Is Inflation Here to Stay? Price Rise Nears a 30-year High

A gas sign in Maui, Hawaii, where prices are nearing $5 a gallon. (Mike Blake/Reuters)
A signboard displays the price of gas in the town of Paia, in Maui, Hawaii April 8, 2011. A recent Reuters poll found long-term expectations for the food and fuel prices that have pushed inflation higher in recent month are on the rise. Consumers meanwhile complain that food and gasoline consume too much of their income, forcing difficult decisions to stay within budgets. REUTERS/Mike Blake (UNITED STATES - Tags: ENERGY POLITICS TRANSPORT BUSINESS)

OK. So I will admit it. I finally have a touch of inflation fever. But it’s just a touch. Sniffles.

The government reported the Consumer Price Index, the most important monthly gauge of inflation, on Friday for March and it showed that inflation is rising at the fastest pace in more than a year. On average, prices are up 2.7% in the past 12-months. But if you take the past four months alone, prices are on pace to rise nearly 6% a year. That’s the fastest jump for inflation in nearly 30 years. The last time inflation topped 6% was in 1982.

So why don’t I have a full-blown case of inflation fever? Here’s why:

The main culprit, probably unsurprisingly to anyone who drives a car, in pushing up inflation is gas prices, up an amazing 28% in the past year. Food prices were up, as well, but not nearly as much, just 2.9%. Take away food and energy, and inflation was basically non-existent in March, up just 0.1%. By that measure inflation is on pace to be up just 1.2% in the next year, which is among the lowest rates of price increases in decades.

The Federal Reserve gets routinely criticized for making its policy decisions on this later figure of inflation, which excludes food and energy and is called core inflation. The rebuke is that, yes, there’s no inflation as long as you don’t have to eat anything or drive anywhere. Actually if you buy anything that is shipped, what you pay is likely to somewhat be affected by the price of gas. The question is to what point and how long?

The Fed looks at core inflation because it’s usually a better indicator of where prices are headed. That’s why it’s fair, even though it might seem absurd that the inflation gauge the Fed favors excludes the basic things that everyone has to buy. Spikes in food and energy just don’t seem to translate into overall price increases. The reason is gas price and food price increases, at least big jumps, tend not to last that long. And when they do, overall inflation usually drops quickly.

But what if the recent rise in oil, food and commodities in general doesn’t go away anytime soon. At least for food prices, I buy the argument that a growing, richer world population could keep food prices high for some time. Oil could be the same story. Then I think we may end up having an inflation problem. Indeed, some think high gas prices are already dragging down the economy. I haven’t done it, but I would bet that if you lengthen the time period on David Leonhardt’s graph from his NY Times econ blog in the link above you would find that the inflation figure that includes gas would do a better job of predicting coming inflation in periods when energy prices are rising steadily. So the question for inflation is are we in one of those periods or not. To be sure, gas prices have risen a lot recently. But whether that rise will continue is yet to be seen.

Related Topics: gas, inflation, Economy & Policy
  • Latest on Business

    Brendan McDermid / Reuters

    Facebook’s Stock Falls Below $30 for First Time

    (NEW YORK) — Facebook’s stock has fallen below $30 for the first time since its much-awaited public debut this month.

    The Jury Is Out on the EuroSlate

    U.S. consumer prices rose faster than expected in May. (Mario Anzuoni / Reuters)

    Consumer Confidence in the Economy Plunged in May

    NEW YORK — American confidence in the economy suffered the biggest drop in eight months as worries about the weak jobs, housing and stock markets rattled them again. The decline comes after a few months of optimism amid some positive economic news.

  • http://rodgermmitchell.wordpress.com Rodger Malcolm Mitchell

    Contrary to the debt hawks, inflation is, and has been, related to oil prices, not to federal deficit spending. The proof is at Cause of Inflation

    Rodger Malcolm Mitchell

  • http://thefaintofheart.wordpress.com João Marcus Marinho Nunes

    Stephan
    Pop an Advil while there´s only a “touch of I fever”. Don´t get hooked on “cynical arguments”.
    http://thefaintofheart.wordpress.com/2011/04/15/what-would-the-%e2%80%9ccynics%e2%80%9d-have-done/

    http://thefaintofheart.wordpress.com/2011/04/15/cynics-galore/

  • http://thefaintofheart.wordpress.com João Marcus Marinho Nunes

    Rodger
    The “oil is guilty” thing was always a convinient cop out to policymakers!
    http://thefaintofheart.wordpress.com/2011/02/04/it%c2%b4s-all-about-spending/

  • http://rodgermmitchell.wordpress.com Rodger Malcolm Mitchell

    Joao,

    I guess you didn’t see at the graphs at Cause of inflation.

    You are right that inflation can have multiple causes, but there is one big cause that seems to set everything in motion, and that is oil pricing. I suspect that because of the rise in oil prices, and if prices don’t come down, we are about to feel inflation, which the Fed will fight with increased interest rates.

    Rodger Malcolm Mitchell

  • jkhc

    This is not a good sign ! One must be careful not to let the situation deteriorate into the worst of all scenarios which would be high inflation with high interest rates, high unemployment and slow growth ending in stagnation.

    Joseph K.H. Cheng.

  • http://thefaintofheart.wordpress.com João Marcus Marinho Nunes

    Rodger
    I never said I think inflation can have multiple causes! Inflation has ONE cause: Higher growth in money supply relative to demand. The “multiple causes” is a popular myth.
    The graphs at Cause of Inflation are not very useful to tell you the truth. If you read the post I linked you to you should be convinced that to have inflation – sustained increase in ALL prices – you have got to have money fueling the process.
    Check out this other post. It may help put you “in the right path”!
    http://thefaintofheart.wordpress.com/2011/04/11/no-consensus-on-inflation/

    Cheers

  • josephmateus

    Mr. Rodger Malcolm Mitchell, João is right and you are totally wrong, as usual. You should ask youself why are the oil prices going up like crazy again? Its not supply and demand, becuase if Lybia produces 1 million less barrel, Saudi arabia gladly will produce a million extra. If China increased oil demand by 10%, supply will increase 10%..after all, oil producing nations are in business to sell oil, and th more oil they sell to meet the demand, the more money they make.

    The real reason why the price of oil is going up is becuase excessive speculation in the stock markets with all this funny fiat created out of nothing dollars that Helicopter Ben Bernanke showers daily over Wall Street from the sky above, and making this funny fiat dollars free with this most ridiculous zero interest rates. Speculators are all hedging their bets buying up oil and ohter commodities stocks, thus drive their prices up; at the same time this escessive money creation out of nothing + zero interest rates are spooking investors world wide making them dump their US dollar denominated assets and switching to other more stable currencies who nations control their money supply and offer much better interest rates to these investors, thus devaluating the US dollar. Now as all commodities inclufing oil are priced in US dollars, the dollar devaluating further
    raises their price, because
    now
    you need more dollars to get the same amount of the
    same commodity.

    And, by the way, that knowledgeable intelligent comentator’s name is João with the accent on top of the “a” not Joao.

    You have to switch your keyboard to Portuguese, then the hold the “shift” keyat the same time you press the | key, just below the “backspace” key
    then immediately press the “a”key afterwars to get the ~ on top of the “a” – (ã).

  • http://leelanaucapital.com sbanicki

    If you define inflation as the general rise of rise, they will rise over time because global demand is rising and this will put pressure on natural resources. They will be rising also because of the consolidation of markets and the lessening of competition. http://freeourfreemarkets.org

  • waynebernard

    Here is an examination showing how massive increases in the price of food items in most of the world is having an impact on consumer spending that will ultimately affect the world’s economy:

    http://viableopposition.blogspot.com/2011/04/food-price-inflation-who-is-suffering.html

  • http://vaengineer.wordpress.com vaengineer

    Every time I see a business headline celebrating some success in the stock market, reduction in unemployment or some economic indicator showing positive, I always see another headine that follows it. This headline inevitably reads: ‘Oil prices increase on signs of economic upturn’. It seems like we can’t have one without the other.

    The only way to stop the increase in oil prices is to stop economic growth. Pick your poison.

  • http://rbmatudan.wordpress.com rbmatudan

    Without a balanced budget amendment and restrictions on taxes, all of americas assets would be spent in short order. Currently, it’s only borrowed money. Let the government get their hands on yours, and it’s gone.

    We help Americans find jobs and prosperity in Asia. Visit http://www.pathtoasia.com/jobs1/ for details.

  • http://seabeemcb1.wordpress.com seabeemcb1

    With the price of gas at $4+ it’s time for me to find other transportation. I found a great site on the internet for getting the best deal on a motorcycle without the hassle of going from dealer to dealer and spending gas and time.It is http://motorcyclefinderonline.com You should check it out.

  • http://nlr2699.wordpress.com nlr2699

    Thanks for the tip! I went to Motorcycle Finder Online, and I was able to get a great deal on a great used motorcycle. I will recommend anyone there. http://www.motorcyclefinderonline.com

  • 94134gamesmith

    Gamesmith94134: debt-problem-means-for-the-global-economy
    “As the system works now, the national debt is a welfare program run for and by bankers and bond traders.”, I found that the statement is not adequate as a welfare program for the banker only even after we bailed them out with the TARP; and they can get billion dollars in bonuses afterward. It was lifesaver for Americans after the S&L and our sub-prime housing in the 90s, it was the stimuli program that lifted us out of the recession. It was the costs of the bonds were sold twenty years ago, while we the American enjoyed the sub-prime housing and the MedClub program to stimulate the global growth just to get out of the recession. We did have our time in the years of surplus in the 90’s. Of course, our FED ran the lesser interest rates on bonds and loans to bank to sustain the claims on most of the natural resources throughout the world. And, we complain of the exchange rate that makes our trade imbalance; later, our industries found it profitable if we can move our factories to China with our politicians breaking grounds. So, it was not a welfare program for banker and bond traders only; it was we the Americans and our politicians too.
    In China the central government controls the economy. In this country, our economy is controlled more and more by oligopolies controlling large industries. These oligopolies control our politicians by egregious campaign contributions. This is more lethal because the public still believes we have free markets, http://goo.gl/7yH0A by sbanicki .
    It was the costs of the bonds were sold twenty years ago, while we the American enjoyed the sub-prime housing and the MedClub program to stimulate the global growth just to get out of the recession. We did have our time in the years of surplus in the 90’s; so I would blame on the bankers or the bond traders, if we continue to use the formula as just being the supplier to the world with lesser on our human resources. Instead, we must rely on the oligopolies and our government officials to forward a disciplinary action to invest in America and reverse its human resources condition to cut unemployment.
    It is questionable if we the Americans or the G7 would made the desirable formula on the monetarily sovereignty nations as the supplier of the resource through the A&M and the emerging market as the labor force in production and foundation for investment made the balance of all trading nations. However, the rise of the living standard of China with its 30% raise in labor cost made or 5-7% interest may not sufficient to capture the depreciated dollar and QEII, that inflation is causing the problem for Chinese government. As the shortage on the cash flow after the pursuit of the A&M in the banking industries made them vulnerable and short change on the local industries and business. Currently the unemployment contribute to the uncertainty on the future that the real estate is still falling and the depreciation of dollar relatively to the globally interest rate exchange competitiveness if Fed would continue on the QEII or let the cost of loan idle in supplying the low cost dollars in the emerging markets.
    Then, Eurodollar is on the role to balance the labor cost that made A&M valid claims through the industries within the emerging market nations with surpluses. Later, it was real estate, durable goods of a sort including the corporations in the emerging markets so profitable with our investment that raise the margin at the labor cost and disrupted the standard of living within. It was our claim to make the balance of trade by achieving demand through the domestic consumption and import of our goods to cut off the surplus. In evaluation of the formula to balance trade, that monetarily sovereignty nation as the supplier of natural resources, financial and technology transfer made our industries worsen in the displacement of human resources created larger unemployment in our advanced nations. Since our dependency on the cut on the labor cost, we flooded the emerging markets with such excessiveness that made our real estate foreclosure and debt crisis more serve. So, supplier minus labor did not make the exchange easier or balance the trade; and the rising cost of the supplies and investment also made the commodities both the consumer goods and durable goods more expensive that inflationary control is not sustainable even after the rational upscale on their labor. Then, the further imbalance among the nations would continue; and protectionism or trade war is not inevitable.
    The concept of ‘American exceptionalism’ is the relic of a bye gone era and unless the present crisis is not tackled efficiently, ‘the world financial “melt down’ will start rolling!!! vayakkattil
    At the height of inflation to China and India, I am not surprise of the withdrawal of the support on dollar that created the situation on protectionism, even after the warning from PIMCO and S&P that sovereign debts must be taken care of. So, US may have to provide a proper budget and stop the invasion of the undervalued dollars to disrupt the global economy. Otherwise, currencies exchange rate adjustment only is irrelevant to stop the “meltdown”, it is the trade war that is going to ruin everything. Instead, we must rely on the oligopolies and our government officials to forward a disciplinary action to invest in America and reverse its human resources condition to cut unemployment.
    Hopefully, I think the FED should reconsider its policies on A&M, metro bonds and so on. We may suffer sooner more painful from further depreciation that inflation on all consumer goods and depreciation of dollar and durable goods can both happen at a same time. Interest rate can be the measure on how we discipline and return to reality instead how the best of time and worst of time is defined.
    Complacency is detrimental to the leading economy in the world. Neither should one fare on the auspices of other people alone without one’s own efforts. By JKHC
    Can we say free trade or fair trade? No free lunches, Right.
    May the Buddha bless you?

  • 94134gamesmith

    Mr. waynebernand,
    http://viableopposition.blogspot.com/2011/04/food-price-inflation-who-is-suffering.html
    After half way through the data, it just took me days in pondering how the world turns their heads with inflation and who is suffering from the circumstance. I agree with all six recommendations and suggest we, our research teams and the World Bank must seek common denominators in achieving the best results. My observation on speculation on the commodities is the instrumental cause that free trade must have its limits; and we must pool the foundation in the general agreement to promote fair trade that restores the sovereign right to void further abuses.
    May the Buddha bless you?

blog comments powered by Disqus