Why Google Still Needs “Adult Supervision”

In explaining his decision to pass the boss torch back to co-founder Larry Page, Google CEO Eric Schmidt tweeted that, ha-ha, “adult supervision” is no longer needed at the company that dominates internet search and advertising. And Google’s monster fourth-quarter earnings offer evidence that Schmidt is true to his tweet: profits reached $2.5 billion on sales of $8.4 billion. But maybe he shouldn’t have been so flip.  Maybe Google needs a lot more adult supervision rather than less, because its too-cool-for-the-Fortune 500 culture is becoming too cumbersome, a geek commune that’s simply gotten too big to manage like a startup.

The act-small ethos is always a source of tension in tech companies that grow quickly and successfully.  Google leaves people free to pursue their own projects‹engineers still can devote 20% of their time to doing their own thing. That’s entrepreneurial, but in a company that now has tens of thousands of employees it makes for a lot of unfocused work. And the engineers who think they’re working on the coolest thing ever created can’t get the attention of top management.  Result: the right hand doesn’t always know what the left was doing, meaning lots of knowledge gets sidetracked or lost in the Googleplex. And decisionmaking gets strung out by the need for consensus, which is easy in a small company but harder for a big one. Visitors to the Googleplex report internal management strategies that are by turns utopian and bizarre — everybody evaluates everybody else’s performance, for instance using, a wiki-style management software.

It’s possible that Google doesn’t need a guy who can invent the whip — it needs a guy who can crack the whip.  Of late Google’s got so much brainpower just churning and churning, with not much to show for it. Its Android mobile operating system is a hit, but there are so many more expensive train wrecks like Google Buzz, which underlines Google’s swing and miss in the social network space, and the disappointing Chrome operating system, which seems to have lost its place in the company’s hierarchy. Even Schmidt seemed confused by its status, referring to Chrome recently as a netbook OS, which is the kiss of death since netbooks are so yesterday. Tablets are where it’s at, and the people running Chrome certainly view it as tablet OS. Schmidt was either out to lunch or out of touch.

Schmidt is Mr. Outside, Google’s guy on Wall Street and at the White House, and also the guy who ran the management and board meetings while Page and co-founder Sergey Brin concentrated on the products, on nourishing Google’s culture and trying to do no evil. Page, who created the algorithm that made Google search possible, also pursues other interests, such as energy projects. He’s behind Google’s push to create a driverless electric powered automobile. Very cool, but not necessarily what you want your CEO to be doing, even in his designated spare time.

That’s what makes the choice of Page as CEO so interesting; he seems to be everything Google doesn’t need right now.

More on Time.com:

See photos on life in the Googleplex

See photos on the story behind Google doodles

Related Topics: Eric Schmidt, Google, Google CEO, Larry Page, Technology & Media
  • Latest on Business

    Brendan McDermid / Reuters

    Facebook’s Stock Falls Below $30 for First Time

    (NEW YORK) — Facebook’s stock has fallen below $30 for the first time since its much-awaited public debut this month.

    The Jury Is Out on the EuroSlate

    U.S. consumer prices rose faster than expected in May. (Mario Anzuoni / Reuters)

    Consumer Confidence in the Economy Plunged in May

    NEW YORK — American confidence in the economy suffered the biggest drop in eight months as worries about the weak jobs, housing and stock markets rattled them again. The decline comes after a few months of optimism amid some positive economic news.

  • airalcorn2

    This article doesn’t make any sense. You mention “Google’s monster fourth-quarter earnings” and then go on to criticize every single aspect of their business management. Shouldn’t you have been praising their innovative spirit (Google Buzz, driver-less electronic cars, etc.) rather than fallaciously attempting to discredit it?

  • http://gum0nshoe.wordpress.com gumOnShoe

    If I worked at Google, and I don’t, I’d tell you to kindly put your pen someplace you wouldn’t want to put it if you get my drift.

    Clearly what they are doing is working. And just because your *model* says they aren’t maximizing profits doesn’t mean they aren’t maximizing their current goals.

    You just don’t understand what the company is and what it stands for. Which means, you likely shouldn’t be writing about it.

  • http://gum0nshoe.wordpress.com gumOnShoe

    And to further push the point. Consider this. A company’s goal should be to provide an interesting product, provide for its employees, and grow enough to have options to survive.

    No where in that does it mean a company has to be a vampire squid to achieve success.

    Once a company is stable and can remain stable it should be free to do whatever its workforce wants it too.

    Its nice that there’s at least one company out there capable of doing this.

    I wish the rest of them would take a leaf out of this and think about “sustainable” business plans, to take a word from the restaurant culture.

  • http://sharmaaman.wordpress.com sharmaaman

    The article is pretty shallow, leaving uncovered several aspects of the leadership change. The article hints at the manpower issue (attrition), failure of social media initiatives and complicated operations. But there are more serious problems that need to be tackled, viz

    1. Define vision for the company
    2. Reduce over dependence on the revenue stream from search advertising
    3. Move away from triumvirate decision making to ensure speed and nimbleness
    4. Ensure more risk taking.

    Most importantly, Google wants its CEO to be what Steve Jobs is to Apple, somebody who can visualize and bring to life first of its kind products that make competition irrelevant.

    Here is a link that compares leadership traits of Eric Schmidt and Larry Page. This simple comparison indicates where Google is headed. Please have a look! http://goo.gl/LIc0L

    Aman Sharma
    Twitter id : @amancool5

blog comments powered by Disqus