Whoever He Is, the President Elect Will Quickly Face an Economic Crisis

The U.S. is confronting a dizzying array of financial issues that will have to be dealt with early next year.

  • Share
  • Read Later
Getty Images

This election cycle has been so contentious, divisive, and relentless that most Americans will breathe a sigh of relief once it’s over. Vice President Joe Biden has said he plans to take a vacation three days after the election, but the President Elect will have no such chance to kick back. In fact, he will scarcely have time to catch his breath once the ballot counting is completed. For while the drama of this election has monopolized much of the media coverage in recent weeks, the U.S. is confronting a host of terribly difficult economic issues that will have to be dealt with early next year.

Fortunately, the most daunting challenges facing the nation offer some breathing room. The current recovery has been the weakest since World War II, and the current unemployment rate is higher than it was the day that President Obama was sworn into office. Some experts say this is because the recession hit the financial and housing sectors unusually hard, doing structural damage that held back the rebound. Others argue that it is the result of a badly targeted stimulus program and misguided tax and regulatory policies. Either way, something will need to be done to accelerate the speed of the recovery.

(PHOTOSThe Recession in Pictures: America Copes with a Stagnant Economy)

Over the longer term, the U.S. also faces a debt crisis. Borrowing more than a trillion dollars a year is swelling the debt faster than the economy can grow. That means debt will continue to rise relative to GDP, putting the U.S. on track to economic instability. It will be some years, however, until the country reaches an acute crisis. At present, the ballooning debt – and the Federal Reserve’s easy-money policies that finance it – have not significantly pushed up either interest rates or inflation. The key to any permanent deficit solution will be reform of the major entitlements, including Social Security and health care. And that will require extraordinarily difficult compromises.

(MORE: The Art of Badmouthing Good Jobs News)

Those compromises are unlikely to be reached in the brief lame-duck session of Congress. Substantive progress will most likely be delayed until the new session of Congress begins in early January. And if Mitt Romney wins the election, formal negotiations will have to wait until he is sworn in later in the month. Although it will probably be possible to reach agreement on short-term extensions if circumstances require, a number of economic issues can’t be postponed for very long. By early next year, the President will have a dizzying array of problems on his desk, all marked urgent. Here’s a closer look at what the country faces over the next few months:

The sequester. In the absence of a more comprehensive agreement to reduce the deficit, last year’s deal to raise the debt ceiling required automatic spending cuts – almost $55 billion in defense cuts that would take effect in 2013, as well as $38 billion in non-defense cuts. This so-called fiscal cliff, which is already having a depressive effect on the economy, includes spending reductions of at least 7% for a wide range of Federal activities, from health and education to the immigration service and the court system. No one really wants this to happen, but preventing it will require a compromise on deficit reduction that hasn’t been reached after more than a year.

Expiration of the Bush tax cuts. The 2010 extension of the Bush tax cuts is scheduled to expire, which would raise Federal revenue by more than $250 billion a year. If that happens, income tax rates for most Americans would rise by two-to-four percentage points, costing the typical family more than $1,200 in 2013, according to calculations by the Tax Policy Center. Other tax increases would bring the total cost to more than $2,000 a year for the typical family and more than $3,500 for the affluent. The question of who should pay how much more continues to be a stumbling block.

(MORE: The Recession in Pictures: America Copes with a Stagnant Economy)

Expiration of the payroll tax cut. Among the other tax increases that could expire in 2013 are several that were part of President Obama’s stimulus package. The most important is a temporary two-percentage-point reduction in the payroll tax for Social Security (worth $670 for the typical family and more than $1,200 for the affluent). Miscellaneous stimulus benefits vary from household to household, but add another hundred bucks, on average.

Expiration of unemployment insurance. In February, the Federal government offered additional unemployment benefits – typically 14 to 20 weeks – beyond the 26 weeks of jobless benefits that states normally provide. Under current law, however, no payments can be made after the week ending on Dec. 29, which would save the Federal government an estimated $26 billion in 2013.

Health-care cuts. Obamacare’s reductions in Medicare payments will begin, saving $11 billion in 2013, with hospitals taking the biggest hit. In addition, to help fund Obamacare, wealthy households will pay an additional 0.9% tax on income above $250,000 ($200,000 for singles), as well as additional taxes on capital gains, dividends, and interest of up to 3.8%.

Hitting the debt ceiling. The U.S. has been borrowing money so fast that it is likely to hit the debt ceiling again before the end of the year. The Treasury estimates that it could extend the deadline to mid-February through various technical measures. Any delay, however, could be damaging to the government’s credit rating.

As if domestic problems weren’t enough, financial turmoil in Europe continues to worsen. Five of the 17 countries that make up the euro zone are already in recession, and unemployment has risen to a record high of 11.6%. Neither the President nor Congress can affect the timing of troubles overseas, of course, and the odds will only increase over the coming months that a financial crisis in the euro zone will send a major shock throughout the global banking system.

(MORE: Playing for Keeps)

No one expects that all the scheduled spending cuts and tax increases will take place – if they did, it would probably throw the U.S. back into a serious recession. However, the atmosphere in Washington remains confrontational, and addressing each of the potential economic stumbling blocks will require time and delicate negotiations. Even without political gridlock, the list of issues would be difficult to get through in less than three months. So the next President will finish one campaign only to have to begin another.

6 comments
MaryIngram
MaryIngram

Any Problems With Voting Call 1800-myvote1

rjsigmund
rjsigmund

"U.S. also faces a debt crisis"...nonsense; thats been manufactured as an excuse to push the middle class down...

The US Government can’t involuntarily run out of fiat money because it has theconstitutional authority to create it without limit. Congress constrains andregulates this ability; but its existence is still a stubborn fact!

– The Federal Government is not like a household! Households can’t make their own currency and require that people use that currency to pay taxes! So, their supply of dollars is always limited; while the Government’s supply is a matter of its decisions alone.

gwwmovie
gwwmovie

@rjsigmund 

@rjsigmundThe incredible illogic of your premise is best understood by taking it to its logical conclusion:

If "the US Government can’t involuntarily run out of fiat money because it has theconstitutional authority to create it without limit", then why not simply position a fleet of helicopters over every major US city and rain down hundred dollar bills?

That would seem to be a sure-fire solution to economic decline.....

The ability to print unlimited amounts of green paper with pictures of dead Presidents on it, does not mean that the pieces of paper have any actual value whatsoever.

They have value to precisely the extent that they represent a claim on actual production of actual physical wealth.

This is something the victims of a modern college education have a great deal of difficulty grasping, and so the lesson will have to be re-taught.

The historical record is very clear.

Every fiat currency ever implemented throughout history has ended up at its natural equilibrium value, which is zero.

distantsmoke
distantsmoke

I know one thing for sure:

If Obama is re-elected, the economy will still be Bush's fault.

If Romney is elected, the economy will be Romney's fault 20 seconds after he is declared the winner.

Either way it will never be Obama's fault.  

The media tells me this, so I know it's true.

(sarcasm for those unable to recognize it)