of those emails are likely to be disclosed in the government's complaint against S&P, these people said. In a statement on Monday, S.&P. said it had received notice from the Justice Department over a pending lawsuit. The ratings agency argued any such legal action would be baseless, since it downgraded plenty of mortgage-backed investments, including in the two years leading up to the financial crisis. It also contended that other observers of the debt markets, including government officials, believed at the time that any problems within the housing sector could be contained. "A D.O.J. lawsuit would be entirely without factual or legal merit," the agency said in its statement. "With 20/20 hindsight, these strong actions proved insufficient - but they demonstrate that the D.O.J. would be wrong in contending that S.&P. ratings were motivated by commercial considerations and not issued in good faith." . I thank you Firozali A.Mulla DBA

GeorgeOrwell
GeorgeOrwell

Oh and that excludes Google.  Google has the one truly necessary commodity: search. That is what we all cannot do without. 

GeorgeOrwell
GeorgeOrwell

The big issue about social media tech stocks, is that they depend upon the completely unrealistic assumption that people will continue in large numbers to think its worth giving up their privacy and personal data in exchange for very simple photosharing.  Slowly people are getting burned. Snooped on by prospective employees, wanting go be different things to different people, at risk for political opinions to be made public to all governments or "friends"  all in exchange for a short term thrill of imagining that every one cares to  know about you, when the fact is that only your 7 real friends are remotely interested. 


So my prediction is that people will slowly STOP giving up their private data. The new hip will be privacy.  And then this whole boom of everything social,  will slowly unwind. 

And in the smart phone space. More and more competition will erode super profits, either to zero forcing some to go bust or to a low steady state of high competition. 

So all in all the hugely profitable world of tech stocks will erode - unless there is a significant knew innovation to garner super profits for a year or two max.