Will $100 Oil Kill the Recovery?

Oil climb has traders and others saying oh-no (Photo: Reuters/Brendan McDermid)

Here’s something you never hear: Oil caused the financial crisis. Back when the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission started a year and a half ago, they had 22 things they were looking into. Oil didn’t even make the list. And why not? On the surface it’s just as reasonable as the rest. Oil prices shot up during 2007 and 2008. Higher gas prices made it harder for Americans to pay their bills, most importantly their mortgages. Loans went bad. Foreclosures shot up. House prices tumbled. The rest is history.

And yet. That’s not how anyone remembers it. Oil isn’t really even in the conversation.

If you don’t know why I am bringing this up now, you haven’t been watching the news. The unrest in the Middle East, which has spread to oil-rich Libya, has caused crude prices to spike. On Wednesday, oil hit $100 a barrel for the first time since the financial crisis. It ended the day at around $98. Still, the $100 mark is a psychological one. And the fact that oil has marched back to that level so fast while so many people are still out of work, has some concerned. But oil is rarely a recovery killer, and probably won’t be this time either. Here’s why:

Every recovery, has oil worry. The issue it seems is that when gas prices rise that leaves people with less money to pay for other things. They consume less. And the economy suffers. And that happens, but the question is how much. I remember when oil hit $50 a barrel in 2005 market forecasters began worrying that rising gas prices would kill the mid-2000s recovery. But it didn’t, we headed straight into the housing bubble. Hurray.

What many analysts miss is that while it seems like we are always filling up the tank, gas really only makes up a small part of our budget. Americans spent just 4% of their paychecks on gas in 2009, which is the latest figures I could find quickly. That means oil has to really jump before it slows spending on all the other stuff. What’s more, even when gas prices rise there are ways we can deal with it. We can drive less. We can take public transportation. We can buy smaller cars. We can start using that smaller car we bought back in 2008 again. Not all of those things are possible for everyone, but the point is there are ways to mitigate the rising cost of gas on the budget.

But there is the psychological factor. Some are saying that if gas prices get to $4 a gallon, consumer confidence will plunge. And that might have been true a decade ago. But we have lived with higher gas prices for a time. Paying $100 to fill up your tank is painful, but it’s not as freakout inducing as it once was. People adjust their expectations. So I don’t think $4 a gallon gas means people won’t travel this summer, or even less.

What’s more, higher oil prices have some positive effects on the economy, and already are. One of the other recovery killers that people have been worried about is rising interest rates. But the recent increase in oil has caused bonds to trade up, and interest rates to fall. Yes, that’s because some investors are worried about the economy, but a dip in interest rates is welcomed news nonetheless. The dollar fell as well, and a weaker dollar should continue to boost our already rising exports.

Yes, the oil price rise is only one of a number of commodities that are jumping in price. And all that will hurt profits for manufacturing companies. But the US economy relies less on manufacturing that it used to, even with rising exports. And with corporate profits rising rapidly, companies can afford to spend a little more on raw goods, before they have to raise prices. What’s more, the biggest cost for corporate America is labor, and wages aren’t expected to rise significantly anytime soon.

That’s not to say that there isn’t a price of oil at which the economy would suffer. But we are not there yet:

Some economists say the rise in oil prices has been relatively gradual, easing their effect on growth. In a Wall Street Journal survey published last week, some economists said prices on average would need to jump to about $127 a barrel to bring down growth.

“There’s been a gradual change to move toward $100, and that’s very, very important for adjustments in consumer behavior,” said Amrita Sen, an analyst in London with Barclays Capital, a unit of Barclays PLC. “Because there’s been such a gradual change in prices, people have adjusted to it.”

There is a balancing mechanism in every recovery. Things pop up, like interest rates, and everyone starts saying the recovery is over. Then something else pops up, like oil, to neutralize the first thing, and everyone starts worrying about that. In truth, recoveries are very hard to stop. They have amazing momentum, even if slower than we would like.

Related Topics: Economy & Policy
  • Latest on Business

    Brendan McDermid / Reuters

    Facebook’s Stock Falls Below $30 for First Time

    (NEW YORK) — Facebook’s stock has fallen below $30 for the first time since its much-awaited public debut this month.

    The Jury Is Out on the EuroSlate

    U.S. consumer prices rose faster than expected in May. (Mario Anzuoni / Reuters)

    Consumer Confidence in the Economy Plunged in May

    NEW YORK — American confidence in the economy suffered the biggest drop in eight months as worries about the weak jobs, housing and stock markets rattled them again. The decline comes after a few months of optimism amid some positive economic news.

  • http://cleitophon.wordpress.com cleitophon

    “Americans spent just 4% of their paychecks on gas in 2009″

    I think you are forgetting that oil is a component of just about every product that can be bought. Take food: machines, herbicides, pesticides, fertilizer, harvesting, processing, packaging and distribution. Then there are its uses in medicine, plastics, asphalt and concrete, not to speak of the bunker fuel used to sail all the schlock from China and to the west. I think you will find that Maersk have been slow steaming for a while to cut costs. Airlines are going bust ect ect.

    If it were merely a question of paying for the commute…..sigh

  • wmhumphrey

    Likewise, that’s exactly what I was going to comment. I absolutely agree, mirror your post!

  • wmhumphrey

    “But the US economy relies less on manufacturing that it used to, even with rising exports….”

    Commercial transportation consumption is the driving economic factor, not personal consumption.

    For example, “according to the Air Transport Association, an airline trade group, every cent-per-gallon-per-year increase in the price of jet fuel means USD$170 million to USD$180 million in additional fuel expenses for the industry (Soaring Oil Prices Hit US Airlines, 2011, February 22).”

    Soaring Oil Prices Hit US Airlines (2011, February 22). Airwise. Retrieved from http://news.airwise.com/story/view/1298416429.html

  • Rick Russell

    This is a very… unevenly edited blog post. I’m not going to give a detailed list of the multiple errors here, but I can only suggest that you proofread and correct it.

    OK, well, a couple of highlights.

    * it seems, it seems, it seems

    * if gas prices get to $4 a barrel

    And… others.

  • Daniel Daugherty

    Heyeverybody! Did you hear this guy? He said to relax, everything will be just fine.

    Gandel, have you thought about all the people unemployed for more than six months? All the people working part-time against their wills? All the students with gigantic debts and shitty jobs? I’m sure $4/gallon gasoline will be just fine for them.

    Just more propaganda from the mill to make Americans continue their “patriotic duty”: Buying shit they don’t need because they feel “confident.”

  • http://rodgermmitchell.wordpress.com Rodger Malcolm Mitchell

    There is a close historical relationship between oil prices and inflation. If this relationship continues to hold, here is what will happen: Inflation will rear its ugly head.

    The economists, media and politicians wrongly will blame the federal deficit (which historically has had no relationship with inflation), and work even harder to cut federal spending. This cut will end the recovery.

    So, in effect, rising oil prices will end the recovery, though in fact, there is no direct relationship between the two.

    Rodger Malcolm Mitchell

  • laudens

    It’s irrational for me to pay $100 a month more for apartment rent now because rents might go up next summer, but rational for me to pay fifty cents a gallon more for gas today because crude prices might go up next month.

    Your nuts!

    That’s not a reason for gas prices to go up, it’s an excuse to justify charging a lot more than honest profits can justify.

  • samgilbert

    “Your nuts!”

    What about his nuts?

  • economicsfordemocrats

    Sorry people oil is gone as a fuel at best it will last to the end of the century. It is to valuable to burn! As mentioned, it is needed for other products.
    I know the oil market is not a pure competitive arena with the cartels and all the speculating financial products.
    But, higher pricing does motivate alternatives and lowers consumption which also helps the environment.
    Higher prices will cause hardships, especially in the lower income families who have to drive.
    So what are some of the alternatives.
    1. Reduce gas taxes as prices go substantially up.
    2. Provide a lot more investment capital in alternatives.(monetary)
    3. Provide some small subsidies for truckers and lower income families.
    4. Encourage some of the vast oil monies to invest more in alternatives.

    Remember, Braziel which is finally doing economically better does not use oil in fueling their autos. I believe there are other countries that do not use gas either.

    We have all the solutions we just can not implement them. The monetary system is one of the major reasons we can not.

    Mark Pash, CFP
    Center for Progressive Economics

  • 94134gamesmith

    Gamesmith94134: will-100-oil-kill-the-recovery?

    I agreed with cleitophon ‘s statement, “If it were merely a question of paying for the commute…..sigh.”, and I worry of chain reaction on the inflation that would fall on our citizens. But, I would agree with Amrita Sen, an analyst in London with Barclays Capital, a unit of Barclays PLC. “Because there’s been such a gradual change in prices, people have adjusted to it.” Then, it is real for Stephen Gandel that” In truth, recoveries are very hard to stop. They have amazing momentum, even if slower than we would like.” Why? It is my belief that we American must face the question whether to give up the car or go commute; and it is luxury if only you cannot afford it. It has been the dilemma for America to start mass transportation over twenty years; since we buy our kids a car to go college, it was necessary and affordable. However, the environment changed; it is not the T-model roaring on the dusty road anymore. It is the gridlock on every Highway, and more of those parking and violation tickets, and insurance paid; then you can afford another car. I am not the “Save the air” type person to stop GM making more car; I just a business man working in the oil and finance industry that my profit is cut by value of the dollar through inflation and depreciation; and I found our oil industry to green industry may not working fast enough for us the American. In term of recession and unemployment, I would like to know if we understand how we must change ourselves to meet the new world. Our economy is running on service industry and less manufacturing industry; then oil is mostly personal consumption, and can we afford to continue or switch now.
    • Do Americans know the oil field in Middle East going run dry in the next twenty five year?
    • Or do they understand how much our government subsidizes the auto industry, tourist industry to promote consumerism?
    • Or, should we go another war to maintain or stabilize the price of gas is still affordable or face and adopt mass transportation in the near future?
    I do not think inflation would be fair for those salary earners could not get a raise since we are still recovering our economy; however, I would urge the Fed to stand up and raise the interest rate now. It helps to cut the imbalance from the developed and emerging markets; and ease the tension on the currency war then we can take off the tourniquet on the cash flow on creditor and debtors. Forget the debate of the debts and GDP ratio, or the comfort zone or the better looks in the budget. If we cannot change ourselves now, we must suffer for the consequence. $127 would reverse the recovery in America; but……., who can stop the wind? If Saudi making 500,000 barrel a day cannot compensate the loss in oil field destroyed by Kaddafi now, then the price of going up is inevitable. As anemic in finance, and unemployment to American remains; then, inflation would jump of the cliff.
    Who can we blame if we are the ones are refused to change and adapt? It is not the 100 dollars oil kill the recovery, it is we unrecovered. So, don’t blame anyone else but yourself.
    Mr. Bernanke, just start our engine now; or you will step in Mr. Paul Volcker’s shoe. And, Mr. Obama is just another Jimmy Carter. 2012 is not far, and there is more houses to be built and not in America.
    May the Buddha bless you?

  • http://theramblingsofateenagegirl.wordpress.com azhou10

    This is why we need to move on to renewable energy, perfect reason why.

  • josephmateus

    Mr. STEPHEN GANDEL, again you are dreaming in technicolor in your super rosy Pollyanna world, with your head deeply buried in the ground, like an ostrich. You wrote at the end of your inglorious ridiculous most preposterous devious article : – quote >

    “In truth, recoveries are very hard to stop. They have amazing momentum, even if slower than we would like”.

    < unquote – .

    Now once again, you are wrongly assuming that we are in a sustained recovery when all realistic truly knowledgeable economists say exactly the contrary: Unemployment remains at above 9% and if you include people who are under-employed who gave up looking for work and who took jobs earning half of what they used to earn in their previous jobs, in reality unemployment jumps to over 16%. Housing and commercial real estate are continuing to decline in value, foreclosures are rising constantly and all sober real indicators tells us that the housing and commercial market is going to continue in a downward spiral in the foresseable future. People are losing big equity in their properties by the day.

    And the only reason the stock market is going up is not because of any positive economic fundamentals but because of all this Fed's "helicopter" Ben Bernanke's continued money printing like crazy and maintaining interest rates a totally ridiculous 0%. All this fiat funny money is being showered on to Wall Street from Bernanke's helicopter, where investors and speculators are feasting on it, buying and buying and buying shares in the natural resources commodities thus bidding up their price like crazy.

    As the US dollar continues to devaluate because of the brutal unprecedented double increase of the money supply in the last two years the price of commodities are all also shooting up further because they are all priced in US dollars. Oil is the most obvious one. $ 127 dollars a barrel? You've got to be kidding. The conditions are such now that oil could very easily surpass $150 dollars a barrel before you know it. So if $ 127 oil is the the price at which it will bring down growth, what do you think is going to happen with $150 even $170 dollars a barrel for oil? Most devastating, to say the least. Don't believe me ? Just look what happened in the recent past, when the price of oil shot up from $60 dollars barrel at the end of 2006 to $147 dollars a barrel by August 2008, and even then the Wall Street Stock Market speculation was not as high as it is right now, because the money supply had not yet doubled.

    So you are assuming that just because we are presently experiencing a most abnormal bubble in the stock market that we are in a recovery. What a fool your are, Mr. Gandel, I tell you what, you better sell all your shares in Wall Street and run for cover, because the collapse is coming and is coming big time with a louder bang than ever. All we need is for interest rates to start rising and all of a sudden Wall Street speculators will no longer have free funny money to play with, and will start selling like crazy….why, the speculation out of thing air is now even worse that it was before the big crash of 1929 and before the crash of 2008….

    But unfortunately people like you insist on keeping their thick heads buried in the ground and just refuse to face reality….and when the catastrophe strikes it will be suddenly, devastating, horribly, terribly mercilessly and all those who think that we are in a true economic recovery will be hurting big big big time, walking down the road broke and pennyless, with just a few fiat worthless Ben Bernanke dollars in their pockets.

  • josephmateus

    Mr. Mark Pash, you call yourself a big time CFP
    (Center for Progressive Economics) economist but yet you don’t even know how to spell the name of the that country. Mr. Pash, the name is BRAZIL (english) BRASIL (portuguese), not “Braziel” like you wrote above here.

  • dochosvet

    Well, darn. I was going to retire this summer. Damed if you do and D’d if you don’t as I must drive to work.
    A public transit. Get real. There is not enough buses or trains even if we had some slowly quick change of attitude. The system would be overwhelmed now with the population we have around every metropolitan area. You also don’t build a buss or train without a lot of petroleum. The other half of the population still lives in the country and needs to drive or, or,? Well, there is no other way when you are in E. Montana, the Dakotas, Texas etc. We are doomed and so is my retirement because I was going to drive! But you can never “afford” to get married or have a baby so I guess I will retire. At least I can stay home and not drive.
    These cultural changes like public transit take, 30-40 or more years before they really can change things. We are locked into what we are for the rest of my life.

  • 94134gamesmith

    Gamesmith94134: Gamesmith94134: will-100-oil-kill-the-recovery?

    Hi. Mr. Dochosvet, relax. Why are you so negative? It is not profitable, right. And, it does not even have a chauffeur; since it is public transit. Public transit is only for the next generation, and it is only twenty five years away.
    Do you know a line from point A to point B is made out tinny dotes that connects? Then, you must go to point A, then, it brings you from point A to point B. However, I see more dotes connected in the metro area that high rises with dense population; it provides the density in forming the line. In addition, if the gas goes four dollar a gallon, I see more dotes to connect; and eight dollars a gallon made a perfect line even reaches where you lives or where you camp with your car. And, I am optimistic that you may have time to fill up for gas.
    Chinese-American contributed the transcontinental Railway; May be, they can do it again with the up-grade version with the bullet train; .then, we, American can go fishing.

  • waynebernard

    If you take the time to read carefully through ExxonMobil’s latest annual summary, you’ll find that the world’s largest publicly traded oil company is having increasing difficulty replacing its produced reserves using the drill bit. Here is an article showing how, despite spending billions of dollars on exploration, ExxonMobil has only been able to replace 95 out of every 100 barrels produced over the past 10 years, staying ahead of the game only through acquisitions:

    http://viableopposition.blogspot.com/2011/02/if-exxon-cant-find-oil-who-can.html

    That is at least partly why oil prices are high. Welcome to our new reality.

  • http://gum0nshoe.wordpress.com gumOnShoe

    In 2005 $50 a barrel might not have been enough to do us in, but in 2011 (6 years later) we’ve seen a 50% increase. Paychecks have shrunk, inflation has been moderate, but not enough to offset a 50% increase in the peak price of oil.

    Oil really was part of the cause of the first recession, and it’ll be the tipping point of the second recession. Luckily most people are on steadier ground, but that doesn’t mean everyone can cope with gas prices this high for long periods of time.

    BTW, great tool: http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=gas+prices

    Look at where gas prices peak. $2.50 -> $4.00 is a 62% increase. So, 2009 -> 2011. 4% of the budget becomes ~6.48% of the budget. But, now you have to reduce wages. Couldn’t find exact numbers from wolfram, but you can imagine its not good. We might actually be at about 7%-8% of a budget overall. When you get into actual expendable cash (after expected payments, mortgages etc), this is actually eating up a lot more money than a % of income is likely to lead you to believe.

    And as you said, for morale, this hits people hard.

    Anytime you want to go anywhere you have to ask, is this worth it? Restaurants lose yet more income. Staycations, stick around.

    When you buy a home, you have to ask, is it close enough to my job? Most people live in areas that new home space is a significant distance from city centers, and even some business centers. So, this means a prolonged lack of new homes.

    The only good thing to this whole situation is a renewed push towards renewable energy. But this means large adjustments that our society has to make. Our society isn’t that flexible. Its not set up for this.

    Either we get with the new program and become less suburban or we’re in for a lot of pain…

  • waltwriston

    Banks and their lackey hedge funds are pushing prices up! Their may be and upside, but I doubt it, Remember the petrodollar recycling of the 70′s? The banks excess capital reserves from petrodollars went to Latin America. This time banks are simply using it to pump up their profit margins! See: The Goldman Roll on index oil funds, every institution is rolling a synchronized fashion;Roll forward. Never dare to roll back because oil is on average 67% of the time backward!

    Implement a Tobin Tax and fundamentals will fall back in place both on futures and currency!

    Remember how the financial economy could never exceed the real economy is was supposed to be based upon? Well it fictitious valuations put it at roughly 5X’s that of the real economy!

  • waltwriston

    Tue by market capitalization, but OXY after buying Citigroups trading platform outs it at the top of the stock exchange in per share value, The UK (Shell, BP etc..) has always had this advantage!

    Which BTW was sold on pennies to its net annual revenue generating powers.

  • waltwriston
blog comments powered by Disqus