Apple Stock Hits $500 as China ‘iPad’ Trademark Case Escalates

ChinaFotoPress via Getty Images
ChinaFotoPress via Getty Images
Outside an Apple store in Shanghai, China.

First, the good news: Apple shares briefly hit $500 Monday morning for the first time in its history — an impressive milestone and psychological threshold that underscores the incredible success of America’s largest technology company. Now, the bad news: Apple’s headaches in China continue, as authorities in the northern city of Shijiazhuang have reportedly confiscated dozens of iPads due to an escalating copyright dispute.

Apple is now indisputably America’s most valuable company, with a market capitalization of $466 billion. Exxon Mobil, by contrast, is valued at $398 billion. Apple soaring stock price, which has made the company worth more than Microsoft and Google combined, is being fueled by its stunning financial results: Last quarter the company reported a profit of $13.1 billion on sales of $46.3 billion. And rumors that a new version of the iPad will appear next month are driving the company’s share price higher still.

(More: Apple Faces $1.6 Billion Legal Challenge Over iPad Name in China)

But even as Apple has risen to new heights in the U.S., the company faces continued headaches in China. Specifically, Apple is embroiled in an escalating copyright dispute over the term “iPad,” in which a Chinese company has asked for a court order barring the company from the selling the device in China. On Monday, news emerged that the case has taken an ominous turn for Apple. Officials with the Xinhua District Administration of Industry and Commerce have confiscated dozens of iPads from retailers in the city of Shijiazhuang, according to The Wall Street Journal‘s China Realtime Report. The seizure occurred following a complaint by Proview Technology, which claims to own the iPad trademark in China.

(More: Apple Now Worth More Than Microsoft, Google Combined)

The Journal cited the blog of Beijing-based intellectual property lawyer Stan Abrams, who wrote that the copyright dispute seems to be taking a negative turn for Apple. “This is starting to look very ugly for Apple, and every day this goes on, the price for that trademark is probably going up,” Abrams wrote. “Perhaps Apple’s legal team knows something that we don’t, but even if they think they can win these legal challenges, the commercial disruptions in the meantime are going to be significant.”

“It’s going to be a very rough year for the iPad in China unless this whole thing is wrapped up immediately via a settlement,” Abrams added.

(More: Should Americans Care About Apple’s iPhone-Factory Conditions?)

Meanwhile, Apple said Monday that it has asked the Fair Labor Association to conduct “special voluntary audits” of the company’s supplier factories in China. The move comes weeks after reports in The New York Times focused attention on working conditions at Apple contractors, particularly Foxconn, the massive factory complex which produces iPhone and iPads, as well as devices for most of the world’s top high-tech companies. The FLA will report its findings in March, which means that the controversy over Apple’s supplier working conditions will continue into next month.

Related Topics: Apple, Exxon Mobil, Foxconn, Google, iPad, Microsoft, Proview, Apple, Technology & Media
  • Latest on Business

    Book Review: What America's Banana King Teaches Us About Capitalism

    Book Review: What America’s Banana King Teaches Us About Capitalism

    Americans puzzling over the role of today’s powerful corporations — Bain Capital, Goldman Sachs, Google — may profit from considering the example of the United Fruit Company.

    It seems almost quaint to think that a company specializing in bananas might have once been considered a capitalist giant on the level of today’s firms, but so it was — at its height in the first half of the last century, United Fruit owned one of the largest private navies in the world. It owned 50 percent of the private land in Honduras and 70 percent of all private land and every mile of railroad in Guatemala.

    The Bomb Hidden in Mitt Romney's Education PlanSlate

    Ed Freeman / Getty Images

    Why Companies Can No Longer Afford to Ignore Their Social Responsibilities

    In 1970, the economist and Nobel laureate Milton Friedman published an article in The New York Times Magazine titled, “The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits.” In the article, he referred to corporate social responsibility (CSR) programs as “hypocritical window-dressing,” and said that businesspeople inclined toward such programs “reveal a suicidal impulse.” Even four decades ago, at a time of growing public concern for the environment, his views represented the general skepticism and contempt with which many in Corporate America viewed CSR.

  • http://latestnewsindia.org/2012/02/apples-ipad-outselling-samsungs-own-tablets-in-korea-cnet/ Apple’s iPad outselling Samsung’s own tablets in Korea – CNET | Latest News

    [...] city seizes Apple iPads in dispute with domestic company …Washington PostMarketWatch -TIME -Los Angeles Timesall 290 news [...]

  • http://www.nature-help.com/news/chinese-city-halts-ipad-sales-in-trademark-row-financial-times/ Chinese city halts iPad sales in trademark row – Financial Times | Amazing News

    [...] domestic company …Washington PostApple: Share Soars, Audit Launched, iPads TakenMarketWatchTIME -Los Angeles Times -PC Magazineall 265 news articles » This entry was [...]

  • http://techland.time.com/2012/02/14/chinese-company-to-seek-ban-on-ipad-import-export/ Chinese Company to Seek Ban on iPad Import, Export | Techland | TIME.com

    [...] (MORE: Apple Stock Hits $500 as China ‘iPad’ Trademark Case Escalates) [...]

  • http://business.time.com/2012/02/14/apple-threatened-with-ipad-shipment-ban-in-china-trademark-fight/ Apple Threatened with iPad Shipment Ban in China Trademark Fight | Business | TIME.com

    [...] property dispute comes one day after reports emerged that Chinese authorities had begun seizing iPads off the shelves of retailers in at least one Chinese city. Proview has asked for iPads to removed in 30 other [...]

  • http://dailylounge.com/?p=6190 Daily Lounge » Blog Archive » Why Did Officials in a City in China Essentially Ban the iPad?

    [...] “This is starting to look very ugly for Apple,” warned Stan Abrams, an intellectual property lawyer from Beijing. “And every day this goes on, the price for that trademark is probably going up. Perhaps Apple’s legal team knows something that we don’t, but even if they think they can win these legal challenges, the commercial disruptions in the meantime are going to be significant.” [...]

  • http://www.lawyers-in.com/copyright-lawyer-688/ Copyright Lawyer

    [...] Apple Stock Hits $500 As China ‘iPad’ Trademark Case EscalatesFirst, the good news: Apple shares briefly hit $500 Monday for the first time in its history. The bad news? Apple’s headaches in China continue, as authorities in the northern city of Shijiazhuang have reportedly confiscated dozens of iPads due to an escalating copyright dispute. … Read News [...]

blog comments powered by Disqus