How to Save Capitalism

  • Share
  • Read Later
Fabrice Coffrini / AFP / Getty Images

As the global economic crisis enters its fourth excruciating year, just about everybody who can be blamed for the downturn has been blamed. Irresponsible bankers. Greedy corporate executives. Incompetent regulators. Bickering politicians. Underpaid Chinese workers. Overpaid Greek workers. George W. Bush. Ben Bernanke. Angela Merkel. Credit-rating agencies. The euro. Spendthrift American consumers. After the worst financial disaster since the Great Depression of the 1930s, there has been no shortage of vilification to go around. With another grim year likely ahead and no ready solutions in sight, a new target has arisen in the public’s crosshairs: capitalism itself.

It’s easy to see why. As jobs remain scarce and the welfare of middle-class American and European families has come under strain, capitalism, as it functions today, seems to have failed to do what it is supposed to do: provide economic opportunity and a better future for all. We’re taught in school that capitalism is a meritocracy that rewards the hardworking and talented. In the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, however, capitalism often appears to benefit only the connected and privileged. To many, Wall Street financiers remain unreformed and unrepentant; they’re still getting rich off the same sort of risky shenanigans that caused the U.S. economy to tank in the first place. Bankers evict families from their homes only to tear those homes down. Greek, Spanish and Portuguese citizens suffer through budget cuts and tax hikes to appease impatient bondholders and bankers. CEOs pocket multimillion-dollar bonuses while laying off thousands.

(MORE: The Challenge at Davos, a Crisis of Global Politics, Not Just the Economy)

The roots of discontent with capitalism run much deeper than the current slump. Over the past three decades, as capitalism has become freer and more globalized, the rich have benefited enormously while the many have often been left with the crumbs. The gap between rich and poor has been widening just about everywhere. In a 2011 report, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development figured that the level of income inequality in the 22 member nations it studied increased by 10% since the mid-1980s, with conditions deteriorating in 17 of them. Free-trade-led globalization has forged an international labor market that pits Indian and American college students against one another, pushing those who can’t compete to the sidelines. Factories are shuttered in the U.S. and Europe, only to reopen in China, costing the West millions of manufacturing jobs.

Those still on the payroll in the U.S. don’t gain as much from today’s capitalism as their bosses do. A recent report by the Institute for Policy Studies, a Washington-based think tank, found that CEOs at large U.S. firms earned, on average, $10.8 million in 2010, a 28% increase from the year before, while the average worker took home $33,121, a mere 3% more. At that level, CEOs’ paychecks are 325 times bigger than their employees’. In the 1970s, CEO pay rarely topped 30 times more. “A lot of people say capitalism doesn’t work,” says Kaylee Dedrick, an Occupy Wall Street protester. “We want to see capitalism used to create more, not consolidate power into one small subset, where the rest of America is saying, ‘Where’s our slice?’”

(MORE: The Limitations of Looking at the Big Picture)

Capitalism, of course, has confronted such criticism many times before. Karl Marx famously intoned that oppression is built into the very way capitalism operates. The Great Depression was pinned on capitalism as well. Immoral bankers ran amuck through unregulated financial markets and caused the disaster, the thinking went. Yet capitalism defeated its chief rival — communism — and has absorbed more and more of the globe into its dynamic orbit. That’s because no other economic system in human history has proved more adept at generating wealth and development.

Only since the first textile looms of the Industrial Revolution began to stir has humankind climbed out of the primordial sludge of peonage and destitution into a new world of opportunity, entrepreneurship and social mobility. According to the late statistical wizard Angus Maddison, global GDP increased by a factor of seven over the first 1,820 years of the common era; since then — during the two centuries dominated by modern capitalism — it surged by more than 70 times. Capitalism has eradicated poverty on a grand scale; propelled innovation in medicine, information and transportation; and stitched together a global community through trade and finance.

A Dynamic System

one reason capitalism has been able to deliver such success, however, is that it never stays static. It has survived and thrived because it has reformed, again and again, in response to the ills of the moment. The suffering brought on by the Great Depression sparked a movement to make capitalism equitable and stable, which led to greater government protection and regulation — the New Deal and the European welfare state. Then, to overcome the stagflation of the 1970s, capitalism had to be more productive and innovative. Ronald Reagan and Margaret Thatcher ushered in an era of deregulation, free trade and free flows of capital that spawned a global economic boom. Today, amid the protracted downturn, capitalism has reached another inflection point. The world’s financial sector remains so unsound, and the pain inflicted on the average family has been so great, that capitalism needs to morph yet again, to become more inclusive and balanced and less prone to recurrent meltdowns. The question is not whether capitalism must be reformed. It is how.

(MORE: Fixing the Housing Market — What to Expect from Obama’s SOTU Speech)

On that, there is no agreement. The answer lies with the never-ending waltz of the state and market that has determined the many historical twists and turns of capitalism. Many today believe the financial crisis was caused, like the Great Depression, by capitalism gone wild, fueled by 30 years of willy-nilly deregulation. Left to their own devices, this thinking goes, bankers and executives can never be trusted to act responsibly. They’ll risk the well-being of the economy to ring up bigger profits or work people to death without paying a decent wage. The solution is a renewed government role to control the worst excesses of capitalism.

  1. Previous
  2. 1
  3. 2
2 comments
hareshp949
hareshp949

In my opinion, there is only one way to save capitalism. Limit personal income to a level which gives enough incentive to work harder and smarter but not enough incentive to do harmful things to society for short term gains. Any other method or laws will not work because people will always find ways to bypass them. Most creative people would be happy to make $200 k per year which is about 5 times the average income   but a maximum 1 million dollars should be more than sufficient for any and all creative people. When a CEO for example is allowed to make millions or billions of dollars from his decisions, he would not care about the long term cost to his company because one or two years compensation is enough to last several generations. A bank CEO would be inclined to make risky loans because he compensated for the potential gains before they are realized. The loans may never be repaid but ihis bonus is never retracted. Very similar types of things happen in other industries. In high tech a CEO can sell his company's tech know how to adversary countries for huge short term bonuses at the detriment of the future of the company and the nation. Strangely we forbid defense companies to sell know how to our enemies but we have no such rules for the equally important commercial sector. Can you imagine we allowed them to sell all the military secrets to our adversaries? 

gregjockca
gregjockca

@hareshp949 Cut the b.s. There is no way to save traditional capitalism at all. Admit it. The problem is structural. Hierarchies are inferior to networks. There is a flaw in the theory itself that has never yet accounted for the glaring reality of limited resources, nor has it ever addressed the thermodynamics of value and information.

What's coming is a complete overhaul of the status quo towards total decentralization. Centralized institutions of all kinds will be ABANDONED altogether (ie. centralized government, centralized banks, centralized state, centralized police forces, centralized academia, etc.). If you can imagine the opposite of these organizations, you will have a glimpse of the future. If not, you will be a blind man walking on the edge of a precipice.