How Chinese Energy Politics Will Reshape the Middle East

China’s going to import a lot more oil from Iran and the Arab world over the next two decades. America will import far less. Those two facts will profoundly change the geopolitics of the Middle East.

By Rana Foroohar | February 17, 2012 | +

Illustration by Alexander Ho for TIME

Two of the biggest news stories of the week have been growing tensions between Iran and Israel, and Chinese Vice President Xi Jinping’s five-day tour of the U.S. to bolster relationships between the two nations, which have taken a hit in recent months due to trade and currency posturing. While there’s been plenty of commentary on both issues, these two stories are crucially related in a way that most of the press hasn’t explored.

U.S.-China relations are tense because Americans are worried that China is eating their economic lunch – in a 2011 Gallup poll that asked Americans to identify the world’s leading economy, 52% said China and only 32% cited the U.S. China’s economy is still only a third the size of the U.S economy, and its average income is only a tenth that of America’s, which is a measure of the paranoia about the rise of the Middle Kingdom.

China is rising fast, of course – huge growth in the Middle Kingdom is one reason that oil prices have been so high over the last several years. It’s no accident that China, along with petro-power Russia, has made it difficult to impose sanctions against Iran, which continues to pursue a nuclear program, creating a tense standoff with Israel. Just yesterday, Dow Jones reported that China’s big state oil company, Unipec, signed a deal to buy crude from the National Iranian Oil Company for the remainder of this year. Don’t think for a minute that China is going to let U.S. sanctions keep them from meeting their energy needs.

(MORE: Special Delivery: Makeup-of-the-Month Clubs Are Wooing Cosmetics Lovers with Affordable Samples)

And those needs are growing. The recently released Energy Outlook report from BP predicted that by 2030, China would very likely become increasingly reliant on foreign oil, importing up to 80% of its needs, much of it from the Middle East (ditto India, which will import over 90%). Meanwhile, the U.S. could become almost entirely energy independent during the same time period, as the country expands its own domestic natural gas production (via fracking, which many experts believe will become environmentally acceptable as technology improves) and the importing of more oil and gas from Canada. It’s a trend line that will continue with or without the Keystone Pipeline. “You’ve got a Western Hemisphere that by 2030 may not be importing any oil from the Eastern Hemisphere,” says Daniel Yergin, the Pulitzer Prize-winning oil expert whose new book, “The Quest” explores energy security.

All this has profound implications for the geopolitics of the Middle East. China isn’t interested in Israel the way that America has traditionally been – they are interested in as much cheap oil as they can acquire in the region. China also has a tendency of not caring much what kind of regime it works with – as long as it can use them to meet its energy needs. Witness the continual deal cutting with Iran and how it will insert itself into the sectarian politics of the region. And any new regime in Syria (especially one that is less friendly with Iran) is up for grabs. The bottom line is that China’s economic growth isn’t just a challenge for the U.S. – it’s a total game-changer for Middle Eastern geopolitics.

MORE: The U.S. and China Are Still Wary After All These Years

Book Review: What America’s Banana King Teaches Us About Capitalism

Americans puzzling over the role of today’s powerful corporations — Bain Capital, Goldman Sachs, Google — may profit from considering the example of the United Fruit Company.

It seems almost quaint to think that a company specializing in bananas might have once been considered a capitalist giant on the level of today’s firms, but so it was — at its height in the first half of the last century, United Fruit owned one of the largest private navies in the world. It owned 50 percent of the private land in Honduras and 70 percent of all private land and every mile of railroad in Guatemala.

Why Companies Can No Longer Afford to Ignore Their Social Responsibilities

In 1970, the economist and Nobel laureate Milton Friedman published an article in The New York Times Magazine titled, “The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits.” In the article, he referred to corporate social responsibility (CSR) programs as “hypocritical window-dressing,” and said that businesspeople inclined toward such programs “reveal a suicidal impulse.” Even four decades ago, at a time of growing public concern for the environment, his views represented the general skepticism and contempt with which many in Corporate America viewed CSR.

http://emilylewis100.wordpress.com Emily Lewis

Reblogged this on Emily Lewis and commented:
Energy shifts, geo-economic shifts, and the world will shift. Its hard to determine what will happen politically to the global politics in the East, “China also has a tendency of not caring much what kind of regime it works with – as long as it can use them to meet its energy needs.”