Number of Problem Banks in America Nears 1,000

(Getty Images)

The financial crisis seems to be far from over for the nation’s smaller banks.

Two and a half years after the bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers, the number of banks that are still facing serious financial problems continues to rise, and is now nearing the four digits. According to Calculated Risk, the number of banks in the U.S. that are in danger of failing hit 985 last week, the highest level since the beginning of the financial crisis. That’s up from 935 at the beginning of the year, just three months ago. When Calculated Risk began compiling its list of troubled banks back in mid-2009, the number of banks in trouble in the US was just under 400. In a little less than two years, nearly 600 additional banks have slipped into the danger zone. (That’s on top of the few hundred that have actually failed.) And that number appears to be getting bigger.

The good news is that unless you live in the town where they reside, most of the banks that are slipping into trouble now are ones that most of us have never heard of. The latest additions to Calculated Risk’s list include Plumas Bank of Quincy, Calif.; Country Bank of Aledo, IL; and First Financial Bank, Bessemer, AL. Plumas Bank is the largest and is actually publicly traded. But it has just under $500 million in loans and other assets. For comparison, Citigroup, one of the banks in major trouble at the beginning of the downturn, had just over $2 trillion in assets at the beginning of the downturn.

So why are so many small banks still in trouble? First of all they didn’t get the full backing of the U.S. government to pull them out of trouble like the large banks did. Second, a number bigger percentage of the loans at small banks are commercial loans. And while the big banks have had a lot of trouble refinancing mortgages, that’s nothing compared to what it takes to refinance a commercial property. Developers would rather cut and run than refinance a loan that is well under water. It’s not like a homeowner who fights to stay in the house that they live. What’s more commercial loans are often based on rents, and with few companies spending money on expansions, and consumer spending growing but still relatively weak, retail and office space rents are still way down.

So while the earnings at the big banks look a lot better than they did back in 2008, the large and still growing list of banks across the U.S. that are still in trouble is a reminder that the financial sector, and intern the economy, is far from recovered.

Related Topics: Wall Street & Markets
  • Latest on Business

    Brendan McDermid / Reuters

    Facebook’s Stock Falls Below $30 for First Time

    (NEW YORK) — Facebook’s stock has fallen below $30 for the first time since its much-awaited public debut this month.

    The Jury Is Out on the EuroSlate

    U.S. consumer prices rose faster than expected in May. (Mario Anzuoni / Reuters)

    Consumer Confidence in the Economy Plunged in May

    NEW YORK — American confidence in the economy suffered the biggest drop in eight months as worries about the weak jobs, housing and stock markets rattled them again. The decline comes after a few months of optimism amid some positive economic news.

  • http://stephenpoo.wordpress.com stephenpoo

    OK I’m Curious
    What is the big picture in this whole system?
    The orginal package was to fund big banks and those who became banks because they were cash poor and could then lend out to borrowers.
    The Federal Reserve I gather can give orders to the Treasury to print money which the Fed can distribute, did I get this right so far?
    The Fed bought some toxic assetts off the Banks and also made loans to them at zero to 1/4% interest rates.
    The Banks were invited to buy Treasury Bills with the loan funds, so in effect they are receiving interest on money they were loaned for free.
    Did I get this wrong?
    So who here really needs the printed money?
    Are the Banks in really bad shape need free money?
    (hard to belive since they want to pay stockholders dividends and excecutives bonuses)
    Does the Fed buying assets really need the money? (they are a mystery to me)
    Is it the Government who really needs the funds?(they always need money)
    All of the above maybe and is this the best way to get it done?
    Maybe I have it all wrong somebody please explain?

  • 94134gamesmith

    Gamesmith94134: Number of Problem Banks in America Nears 1,000
    Mr. Stephenpoo,
    Two years ago, 1500 banks failed the stress test to meet the reseves standards, thanks to QEII we are improving. What FED did was to buying time since China and emerging market nations neglect the call on appreciating their currencies to develop a leverage to ease the US trade deficits. Then, we failed in the tourism deal around the world; then, we realize $500 a night is excessive for tourist and merchants. Loans for hotels and resorts are unpaid.,12 billion sent to EU. Then, we buy commodities and durable goods to raise the cost of production for China and created inflation on the consumer goods for everyone after the route of production completed and exported to US.
    Instead, dollars depreciated but Renminbi, Euros remained. Instead of being trumped by dollars, China and other pulled out to Australia, Swiss and Canada. Then, your theory comes to reality:
    The Fed bought some toxic assetts off the Banks and also made loans to them at zero to 1/4% interest rates.
    The Banks were invited to buy Treasury Bills with the loan funds, so in effect they are receiving interest on money they were loaned for free. By Steptenpoo.
    That being said, this remains true: it’s because the dollar is becoming more worthless, while the real cost of things stays the same. That is actually the definition of inflation.

    Read more: http://curiouscapitalist.blogs.time.com/
    Poor Mr. Bernanke, he must take on his job as Chair to Fed and palm reader for the rosy picture in 7.7 unemployment with 2% inflation. Cheer him on till there are sucker to adopt higher pricing to the contracts of the commodities in gold, silver and cotton or after 2015; then, you will see bonuses flying again in Wall Street including Banks or caput if the real estate did not hit the bottom or they cannot claim the credits on them.
    May the Buddha bless you?

  • http://rbmatudan.wordpress.com rbmatudan

    In a world where the homebuilders, the banks, the bankers, the central bankers, and the politicians get bailed out with TAXPAYER MONEY, and now, we have nothing left…

    We help Americans find jobs and prosperity in Asia. For details, visit http://www.pathtoasia.com/jobs/

blog comments powered by Disqus