Are government jobs becoming dead end jobs?

There used to be no safer career path that landing a government post. Sure, you might be able to pull in a bigger salary in the private sector, but it was hard to beat the benefits, or the job security. Public sector labor unions are often politically influential and fiercely protective of the perquisites of the civil servant. In times of economic stress, when employees in private firms faced pink slips, government paychecks often kept coming, taken from the tax revenues raised from those under greater risk of unemployment.

However, those halcyon days for the government worker may be coming to an end. Around the world, public sector employees are beginning to feel the bite from austerity measures aimed at reducing government debt and deficits, putting their pay, benefits and jobs at risk. The trend could have major consequences not just for the welfare of millions of civil servants, but the performance of the economies of the West.

The evidence is everywhere. Andrew Cuomo, the new governor of the state of New York, is starting his first term in office with a plan to freeze the salaries of government workers. Portugal, Spain and Greece have all slashed public sector wages. The U.K. is looking at possibly hundreds of thousands of government job losses in coming years due to Prime Minister David Cameron’s aggressive budget cuts. Even the labor rights of state employees are at risk. Several U.S. states are looking into legislation to limit the power of unions, especially those in the public sector. As policymakers in the West face the gargantuan task of closing giant budget deficits, there is every reason to believe we’re just at the beginning of the retrenchment of the public sector workforce and the taxpayer money allocated to it.

The result will likely be heightened political conflict throughout the Western democracies. As elected politicians strive to fix broken budgets, unions will fight ferociously to defend the jobs and benefits of public sector workers. This is just part of the wider battle the West is facing over how to allocate shrinking government resources in an era of austerity. We’ve already seen public sector strikes and protests in Greece, Spain and France over reforms in pay and pensions. Or take a look at the vicious battle between Chris Christie, the budget-cutting governor of the state of New Jersey, and the head of the powerful teachers’ union. Christie once called the union chief a “greedy thug.”

Yet it is inevitable that the government worker will have to pay the price for yawning budget deficits and rising national debts. If taxpayers are facing bigger tax bills and reduced government services, it’s only fair that the government employee share in the pain as well. It’s hard to argue with the logic expressed by new Wisconsin governor Scott Walker: “We can no longer live in a society where the public employees are the haves and the taxpayers footing the bills are the have-nots.”

Yet there will be wider consequences for the overall economies of the West. Public sector workers are facing job losses while unemployment is still agonizingly high in many parts of the West, which could strain the job market even further. That already seems to be happening in the U.K. and the U.S. And public sector job and pay cuts mean lower spending power among the middle class, a factor that will drag on economic growth. Even though a decline in welfare and security for the public sector worker may be inevitable – and perhaps even a bit emotionally satisfying for some – it’s yet another hurdle in the way of a true recovery from the Great Recession, and one that could have economic fallout for years to come. So as government workers suffer, we’ll all suffer with them.

Related Topics: Economy & Policy, Wall Street & Markets
  • Latest on Business

    Brendan McDermid / Reuters

    Facebook’s Stock Falls Below $30 for First Time

    (NEW YORK) — Facebook’s stock has fallen below $30 for the first time since its much-awaited public debut this month.

    The Jury Is Out on the EuroSlate

    U.S. consumer prices rose faster than expected in May. (Mario Anzuoni / Reuters)

    Consumer Confidence in the Economy Plunged in May

    NEW YORK — American confidence in the economy suffered the biggest drop in eight months as worries about the weak jobs, housing and stock markets rattled them again. The decline comes after a few months of optimism amid some positive economic news.

  • http://jaguar6cy.wordpress.com jaguar6cy

    If two farmers live on an island and both produce food, both can eat well. If one decides to form a government to issue studies, rules and regulations, the remaining farmer has to produce twice as much for both to survive. The government worker produces nothing of economic value, and requires that his full support come from the remaining farmer. If you are a liberal or democrat you will not understand this to be a problem. Are you still a liberal? Why?

  • deconstructiva

    Michael, so where will the jobs come from? That’s NOT a rhetorical question so please try to answer it. Since Kiviat left there have been waaaay more posts telling us what we already know – lots of people are out of work – than posts trying to solve the problem. So how do we fix it? Barbara had tried to ponder solutions but your teammates aren’t stepping up. Interview some experts and creative thinkers and then post some ideas to get everyone back to work.

  • azmaveth

    A segment on NPR today pointed out that mag-lev trains haven’t caught on in Germany because the unions oppose them due to substantially lower maintenance needs. It’s long past time to give unions a good kick in the rear, if for no other reason than to punish them harshly for pushing their card-check agenda to deprive all U.S. workers of a secret ballot.

  • doctorfixit

    There’s no need to reduce the pay or the benefits of government employees. It is simply necessary to have far fewer of them. Approximately 75% to 85% of government employees could be dismissed, and no one would notice, except that traffic would be much lighter in government towns like state capitols. Fewer government job-killers means more freedom, and more job creation. Sharp reductions in bureaucracy are the best way to create jobs.

  • http://bonzer10.wordpress.com bonzer10

    What if one farmer has a huge extended family and the other no family. The large family decides he needs more room so invades the other farmers land. Do you think he would want a against that, as well as some recourse under law? Only morons think the world can operate without some measure of overriding authority and regulation. Are you still a moron? Why?

  • doneck

    Dismiss 75% to 85% of government employees? That is nonsensie. You will have to fire most policemen, firemen, teachers, and sanitation and public health workers. You sre asking for disease, ignorance and anarchy.

  • tornadoes28

    Actually the Wisconsin governors statement is NOT logical. The taxpayers are not the “have-nots”. What a stupid statement. The government workers and non-government workers are all the same. They are doing work. AND, the government workers are also feeling pain in the form of furloughs AND layoffs. There is no difference between government workers and non-government workers. Don’t listen to idiots like Glen Beck and Sarah Palin. They are ignorant fools.

  • tornadoes28

    doctorfixit, you are brain dead.

  • http://www.maureenmower.com Maureen Mower

    There is at least one error in your article. In the second to last paragraph you say, “If taxpayers are facing bigger tax bills…”. Except, we aren’t facing that. The GOP just forced us into two more years of the Bush tax cuts, and will likely do it again in 2012.

    So what is really happening here is that public employees are becoming the new scapegoats. First it was the poor who were sucking the lifeblood out of the economy – hence, welfare reform. Then it was the illegal immigrant population, hence all the calls to incarcerate and deport illegals, build fences, and isolate ourselves (nevermind that illegals can’t take “our” jobs because “our” jobs have already been sent overseas, where native workers do them for pennies with no security, benefits, or protections from abuse).

    When that wasn’t enough to fix the economy – as it could not be, since the real problem is corporate greed and financial fraud – the next target was the unemployed (the victims of the great recession, who were already paying the price for the greed and arrogance of those at the top). Suddenly the unemployed were not the sympathetic struggling victims who deserved help until the economy recovered, but “leeches” on the public teat, accused of being drug addicts, lazy, unwilling to accept jobs at lower pay rates (as if those are available), etc. So now we have unemployment benefits cut off at 99 weeks (IF you happen to live in a state that gives you even that much), and millions of people being forced to apply for welfare (negating any good that welfare reform did).

    But even that is not enough to stabilize the economy or balance our budgets (as it could not have been, because the unemployed, like the illegals and the poor, were never the real problem). So now they are targeting public employees and unions.

    There was an old saying after WWII about “first they came for ___” (fill in the blank), “and I did nothing because I wasn’t ___”. Eventually the saying goes, “then they came for me, and there was no one left to stand up for me”. That is what is happening in our government today. First they came for the poor, then the immigrants, then the unemployed, and now the unions. They’re also targeting the elderly and disabled with plans to gut Social Security and Medicare.

    How long will it be before it’s YOUR turn? Will there be anyone left to stand up for you?

  • carotexas1

    Michael are payroll freezes unusual in state governments? Is this the first time it has happened for states and federal workers?

  • http://look-at-me.info pobept

    Government is to big too intrusive, spending in excess of revenues.
    Cut government make it smaller more effective.

    Start by firing 25% of all government employees at both state and federal levels.

  • http://erieangel.wordpress.com erieangel

    Wisconsin governor Scott Walker: “We can no longer live in a society where the public employees are the haves and the taxpayers footing the bills are the have-nots.”
    .
    The problem with this quote is that Walker is implying that government workers are wealthy. Civil services has never been a road to riches. Job security, yes, wealth no. While I am not in a union nor a government worker, it really irks that these people are being blamed for the our economic woes. States, and DC are having problems paying government workers because the private sector workforce has shrunk so much–and Wall Street, we all know is at fault for that.

  • http://www.maureenmower.com Maureen Mower

    No, payroll freezes are not that unusual. They have happened before, usually DURING a recession. Having it happen almost 2 years after the recession is allegedly “over” is a bit unusual though.

    Furthermore, there has never been such a concerted attack on unions by elected officials (who have, in the past, owed much of their election successes to union members). The push toward union busting has not been this widespread for decades, and it is a very frightening prospect, as the workplace protections we have now are directly due to the organizing of unions that fought for workers’ rights.

    We can thank the Citizens United decision for this new attack on the unions, because now those politicians can count on far larger donations from corporations who have a vested interest in being able to dismantle many of the worker protections the unions fought for, but have to eliminate the unions first.

    We are headed for a time when the average American worker will be little more than an indentured servant, forced to accept whatever crumbs are thrown our way and afraid to ever speak up when we are mistreated or there are safety issues at our jobs lest we get fired (and find there are no longer any unemployment benefits or whistleblower protections to help us). We will also be working until the day we die once Social Security is dismantled (another goal of both big business and the GOP), because no one will be able to afford to retire, even at 90 years old.

  • http://www.maureenmower.com Maureen Mower

    Okay, now that you’ve done your duty to the GOP and Fox by spouting the “party line”, how about getting specific? Since you claim that government is “too intrusive”, please detail exactly how the government is intruding in YOUR life.

    As for your suggestion regarding cutting the gov’t workforce, again I would ask you to be specific. WHICH jobs? In what agencies and departments?

    How will you feel when it takes an extra 2 months to process your tax refund, or when you damage your car because you hit a pothole on the interstate at 70mph that wasn’t repaired because there aren’t enough workers to get to all of the potholes?

    Is it okay with you if your doctor refuses to see you until he/she gets paid for your last visit from Medicare because they’ve cut staff and it takes months longer to process claims? Or maybe you’ll be okay with getting e-coli or some other food-borne illness because there aren’t enough inspectors to assure the quality and safety of the food you buy?

    Would you like to have 25% more of your house burn to the ground while you wait for the fire department to show up because they’ve had to cut staff and trucks or close firehouses? How about waiting 25% longer for the EMT’s when you’re having a heart attack – can you survive that much longer? Or maybe when your house is being robbed, you’d be okay with letting the thieves get away because there aren’t enough cops to get there before the crooks are gone?

    There is no question that the government could run more efficiently, and in doing so, could save money by eliminating some redundant positions and consolidating other jobs. However, making that happen will take money, as we first have to bring all government functions into the 21st century, as well as revamping the way many things are done to eliminate redundancy and unnecessary bureaucracy. But leaving the processes untouched and just cutting staff is not going to solve anything. It will, however, create a host of problems we do NOT need.

  • http://www.maureenmower.com Maureen Mower

    Amen!! Thank you for being a voice of reason and truth. There are far too few of us.

    PS – I am not a government worker or a union member either. In fact, I’m a 99er – one of the last group of victims of corporate fraud and greed to be blamed for circumstances that were never in our control.

  • waynebernard

    “Are government jobs becoming dead end jobs?”

    Better yet, as shown here, die and the government will still pay you:

    http://viableopposition.blogspot.com/2010/11/government-waste-how-to-get-paid-after.html

  • vbierschwale

    Am I the only one that understands what really is happening here?

    Lets put it into perspective.
    1. Lower the private sector wages by sending the jobs offshore.
    2. Now lower the government sectors wages to compete with the private sector wages.

    keep repeating the process until we reach zero wages.

    http://keepamericaatwork.com/?p=12768

  • http://erieangel.wordpress.com erieangel

    Full disclosure: I work for a non-profit, in the mental health field. The agency with which I am employeed gets most of its money from the state. Nation wide, the state mental hospitals have closed (which happens to be a good thing for the most part) in favor of community treatment; which does btw, cost less. But now, the dollars for that community treatment keeps going down. Every year we are expected to serve more and more clients with less and less money. This has been going on since on the onset of the community treatment movement and will only get worse when agencies like my own become the scapegoat for the poor economy–which will happen when there is nobody left to blame.

  • Michael Schuman

    Looking at the issue globally, as this post intended, taxes are going up, in places like Spain and Portugal. The Japanese PM is considering a rise in the consumption tax. Also, in the US, some states have hiked taxes. And don’t assume that higher federal taxes aren’t coming at some point, whether Democrats or Republicans rule in Washington.

  • Michael Schuman

    The issue here is that public sector workers are facing wage freezes or cuts, or job losses on a giant scale, across the developed world. A instance of this here or there wouldn’t have a big impact; a huge wage of budget cuts that impact government workers will.

  • dochosvet

    I like Maureen. And some others. All this cutting without thinking of the results. I grant you sometimes it seems people are leaning on shovels at county work jobs but when 15 minutes of an hour you need six strong people and only brought four so no one would be seen leaning on a shovel you have to let four stand around while the foreman calls for two more people he should have brought. Now it really costs more. The cutters have no idea what it takes to get a job done as most are politicians who have more than adequate help thanks to the taxpayer.
    Without a union we are all at the bosses mercy and the company rules. If you don’t believe me read some history like the coal mine strikes and unions in 1900. Make you cry or be real proud of the union and strikers.

  • Michael Schuman

    Walker’s comments are quite just. He’s not implying that government workers are wealthy; what he means is that they can’t continue to be sacred cows feasting on taxpayer money while budgets are blown out, government services are declining and the private sector is struggling. The other option here is increasing taxes on those employed in the private sector, even as they face high unemployment and wage pressure, to keep paying government bills. Why should public sector workers be exempt from the pain of budget cuts when the rest of us suffer? I wish we wouldn’t have to make such decisions and everybody currently employed by governments could keep their jobs and salaries. But is that realistic, based on what’s going on with the state of public finances?

  • deconstructiva

    I wish we wouldn’t have to make such decisions and everybody currently employed by governments could keep their jobs and salaries. But is that realistic…
    .
    What? Michael, are you implying that some shouldn’t be working then? Hope not, but the private sector is NOT picking up the hiring slack enough. If the public sector is contracting and the private one won’t hire back the ‘99’ers, what then?

  • http://lumuhuku.wordpress.com Dev

    Atleast the accountability shall be fixed and performance will become what counts.

blog comments powered by Disqus