Mississippi River Could Close to Barge Traffic Within Days

Traffic on the Mississippi River – which transports everything from grain to petroleum to coal – could come to a halt as soon as this weekend.

  • Share
  • Read Later
United States Coast Guard / Colby Buchanan

A line of towboats with fully loaded barges moves through the Chain of Rocks Canal near St. Louis, which allows operators to circumvent an impassable section of the Mississippi River on Dec. 12.

Drought may cause traffic on the Mississippi River – which is used to transport everything from grain to petroleum to coal – to a halt as soon as this weekend. And the stoppage could last for months.

The lack of precipitation throughout much of the country has brought about drought conditions that the National Climatic Data Center has called the worst since the 1950s. Water levels on the river are lowest in a 180-mile stretch between St. Louis and Cairo, Ill., sometimes referred to as the Middle Mississippi. That’s where the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers has been dredging to maintain a 9-foot channel to allow barges and boats to pass. Most vessels can’t travel in waters any shallower.

(MORE: Why 2013 Will Be Another Huge Year for Car Sales)

According to the American Waterways Operators (a trade group representing the tugboat, towboat, and barge industry) and Waterways Council (a national public policy organization), a traffic stoppage could occur as soon as this weekend, halting a $180 billion transportation industry. The groups estimate that a disruption in the Mississippi River’s supply chain could affect more than 8,000 jobs, $54 million in wages and benefits, and 7.2 million tons of commodities worth $2.8 billion.

Jerry Fruin, an applied economics professor at the University of Iowa, says that the two groups’ estimates on the value and quantity of commodities along the Mississippi are on target, but adds the economic ramifications may be overstated because other transportation sectors like rail or trucking would likely get a boost from accommodating some of the cargo that can’t travel down the river by boat.

While the river appears to be shrinking faster than some expected, some short-term rain is in the forecast – which could delay a potential shutdown. But many are expecting an eventual halt to shipping soon. “There’s a very real risk of a shutdown for six to eight weeks,” Fruin says.

(MORE: What Choice? How Abortion-Rights Are Losing)

The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, however, remains hopeful that a traffic stoppage can be averted. Bob Anderson, an Army Corps spokesperson, says he is “cautiously optimistic” the river will remain open. The latest forecasts call for above-average precipitation and temperatures, which melt snowfall in the upper Mississippi. “But with absolutely no rain, you could see historic lows outside of St. Louis around the 15th or 16th of January,” he says.

Much of the corn, soybeans, and grain traveling along the river are exports and head toward New Orleans and the Gulf of Mexico en route to other countries. Some of those goods, along with commodities like petroleum, fertilizer, and steel, may end up being transported by rail or truck at a higher cost, says C. Phillip Baumel, a professor of agriculture at Iowa State University. But any costs passed onto consumers are likely to be minimal. The primary impact from a Mississippi shutdown would be on farmers who will have trouble exporting their crops, and barge, towboat, and tugboat operators who are contracted with farmers and stuck on the river.

The one bright spot for the struggling Mississippi is timing. January is typically the slowest time of the year for traffic along the country’s most important waterway. Upper portions of the Mississippi River in Minnesota, Iowa, and parts of western Illinois are frozen. Shipping along the rivers that feed into the Mississippi, like the Illinois, are also historically slow in colder months. Of an estimated $180 billion of goods that travels along the river each year, only about $7 billion is transported in December and January, according to Bloomberg News.

“If you’re going to pick a month to have a problem, January would be the least economically significant,” says Fruin. “It’s not an economic disaster if it’s short-lived, but it’s going to be very disruptive.”

MORE: The Not-So-Mighty Mississippi: How the River’s Low Water Levels Are Impacting the Economy

1 comments
DBritt
DBritt

By now articles of this nature should have some climate context.  The reference to drought in the 50s doesn't paint a good enough picture.  How about this:

"The area of the contiguous U.S. in moderate or greater drought peaked
at 61.8% in July–the largest such area since the Dust Bowl drought of
December 1939. The heat and dryness resulted in record or near-record
evaporation rates, causing major impact on corn, soybean and wheat belts
in addition to livestock production. Drought upstream of the Lower
Mississippi River caused record and near-record low stream flows along
the river in Mississippi and Louisiana, resulting in limited river
transportation and commerce. Crop damages alone from the great drought
are estimated at $35 billion. As the total scope of losses is realized
across all lines of business in coming months, this number will climb
significantly." (
http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2012/12/26/1375081/top-ten-us-weather-events-of-2012/)

That is a much clearer picture of the context in which this drought is occurring.  From the Time article you'd think shipping was its only impact.