Is Inflation Driving More People to Food Stamps?

For Americans struggling to pay for ends meat, paying for said meat just got tougher.

On Thursday, the Bureau of Labor Statistics reported its numbers that track inflation. Back out the cost of food and energy, which most economist do, and inflation looks rather tame. But if you just look at the price of food, inflation looks like a growing problem. The price of food rose 0.6% in February, and that was on top of a 0.5% increase in January. Again, these are low numbers, but the rate of growth in prices is what could be alarming. Food prices rose just 0.1% in August 2010. So prices have really picked up in just six months.

And rising food prices comes at a time when the number of people already getting food stamps has risen dramatically. From October 2007, which was just before the financial crisis, to December 2010, which is the most recently available statistics, the number of people on food stamps rose 62% to 44.1 million. That equals 13.1% of the population, up from 9% a little over three years ago. Despite the need, a number of Republicans have targeted food stamps as a problem that needs to be cut to reduce the deficit.

Of course, just because food prices are rising doesn’t mean more people will go on food stamps. The food stamps program is based on income. A family of four with a gross monthly income of $2,389 qualifies for food stamps. So just because you pay more for food doesn’t mean you can start to qualify for food stamps. But inflation does come into the equation. Here’s why:

So why are there so many more people on food stamps then there were three years ago? The obvious answer is the dramatic rise in the unemployment during the recession.There are nearly 14 million people counted as unemployed, up from a little over 7 million back in October 2007. (Of course there are a lot of people who are unemployed but not counted as unemployed, but that’s another story.) As a percentage of the population, that 5.7% who are unemployed, up from 3.1% who were unemployed a little over three years ago. But the percentage of the population who are on food stamps rose a little over 4.1%.

So where do those extra 1.5% of the population come from. Turns out it’s not just the number of people on food stamps that has risen, but the number people on food stamps who have an income is way up as well:

The number of working Americans turning to free government food stamps has surged as their hours and wages erode…

While the increase in take-up is often attributed to the sharp rise in unemployment – which on Friday hit 9.7 per cent – the Financial Times has learnt that some 40 per cent of the families now on food stamps have “earned income”, up from 25 per cent two years ago.

So why is that? Inflation, mixed with wage stagnation. When you factor in inflation, the average wage of the American consumer is basically flat. Here’s a chart (h/t Economic Policy Institute):

At the same time, the price of food and nearly everything else besides electronics, and just recently housing, has been rising. For the past few years, those increases have been small. But with prices starting to pick up, food inflation could start to be a real problem.

Related Topics: Economy & Policy
  • Latest on Business

    Brendan McDermid / Reuters

    Facebook’s Stock Falls Below $30 for First Time

    (NEW YORK) — Facebook’s stock has fallen below $30 for the first time since its much-awaited public debut this month.

    The Jury Is Out on the EuroSlate

    U.S. consumer prices rose faster than expected in May. (Mario Anzuoni / Reuters)

    Consumer Confidence in the Economy Plunged in May

    NEW YORK — American confidence in the economy suffered the biggest drop in eight months as worries about the weak jobs, housing and stock markets rattled them again. The decline comes after a few months of optimism amid some positive economic news.

  • http://rodgermmitchell.wordpress.com Rodger Malcolm Mitchell

    I guess this means the Tea Party (formerly known as the Republican Party) now will want to cut food stamps, as another deficit reduction effort.

    Rodger Malcolm Mitchell

  • http://angrymobvoter.wordpress.com angrymobvoter

    I am tired of walking into a supermarket and always seeing the person in front of me in the checkout line using “assistance” to pay for food. Am I the only one not getting money from the government? I am tired of my taxes being used to make it so easy for people to not earn a living.

    I am tired of paying taxes to pay for the person in the checkout line in front of me using food stamps to buy food only to follow that up with using a large amount of cash to by cigarettes. I am tired of paying taxes so government workers can get salaries and benefits far beyond with I get in the private sector. I am tired of paying taxes to support people who have little incentive to work and achieve. Our government is dysfunctional, inefficient, and to big. It is our huge, dysfunctional, and wasteful government that is holding back our economy and job growth.

    Our representatives vote on legislation they do not understand or have not read. They add unrelated PORK to bills that are mainly concerned with issues where it would be political suicide to vote against. Why not have every elected official sign-off that they have read and UNDERSTOOD an issue before they are permitted to vote? Those sign-offs could be scanned into the public record and put on a public website.

    Our representatives have a sense of entitlement that must be eliminated. If a law applies to the American People, it should apply to our elected officials and that includes things like social security, pension, and healthcare. Our government is wasteful and dysfunctional.

    Obama, Pelosi, Reid, and the rest of the Democrats believe in big government and intrusive regulation. They believe in taking from the people who work hard and get educated to achieve and give it to the people who do not try to better themselves.

    We must continue to VOTE THEM OUT!!!

  • http://stephenpoo.wordpress.com stephenpoo

    It would be nice for people on Social Security if the Govt. wouldn’t throw out those inflation factors, but I guess that’s not going to happen.
    Robert Reich writes with all the job losses and new entrants to the workforce hiring would have to match the boom times of the later 1990′s and even then it would be 2016 before unemployment falls to 6%..
    Were living the dream

  • http://gum0nshoe.wordpress.com gumOnShoe
  • http://rodgermmitchell.wordpress.com Rodger Malcolm Mitchell

    Would you feel better knowing your tax money is not being used to support poor people? That’s case. There is no relationship between federal taxes and federal spending.

    Unlike the situation with states, counties and cities, the federal government is Monetarily Sovereign, meaning even if federal taxes were zero, that would not reduce the federal government’s ability to spend by one cent.

    So, fear not. Your tax money does not pay for food stamps, Social Security, Medicare, the military, education, R&D, roads & bridges, Congress, the Supreme Court, the White House, or any other federal initiative.

    In fact, your federal tax money doesn’t pay for a damn thing. How does that make you feel?

    Rodger Malcolm Mitchell

blog comments powered by Disqus