How America Is Still Spending Stupidly

The new austerity. The great reset. The new normal. While America was suffering through the financial crisis, a chorus of economists, consumer behavior experts, and journalists predicted that the psychological scars of the Great Recession would permanent change spending habits (and they were quick to stick pithy labels on this supposed phenomenon).

But now here comes this, from WSJ.com:

A non-scientific study of Commerce Department data suggests that in February, U.S. consumers spent an annualized $1.2 trillion on non-essential stuff including pleasure boats, jewelry, booze, gambling and candy. That’s 11.2% of total consumer spending, up from 9.3% a decade earlier and only 4% in 1959, adjusted for inflation. In February, spending on non-essential stuff was up an inflation-adjusted 3.3% from a year earlier, compared to 2.4% for essential stuff such as food, housing and medicine.

During the crisis, pundits talked as if consumers would return to depression-era habits, and just hoard all the essentials. Yet, we’re now spending nearly three-times more on non-essential items than we did during the post-WWII boom. It’s surely promising that consumers are confident enough in their economic future to splurge on pleasure boats and booze. And these habits are surely good news for workers in those industries.

But if the world economy tanks again, 2008-style, let’s not forget the false promise of austerity.

Related Topics: Economy & Policy
  • Latest on Business

    Brendan McDermid / Reuters

    Facebook’s Stock Falls Below $30 for First Time

    (NEW YORK) — Facebook’s stock has fallen below $30 for the first time since its much-awaited public debut this month.

    The Jury Is Out on the EuroSlate

    U.S. consumer prices rose faster than expected in May. (Mario Anzuoni / Reuters)

    Consumer Confidence in the Economy Plunged in May

    NEW YORK — American confidence in the economy suffered the biggest drop in eight months as worries about the weak jobs, housing and stock markets rattled them again. The decline comes after a few months of optimism amid some positive economic news.

  • danallen2

    Yeah, all my middle class neighbors are buying yachts and diamond jewelry. They’re crazy. Their paychecks are going down and they’re still buying that stuff. They should take some advice from the top 15 whose income is rising exponentially but they aren’t buying yachts and diamond jewelry.

  • http://leelanaucapital.com sbanicki

    This was first published in November 2008

    We are at a watershed moment in our economic history. We are in a recession but the way we do business after the recovery will be different from the post-recoveries over the last 70-years.

    In the past, we worked our way out of a recession with the help of the federal government providing some kind of stimulus package. In one to three years, the economy was back on a growth track and there were no serious, long-term casualties. We continued to spend and consume as in the past. http://www.freeourfreemarkets.org/2010/12/hangovers-hurt.html#more

  • hoosierkevin13

    The phrase “spending stupidly” is an unjustified judgment in the case of this article. Firstly, consumers are spending according to their preferences, which is how markets work. If you think this is stupid, justify it. There is no mention of excessive spending on credit, which was one of the causes of the recession. Spending on booze and yachts and jewelry and candy can only cause growth, and therefore is rational in a macro-economic sense. It is also clearly rational in a micro sense, and I’ll refer you to this article from The Economist Free Exchange Blog if you think that these consumer preferences are not rational.

    http://www.economist.com/blogs/freeexchange/2011/04/banerjee_and_duflo_1

    Maybe we should refrain from judging the “stupidity” of the American consumer until we really understand the motivations and consequences.

  • http://rodgermmitchell.wordpress.com Rodger Malcolm Mitchell

    Today, for our Monetarily Sovereign nation , austerity is nuts. There are two key questions in economics, regarding Monetarily Sovereign nations:
    1. How much can the government deficit spend?
    2. How much should the government deficit spend?

    The answer to #1 is: An infinite amount.
    The answer to #2 is: Enough to grow the economy but not enough to cause inflation.

    So federal deficit spending always should be a compromise between economic growth and inflation. Today, lack of growth, not inflation, is our major problem, so we should be deficit spending more.

    If/when inflation were to become a problem, we will have two choices:

    1. We can reduce federal deficit spending and/or
    2. We can increase interest rates to increase the value of the dollar.

    Both would work, though history shows that reduced deficit spending causes recessions and increased interest rates do not.

    Today is a foolish time to be taking actions to prevent inflation when we really should be taking actions to grow the economy.

    Rodger Malcolm Mitchell

  • http://stephenpoo.wordpress.com stephenpoo

    Those items mentioned that people are buying are items people buy to try and make one’s self feel good or better about life.
    All pleasure items that could be saying we really feel shitty and are lost.
    Which makes sense all considering

  • http://leelanaucapital.com sbanicki

    An alcoholic is not weened off his habit overnight.http://goo.gl/RZqpV

  • http://bigbaddog.wordpress.com bigbaddog

    I live in the slum and all my friends are buying yachts, diamond rings, mink coats, and condoms in genuine gold wrapping foil!

  • vstillwell

    Lately, I’ve been questioning the quality of the content on Time’s website. Now, I know it’s starting to stink. Gregory, what world do you live in? Try getting out of NYC or whatever enclave you’re living in. Geesh. I’m not buyting boats, expensive booze or jewerly and, frankly, nobody I know is either. We’re all just holding on, hoping for the best. Maybe the top 20 or 30 percent are buying that junk, but the rest of us aren’t. Try backing up your analysis with some more analysis. For example: what income brackets are buying that crap? That would be a more thorough anaylsis than making sweeping generalizations about American consumers.

    How the hell are we supposed to get out of our mess without a press that even tries to find out what’s really happening? Stop puking out studies and reports on here without any analysis.

  • tyrantking

    Come on, how can you buy TOO much candy

  • Dirk

    Hey Rodger, you are totally making sense now! Me too, I believe in Keynes! (for the current US situation)

    On topic: I must agree with hoosierkevin13. The preferences of the consumer are what they are. The idea of a free market is that people know what is good for them. I don’t like the idea of being in a crappy appartement in a bad neighbourhood so I can have a boat, but if someone else does, that is not stupid. Buying candy instead of veggies? Mamie would be against that, but hey, it is their problem, not mine.

    Just don’t mortgage your house to buy porto.

  • atm0spheric

    Hmmm … Stupid?

    If one American makes a gift of money to another American it won’t affect the American economy as a whole.

    It just means there is one nice American here.

    And that does make America nice, I suppose – or at least nicer.

    If one American gives another American money in return for a trinket, what does that mean? At most it might mean there is one stupid American if the trinket is worthless even to her, but it would be a brave man who says she is spending stupidly, especially if she doesn’t think so.

    And a brave columnist who extrapolates to say America is spending stupidly.

    This spending won’t have any effect on the American economy as a whole – however many of us join in. The only difference from the gifting case is another American is gifting a worthless trinket in the other direction at the same time. And arguably (s)he could be a smart American.

    Now before I work out our GDP, what do you want the answer to be? I have some really nice green paper trinkets to sell at face value.

  • http://rbmatudan.wordpress.com rbmatudan

    I shudder of what America will look like by the end of this decade into the next one because this debt load is a tumor and at some point cutting the tumor will be too late and the operation will be messy.

    We help Americans find jobs and prosperity in Asia. Visit http://www.pathtoasia.com/jobs1/ for details.

blog comments powered by Disqus