Europe’s other “Germany problem”

A few weeks ago, I wrote a story for TIME magazine about Germany’s role in Europe, and how its strong competitiveness was creating imbalances within the euro zone that were at the heart of the current European debt crisis. The solution to that “Germany problem” wasn’t easy – tough reforms in both Germany and its weaker neighbors. What’s become increasingly clear as well is that Europe has another sort of “Germany problem,” this one perhaps even more dangerous, and no easier to resolve. This “problem” is how German domestic politics are determining policy for the entire euro zone, and perpetuating its debt crisis.

We saw that problem quite clearly on Friday at the end of another, unsuccessful European summit. Despite persistent boasts that they have the tools in place to solve the debt crisis, the leaders of the euro zone still haven’t finalized exactly how they intend to finance the rescue fund created to do just that. And though they have agreed on expanding its size when a permanent rescue fund comes into operation in 2013, they didn’t pin down the exact details of funding that one, either. The zone’s finance ministers had reached a deal on that issue only days earlier, but after objections back in Berlin, Chancellor Angela Merkel showed up at the summit asking for a renegotiation. She wanted to reduce up-front capital contributions from member states to the new fund and spread out commitments over a longer period of time – yet another attempt to limit Germany’s exposure to the risks of solving the euro crisis. However, now the new fund might end up short of funds to engage in a large-scale bailout, with no clear mechanism for filling in the hole. Even Merkel admitted that things were left “a little bit open.”

Merkel’s decision to put domestic political concerns above the needs of the euro zone has been a persistent feature of the crisis since it began more than a year ago, and has been a key reason why the debt crisis has proven so hard to fix. Her reluctance to bailout Greece let the contagion genie out of the bottle and allowed the debt crisis to spread to other countries. Her resistance to proposals to stabilize the debt crisis that might increase Germany’s commitments to the euro – such as the idea of a Eurobond jointly backed by the zone’s governments – has prevented more comprehensive solutions to the crisis from emerging. Now, after agreeing to expand the euro rescue fund, she’s dilly-dallying on funding it. Meanwhile, Portugal stands in the brink of a bailout, which would make the country the third euro-user to require a rescue (after Greece and Ireland). The euro crisis burns while Berlin fiddles.

Merkel’s resistance to using German resources to help out her misguided euro zone neighbors is perfectly understandable. Greeks, Spanish and Irish don’t vote for her, the German electorate does, so her first priority is always going to be Germany’s needs. But the problem is that she controls the purse strings. Whatever bailouts might be needed, Germany, as the zone’s biggest economy, is going to end up on the hook for the largest share of the money. That means she’s effectively been calling all the shots. The problem here is that she’s deciding matters for the entire euro area based on her political concerns back home. And that is just not going to work.

That’s especially true because Merkel has been demanding tough reforms from the weaker countries of the euro zone while she waffles on helping them. With Berlin controlling the decisions, the euro zone’s entire approach to the crisis has been driven by German ideas. Berlin believes the solution to the euro zone’s woes is to make the struggling economies stronger and more competitive. The bailouts have come with painful austerity measures that will condemn recipient nations to several quarters, if not even years, of meager or no growth. Merkel has also pressed for a “competitiveness pact,” a form of which was approved earlier this month, which includes euro-zone guidelines for everything from retirement ages to wage growth. Germany has also been in favor of imposing tough fines onto countries that don’t meet deficit and debt targets. In other words, Berlin’s goal is the make its neighbors more German in their economic policies. In doing so, Merkel is imposing policies on other politicians that would seriously endanger their jobs. (The prime minister who arranged Ireland’s bailout has already gotten the boot, while Portugal’s PM resigned last week when he failed to get austerity measures through parliament.) But in return for all of those painful reform promises, Merkel is offering what? An unwillingness to accept commitments that could threaten her own job.

There is no indication that Merkel’s attitude will change. After her party lost ground in an election on Sunday in a state it usually dominates, there is instead every indication her position on euro issues will harden. Europe’s second “Germany problem” will only get worse.

A German friend pointed out to me a couple days ago that Angela Merkel is Chancellor of Germany, not Europe, and thus has Germany as her first concern. That’s true. But she insists on controlling European policy as if she is Chancellor of Europe, while crafting those policies as Chancellor of Germany. Merkel must either grasp her responsibility to the wider euro zone, or remain Chancellor of only Germany, and let someone else determine the direction of Europe.

Related Topics: Economy & Policy, Wall Street & Markets
  • Latest on Business

    Brendan McDermid / Reuters

    Facebook’s Stock Falls Below $30 for First Time

    (NEW YORK) — Facebook’s stock has fallen below $30 for the first time since its much-awaited public debut this month.

    The Jury Is Out on the EuroSlate

    U.S. consumer prices rose faster than expected in May. (Mario Anzuoni / Reuters)

    Consumer Confidence in the Economy Plunged in May

    NEW YORK — American confidence in the economy suffered the biggest drop in eight months as worries about the weak jobs, housing and stock markets rattled them again. The decline comes after a few months of optimism amid some positive economic news.

  • Dirk

    Merkel must either grasp her responsibility to the wider euro zone, or remain Chancellor of only Germany, and let someone else determine the direction of Europe.

    She can’t do A, because she would loose her job, and her replacer sure won’t do it. She can’t do B, because German voters would also kick her out for not defending German interests.

    No, it is what is.

    This proofs that you can not have economic integration without political integration. For better decision taking, a European government is needed. Not the “Holy Roman Emperor” style like Van Rompuy now, but a direct election, with real powers. Yes, meaning an end to souveranity for the member states.

  • http://rodgermmitchell.wordpress.com Rodger Malcolm Mitchell

    “Merkel’s decision to put domestic political concerns above the needs of the euro zone has been a persistent feature of the crisis since it began more than a year ago, and has been a key reason why the debt crisis has proven so hard to fix.”

    Don’t blame Germany. They have been doing exactly what a monetarily non-sovereign nation is forced to do, for survival: Emphasize exports.

    The debt crisis is hard to fix simply because monetarily non-sovereign governments continually must have money flowing in from outside their borders, and mathematically this ranges between unlikely and impossible for all to do so.

    The EU debt crisis was inevitable when the EU nations gave up their Monetary Sovereignty. I predicted this way back in a June 5th, 2005 speech at the UMKC, when I said, “Because of the Euro, no European nation can control its own money supply. The Euro is the worst economic idea since the recession-era, Smoot-Hawley Tariff. The economies of European nations are doomed by the Euro.”

    Right on target.

    The solution to the European debt crisis is not to ask Germany to be Europe’s Daddy, nor is it self-defeating “austerity.” Rather, it is to:

    1. Restore Monetary Sovereignty to the EU nations
    or
    2. Have the EU supply a continuing flow of euros to its euro nations — a flow large enough to allow for economic and population growth plus modest inflation.

    Rodger Malcolm Mitchell

  • http://jaguar6cy.wordpress.com jaguar6cy

    If this problem occurred in the USA liberal economic theory would dictate that the “rich” Germany should be taxed so that their “wealth” could be spread in a more “fair and equitable” manner. After all, what right does Germany have to a successful economy when so many others don’t have as much success. This would be the economic theory of liberals, democrats and academics applied to real life. It is rather difficult being a liberal because their theories are based only on what sounds good rather than what will actually work.

  • http://rodgermmitchell.wordpress.com Rodger Malcolm Mitchell

    Right, the Robin Hood theory of economics has not worked, cannot work and will not work. Yet, even many sophisticated economists recommend taxing the rich to “pay for” social programs.

    The fact that the federal government uses neither taxes nor borrowing to “pay for” anything, does not seem to penetrate. It simply is too counter-intuitive — something like refusing to understand how Australians don’t fall off the bottom of the earth.

    Rodger Malcolm Mitchell

  • 94134gamesmith

    Gamesmith94134: Portugal and the political perils of austerity
    In the review on the Special Report “The revolution in the Central Banking” and both “Entering a brave new macroprudential world”:

    “The interplay with governments — whatever the statutes say about the supreme independence of the European Central Bank — is a fact of life,” …… “The mistakes and miscalculations of the last 12 years show how monetary union has to be part of a more united political system in Europe. That is not loss of independence. That is political and economic reality.”
    “For a generation, the accepted orthodoxy has been to focus on taming inflation. Financial stability has taken something of a back seat. Now, whether mandated to do so or not, western central banks have bought up sovereign debt to sustain the financial
    system, printed money by the truckload to stimulate their economies, sacrificed some of their independence to coordinate monetary policy more closely with fiscal decisions, and contemplated new ways of preventing asset bubbles.”

    I see more the disintegrating factors on the 27 EU nations that PIIGS developed the debt crisis; and inflation and deflation are the not containable through the scrutiny of the orthodoxy views from the ECB or FED, and their currencies are infected from the rising cost on the imports of the emerging market nations. Then, they lost their independence and jurisprudence on the values on either euro or dollar; even at the Japan earthquake and Tsunami, yen had also lost its own yardstick by the GDP ratio.
    From now on, I see more on the double currencies in the EU till each must adopt another system that can maintain the fluidity and control on the values on the durable goods and assets from deflation regionally. In addition, the inflationary consumer goods and food supply may cause the social unease throughout Europe if the commodities goods cannot sustain in a unison term.

    Perhaps, there is a breakdown on ECB and FED that the memberships on nations would fall to depression that Euro and dollar may appreciate faster after the emerging market nations keep building up its reserves from its loans to PIIGS. Can they see it as in crisis if they are appreciated more and faster just because the lower interests rates? More bandages put on the European Financial Stability Facility (EFSF)? I expected ECB would fail to restructure Euro after June if the inflation hit hard after appreciated more, By August , it would come to its decision point of the future of EU of the less euro. I hope they can see through the bird’s eye.

    May the Buddha bless you?

  • 94134gamesmith

    Gamesmith94134: Europe’s other Germany problem

    The euro depreciated for a second day against the dollar after German Chancellor Angela Merkel’s coalition was defeated in a regional election.
    • The dollar strengthened 0.5 percent to 81.75 yen as of 8:55 a.m. in New York.
    • The euro slipped 0.3 percent to $1.4043, after reaching $1.4021, the least since March 18.
    • The yen depreciated 0.2 percent to 114.80 per euro.
    By Bloomberg News
    As the curse remained, it does not go only to Socrates or other politicians in the EU. If the dominoes effect takes place, Ms Merkel is clearly stands on the edge to fall. Forsake of the global economy, we must stop the currencies warfare to forward reality. It would be an understatement if we focus on the EU and the debt crisis only and miss the bigger picture that we entangled the orthodoxy in particular we no longer have control of it.
    Gamesmith94134: The Dark Ages, Returned In Full Nov. 8, 2010, 6:46 AM

    In Chinese idioms, there is a word that best suit for our situation, “draw a biscuit to cure the starved”. This is how we lived on credit for so long, it is so vague. I also like the letter by Warren Buffet to Uncle Sam that ‘Pretty Good for Government Work’ that he gave his word on the Apocalypse now to our assets on commercial paper and real estates. Does a bigger biscuit need to cure the larger starve?
    Just forget how hard we trumped China to raise the renminbi to relieve the deficit or cut its surplus? There is not any financial tool that we, American, can apply; in the lesser of, interest rate or real estate that we are sub-prime now. More liquidity to the money supply with no intermediate industry to revive, it is more biscuit for American and more inflation to the EM nations. Devaluation of dollar or real estate can only make US business more anemic; because they depend on credit too. Monetarism is only an idea that can be applied a measurement to what is being produced and it is not a product you can consume. Actually, QEII acts perfectly in its enclosed environment like North Korea where there is only one authority; but when it mixed other currencies; it is counterproductive because we cannot make other pay on their investment to America. Does Mr. Bernanke or Mr. Geithner know Uno-dollar can kill if the inflation on the EM nations persists? Inflation will halt all progress if the EM nations suffer further invasion by the leverage on EQII; then, the world recession is not too far. I mean totally, not even China with the most surplus, it has already outspent itself with domestic development.
    Perhaps, it is time that they must convince them that habitat counts. Debts and trades are individual matter that currencies must come to a common ground that each must allow to survive under its condition and limit. We must be more sensitive on the issues individual to compromise after each raise its questions on requirements to survive and each set on limits on monopoly. If we can guarantee a mutual understanding on the ethical standard that doing business can be cooperative and harmonious in its separated but equal manner. Then, currencies can go back to its origin as a measurement on transaction, instead of another tool for invasion.
    The Currencies warfare ends if we all can settle on its own ground with the benefits from trades with others. Money counts and you don’t eat.
    May the Buddha bless you?

  • josephmateus

    Mr. Rodger Malcolm Mitchell, you wrote above – quote > “The fact that the federal government uses neither taxes nor borrowing to “pay for” anything, does not seem to penetrate. It simply is too counter-intuitive” < unquote –

    Please stop being so preposterous and ridiculous. You live in a total Pollyanna dream world, in fact I believe that you live in denial of reality in a parallel fantasy world….the truth is just too bitter and too hard for you to face … so you just live in your make believe fantasy world, in order not to suffer the pain of living in reality. So you believe that the federal government is just going through the motions of taxing and borrowing just to make it look good, when in reality it doesn't need to? That its all just a well orchestrated mean devious act? After all, even you have to admit the the Federal government does tax its citizens and heavily borrows money from foreign countries….that you cannot deny, its a fact.

    So the question you have to ask yourself is: Why does the federal government tax and heavily borrows from abroad when it doesn't need to, when it can just create the money out of thin air to pay all its bills and obligations? How come I am so bright and so intelligent, how come I alone Rodger Malcolm Mitchell have the magical solution to all our debts and tax problems by just monetizing all our debts and obligations with freshly created new money and everybody else is so dumb and stupid that they just can't discern it?

    Your question begs the correct answer and you have to admit to yourself: After waking up from my rosy Pollyanna dream make believe fantasy world and finally finding the guts to face reality, now I realize that in fact I am the only stupid dumb one here; in fact it is ONLY my brain that cannot penetrate, not the other way around. Now I finally realize that the Curious Capitalist blog is the town square and I am the town square idiot.

  • josephmateus

    ps56penn62pr64, you wrote me asking me questions in the previous Curious Capitalist blog entitled “Portugal and the political perils of austerity” :

    Your questions: – QUOTE: > “Are you saying you find no difference between a for-profit banking cartel, created by its shareholders and having a fiduciary responsibility to work exclusively for their benefit and our sovereign government established for the common good of the people?” < UNQUOTE -

    ——————————————————————–
    Answer:
    No, no, that is not what I am saying at all. First of all you have to learn what kind of institution the Federal Reserve Bank is. You are simply shooting darts in the dark. Without learning how to walk, you simply cannot run. The Federal Reserve Bank is NOT a for profit banking cartel and does not have a fiduciary responsiblity to work exclusively for the benefit of private banks. Rather it is an institution created by the federal government, running by the will and authority of the federal government albeit it has a autonomous status: Its function is to provide the private banks with liquidity in the form of low interest rate loans, thus it partially controls interest rates by controling how much interest it charges the private banks. In turn, by controlling interest rates, the Fed can stimulate the economy and fight inflation as well as influence the stock market – when interest rates rise, stocks and bonds lose value, when interest rates are very low, it creates bubbles of speculation in the stock market as well as in bonds, the currency depreciates and inflation rises. Its job is also control the money supply, by providing more liquidity to the financial system in times of need when it deems necessary – for example, after 9/11 and the YK2 millenuem bug – and then withdrawing excess liquidity after conditions allow it in order to maintain a sound currency value.

    Note that this are the purposes and mandate of having a Federal Reserve central bank, not what "helicopter" Ben Bernanke has been doing in the last few years, doubling the nation money supply in less that two years, and continuing to create money wantonly out of thin air, thus seriously endangering the value of the dollar with the resulting hyperinflation. By loading his helicopter daily with lots of freshly printed fiat dollars, taking off, hovering above Wall Street and showering all this free cheap money to the speculators below, Ben Bernanke is simply very seriously abusing its autonomous power giving to him by the federal government and is playing in dangerous waters inside a leaky boat.

    This does not mean that he and the institution he runs are in cahouts with the private banks and that Bernanke is the chief of a insidious nefarious banking cartel. No, he is not. Ben Bernanke is a public servant working for a autonomous divison of the federal government. His institution was put in place and given authority by the federal government, not the private banks. By the will and authority of the federal government the Fed itself is paying his salary, not the private banks.

    Thus the Federal Reserve Bank was established by the federal government with the above mentioned mandate to represent the federal government in its mandate for the common good of the people, and there is absolutely nothing sinister nor pernicious about this.The federal government decided to delegated this authority to the Fed because it is too busy running the other affairs of the nation.

    But the point here is this: If there was no Federal Reserve then the federal government would be doing exactly the same very thing as the Fed: Creating and controlling the money supply, setting interest rates and providing necessary liquidity to the economy through the private banks. Thus the Federal Reserve is an autonomous division of the Federal Government, existing by the will and authority of the federal government and is no part of a banking cartel working exclusively in cahouts with the private banks…its fudiciary responsibility is to work exclusively for the benefit of the Federal government and the nation, not the shareholders of private banks.

    ——————————————————————-

    "Do you agree with our spending $8 trillion to the central bank at the heart of that cartel just to create the basis of their money?"

    —————————————————————–
    Answer:
    As explained above, the Federal Reserve is an autonomous institution with specific goals, mandate and objectives. It is no heart nor part of any nefarious devious banking cartel. You have been watching too many conspiracy movies. The federal government through the taxpayers is not spending nor did it ever spent $8 trillion to create the basis of their money. Quite the contrary, it is the Federal Reserve themselves who created the basis for their money, who create the present money, who is supposed to control the money supply, and create liquidity for the economy in times of need, while withdrawing such excess liquidity when it is no longer warranted. The taxpayers are not paying anything at all to the Fed. The Fed pays itself, because it is monetary sovereign, it is the very source of the money.

    ——————————————————————-

    "Do you agree that allowing that cartel to create the entire $55.7 trillion money supply as debt, charging 5% interest on the total debt, requiring a $2.75 trillion annual interest payment, and paying the entire money supply to the bank as interest in fewer than twenty years? Do the math."

    ——————————————————————–
    Answer:
    You're the one who needs to do the math big time. What you wrote is simply irresponsible, preposterous, distorted an devious. The Federal Reserve did not create $55.7 trillion money supply as debt. No, in fact the money supply is not the debt. The money supply is the amount of dollars in circulation. The national debt and deficits are something else – what you are saying is that you are eating a pineapple when in fact your are eating an orange. While an gross excess of the money supply devaluates the currency and causes hyperinflation, the debt is simply the result of spending more money than what the government brings in revenue. When the government spends say $1.5 trillion more in a fiscal year than what it brings in revenue, that is called a 1.5 trillion deficit.

    Contrary to what your guru Rodger Malcolm Mitchell teaches you, this deficits simply do not vanish, and do not go away, They are added to the accumulated national debt. Thus, if the previous year the government was $13 trillion in accumulated immediate debt, now after running this $1.5 trillion deficit in this last fiscal year the accumulated debt is now $14.5 trillion, and so forth. Now in order to maintain a sense of credibility with international investors, the federal government issue Treasury Bills, in other words, it sells its debt to investors in return of fixed interest rate payments. Investors thus buy this debt, and maintain the relative value of the dollar and allow the federal government to continue with its unabated spending of lot more than what it brings in.

    But this procedure only works for so long….in time, if the government doesn't control its yearly deficits, and the accumulated debt grows too high, it becomes unsustainable, investors will lose trust in the currency, will dump it all and the currency becomes valueless.
    It only in this sense that abusing the money creating power by having too much money in circulation affects the debt issuance in form ot Treasury Bills: By continuously monetizing its debt eventually the International money markets lose trust in such currency and will dump their T-securities in that currency in favour of a more stable currency whose Central Bank controls its money supply, thus demolishing the currency that has too much money in circulation.

    ——————————————————————

    "Do you like paying a tax on your income?"

    ——————————————————————–
    Answer:
    No, I don't like it, but unfortunately there is no other viable real realistic solution. The only viable income the government gets is through taxation. Replacing taxes with wantonly creating of money out on thin air is just a ludicrous pipe dream. Just like communism, it looks good on paper but the reality is that it could never be implemented without very nefarious dangerous consequences of total currency devaluation and resulting hyperinflation. So if you like paved roads, running water, electricty, garbage removal and sewage, while maintaining the value of your money you'd better pay your taxes to the government. As our Saviour once said in public 2000 years ago: Pay to Ceaser what is due to Ceaser and to God what is due to God.

  • josephmateus

    TO : > ps56penn62pr64
    March 25, 2011
    at 11:07 pm, anwering your last two questions:

    “Do you like having an unpayable national debt?”

    ——————————————————————-

    Answer:
    No I don’t like that at all, this terrible situation is ruining our children and grandchildren’s future. Unfortunately this unpayable national debt is the end result of many years of our idiotic irresponsible ruling politicians starting with Ronald Reagan, spending a lot more money that what comes in revenue, like drunken sailors, while at the same time cutting taxes, such as in the Reagan and George W. Bush regimes, and lately with this darn Obama administration. Heck this guy is the worse of them all: Mr. Obama has already increased the national debt by $4 trillion in the 27 months since he has been in power and lately made a dubious agreement with the opposition to further cut taxes and keep spending even more. Now not satisfied with two wars going he got involved in a totally needless third one by bombing Libya….Do you realize how much each one of those bombs cost, as a well a the running of all the other war machinery?

    But the solution to our national debt is not just to monetize the debt by paying it with creating money out of nothing….that only makes matters a lot worse, with the gutting of the currency and hyperinflation. Rather, the solution is not any magic make believe dream world rosy Pollyanna easy fix like your guru Rodger Malcolm Mitchell keeps on harping here… the truth of the matter is that there is simply no easy way out….In fact the only solution is for governments to start living within their means and not go deep in debt in the first place. Yes, austerity measures and drastically reduced government spending coupled with reducing unemployment by creating new jobs to boost tax revenue with tecnology inovation, education and become more international competitive in exports an domestic production is the only viable realistic durable solution even for monetary sovereign nations, not endless money creation.

    ——————————————————————-

    “Do you like borrowing a great deal of money from nations like the People’s Republic of China that exercise their sovereign authority and issue their own money?”

    ——————————————————————-

    Answer:
    Please don’t be ridiculous…you are saying here that the USA does not exercise its sovereign authority and does not issue its own money and instead borrows it from China. This is just totally preposterous. You are totally mistaken here: The US has been exercising its monetary sovereign authority by all along delegating authority and power to the Federal Reserve to issue and create money.

    Again, you are mistaking the money supply with the national debt, you are mistaking apples for oranges. The truth of the matter is that the despite the fact that it also creates and issue its own money, the USA has to borrow money from China in order to keep its currency credibility in the international money markets, where the US dollar competes with other major currencies.

    If the USA would just keep on creating money wantonly out of thin air monetizing its huge yearly dificits without backing it up by selling its accumulated debts in the money market, pretty soon the international investors would lose faith in the US dollar, would dump all their US Treasury securities, refuse to buy any more of the US debt and the US dollar would simply collapse.

    Do you want to be in the bread queue behind Rodger Malcolm Mitchell with your pockets full of valueless fiat dolars to pay $5.000 dollars for a loaf of bread? That is exactly what is going to happen if the US Fed “helicopter” Ben Bernanke doesn’t stop abusing his money creating and printing power, and to add insult to injury, keeping the interest rates at a ridiculous 0, with rampant inflation all around him. That is exactly what is going to happen if president Obama keeps on spending a lot more money that what his government brings in revenue, like a drunken sailor, with a total contempt and disregard for the welfare of the nation.

    Unfortunately, just like you and your infamous guru Rodger Malcolm Mitchell, president Barack Obama and Ben Bernanke also insist on keeping their heads buried in the mud and refuse to face and deal with reality. Their motto is: just keep kicking the can forward until we are out of here, and let somebody else deal with it later.

  • http://rodgermmitchell.wordpress.com Rodger Malcolm Mitchell

    Fact: The U.S. Federal government is <a href="http://rodgermmitchell.wordpress.com/2010/08/13/monetarily-sovereign-the-key-to-understanding-economics/ Monetarily Sovereign.
    Fact: The PIIGS are not Monetarily Sovereign.

    Until you understand the difference, you will not understand why taxes do not support the U.S., but taxes do support the euro nations.

    All the vitriol in the world, will not change those two facts.

    By the way, I am not alone. There is an entire school of economics called “MMT” that understands this,

    Rodger Malcolm Mitchell

  • http://rodgermmitchell.wordpress.com Rodger Malcolm Mitchell

    Talking about economics without understanding Monetary Sovereignty is like talking about mathematics without understanding arithmetic.

    Has anyone noticed that the people who understand least about any subject are the people who spend the most time hurling insults? The insults are intended to cover for ignorance.

    Rodger Malcolm Mitchell

blog comments powered by Disqus