Europe’s debt crisis: An uglier 2011?

French President Sarkozy and other EU leaders talked fiscal crisis this week (Eric Vidal/REUTERS)

At this point in the never-ending euro crisis, it should be clear to Europe’s leaders that their piecemeal approach to the debt problems of the Eurozone’s weakest members has been a failure. Rescues for Greece and Ireland have not stopped the contagion. Moody’s recently threatened to downgrade its credit rating on Spain, and on Friday, lowered Ireland’s rating by five notches, even after that nation’s European Union/IMF bailout. Standard & Poor’s warned of a downgrade for Belgium. In a bond auction this week, Portugal’s borrowing costs nearly doubled in the just the past month. But that’s still not enough evidence to convince Europe’s leaders to change their policies.

In a summit on Thursday, European leaders agreed to form a permanent bailout framework, set to become effective in 2013. But once again, they dodged proposals for new approaches to the crisis. The continued resistance to more proactive, comprehensive solutions to Europe’s debt crisis will just make it more likely the Eurozone will continue to suffer bailout after bailout.

It’s not that Europe’s leaders haven’t been warned that this is where the Eurozone is headed. Recent days have seen an outpouring of criticism of the European Union’s haphazard policy towards the crisis. Here’s what Frank-Walter Steinmeier and Peer Steinbrück, two former German ministers, wrote recently in The Financial Times:

The time for stumbling through the euro crisis is over. Piecemeal approaches and wait-and-see attitudes are endangering European integration. We now need a more radical, targeted effort to end the current uncertainty, and provide stronger support for the future of Europe’s common institutions.

IMF Managing Director Dominique Strauss-Kahn has made repeated calls for a more comprehensive solution. This is what is said in a recent interview:

The situation in Europe is serious and economic recovery sluggish– and there is no silver bullet to fix it overnight. What the Eurozone needs is a comprehensive solution. Just as the resolution of the global financial crisis two years ago required a global approach, a European approach is now needed to resolve the problem of low growth in the Eurozone.

And this, from the chief executive of PIMCO, Mohamed El-Erian:

A liquidity approach that delays the day of reckoning may be good regional politics, but its bad economics. It does not restore sustainable growth to the periphery, and it exposes the core to contamination – be it through peripheral liabilities being transferred to the German taxpayer or the ECB’s (European Central Bank) balance sheet coping with by purchases and repos of peripheral bonds.

There has been no shortage of proposals Europe’s leaders could have examined. Italy and Luxembourg floated the idea of a Europe-wide bond. Even short-term possibilities weren’t considered, such as a Belgian idea to expand the size of the bailout fund cobbled together in May, or an ECB suggestion to use some of those funds to buy distressed sovereign bonds. There has been stiff resistance to any change in the current bailout system of dealing with the crisis – especially from Germany and other more fiscally austere northern European nations.

I can sympathize with Germany’s position. The German government doesn’t want to be responsible for the finances of its Eurozone neighbors any more that is absolutely necessary. But the shortsighted policies that have resulted are both bad politics and economics. The longer the debt crisis rolls on, the bigger the potential cost and burden on German taxpayers. The current approach is not helping the Eurozone’s most vulnerable members return to growth. It’s not making the core of the Eurozone any less vulnerable to contagion. It’s threatening the survival of the euro. And it is not making the future of European integration any brighter. Ire is rising in Europe towards Germany’s lack of leadership on the euro crisis. Luxembourg’s prime minister, Jean-Claude Juncker accused Germany of being “un-European” after it rejected the proposal for a European bond.

Hopefully, a little rest over the Christmas holidays will give the leaders of Europe a bit more perspective on where their monetary union is headed, and some enhanced willingness to do what it takes to ensure its success. Without that, Portugal will have a hard time avoided a bailout. Then the next domino is Spain, an economy so large that a rescue would test the resources – and the viability – of the Eurozone. Europe’s 2011 could be as ugly as its 2010 – if not even uglier.

Related Topics: Wall Street & Markets
  • Latest on Business

    Brendan McDermid / Reuters

    Facebook’s Stock Falls Below $30 for First Time

    (NEW YORK) — Facebook’s stock has fallen below $30 for the first time since its much-awaited public debut this month.

    The Jury Is Out on the EuroSlate

    U.S. consumer prices rose faster than expected in May. (Mario Anzuoni / Reuters)

    Consumer Confidence in the Economy Plunged in May

    NEW YORK — American confidence in the economy suffered the biggest drop in eight months as worries about the weak jobs, housing and stock markets rattled them again. The decline comes after a few months of optimism amid some positive economic news.

  • http://rodgermmitchell.wordpress.com Rodger Malcolm Mitchell

    Mr. Schuman is correct in predicting it’s “likely the Eurozone will continue to suffer bailout after bailout. Bailouts merely lend money to nations that cannot service their current debt.
    .
    Bailouts do not solve the fundamental problem: many of the EU nations are not Monetarily Sovereign. It is mathematically impossible for a monetarily non-sovereign government to exist long-term, without money coming in from outside. Monetarily non-sovereign nations must have a positive balance of trade, or they will run out of money. But every nation cannot depend on a positive balance of trade.
    .
    Inflation reduces the value of money each year, so a nation that does not have the power to create money, loses total money value each year, leading to recession.
    .
    By contrast, the U.S., which is Monetarily Sovereign, can exist and grow with a negative balance of trade, forever. Debt-hawks do no understand this, because they do not understand Monetary Sovereignty.
    .
    There are but two solutions to the EU problem. Either:
    .
    1. France, Italy et al stop using the euro and revert to their own sovereign currencies
    or
    2. The EU assumes the role of sovereign nation and supplies euros to all its members.
    .
    Any other “solution,” worst of all, austerity, will extend and worsen the crisis. Now, they have to teach the debt-hawks that.
    .
    Rodger Malcolm Mitchell

  • waynebernard

    How long will it be before the world’s bond ratings agencies decide that the United States is no longer creditworthy? For the first 2 months of fiscal 2011 alone, Washington has overspent its revenues by more than the total annual GDP of all but 30 nations in the world as shown here:

    http://viableopposition.blogspot.com/2010/12/united-states-deficit-is-us-too-big-to.html

    Or, is the United States deemed too big to fail simply because it is the world’s choice as a reserve currency?

  • 94134gamesmith

    Gamesmith94134: The Dark Ages, Returned In Full

    First, I like you to read the response from Nicolas Mudie who spoke the best of the European and Euro in the words to Mr. Schauble.

    nicholas mudie | March 13 10:37am | Permalink
    Good critique. I, Iike you, had difficulty associating the purport of the article with a sentient being that is both a politician on the international stage and supposed to be in charge of policy in the biggest European economy. I would have written as follows:

    Serwus Schäuble!

    Be careful what you wish for. Bear in mind you have had a pre-payment of benefits of the Euro for the last decade. Had Club Med not been in a fixed exchange rate regime the lirapesetadrachma price of BMW’s would of gone out of sight for the ordinary consumer except for those unfortunately quite large sections of these societies that don’t pay any meaningful taxes on income. The other element from which Germany has benefited and not connected to the existence of Euro has been a world awash with cheap money which has allowed the Club Med worker and others to borrow at what are for him/her historically cheap rates of interest.

    Most people would agree that with fiscal balances out of kilter in most of the G20, interest rates are going North which makes the purchase of big ticket items from machine tools to cars ( both a German speciality) a lot less likely. If in addition you progressively force the weaker southern periphery out of the Euro, the rump currency the “ DiMbo” will rocket in price and BMW’s will become harder to sell not only in the Club Med but also elsewhere in the world.

    It could just be, that if you can get anyone to do some realistic discounted cash flow sums, it would be better for the German taxpayer to pay out now for a rescue. Suitably dressed up with admonishments of course. This smudge would keep the Euro down and enable Germany to export to both the rest of the world and those ghastly spendthrift chaps to the South.

    If you take my advice, do it quickly before your own fiscal balances get some further calls e.g carrying on with Kurzarbeit subsidies and the cost of coming clean about all the German bank balance sheets – what happened to those stress tests by the way? We’ve seen the Landesbanken and the Hypo Bank troubles but I’m sure there’s more to come even if it’s only the cost of writing off the debts of the Ex Euro Club Med countries.

    Viele Gruesse aus Italien

    Perhaps, Mr. Krugman, you should understand the habitat named fresh water and salt water. with its own eco-system, there is no semi-salt water; or everyone die. We will come to the dark ages regardless the QEII, or other remedial measures may apply. It is the zoning that makes it separated but equal. More salt or more water does not work. Does Mr. Bernanke or Mr. Geithner know the differences?

    May the Buddha bless you?

    Gamesmith94134: The Dark Ages, Returned In Full

    In Chinese idioms, there is a word that best suit for our situation, “draw a biscuit to cure the starved”. This is how we lived on credit for so long, it is so vague. I also like the letter by Warren Buffet to Uncle Sam that ‘Pretty Good for Government Work’ that he gave his word on the Apocalypse now to our assets on commercial paper and real estates. Does a bigger biscuit need to cure the larger starve?
    Just forget how hard we trumped China to raise the renminbi to relieve the deficit or cut its surplus? There is not any financial tool that we, American, can apply; in the lesser of, interest rate or real estate that we are sub-prime now. More liquidity to the money supply with no intermediate industry to revive, it is more biscuit for American and more inflation to the EM nations. Devaluation of dollar or real estate can only make US business more anemic; because they depend on credit too. Monetarism is only an idea that can be applied a measurement to what is being produced and it is not a product you can consume. Actually, QEII acts perfectly in its enclosed environment like North Korea where there is only one authority; but when it mixed other currencies; it is counterproductive because we cannot make other pay on their investment to America. Does Mr. Bernanke or Mr. Geithner know Uno-dollar can kill if the inflation on the EM nations persists? Inflation will halt all progress if the EM nations suffer further invasion by the leverage on QEII; then, the world recession is not too far. I mean totally, not even China with the most surplus, it has already outspent itself with domestic development.
    Perhaps, it is time that they must convince them that habitat counts. Debts and trades are individual matter that currencies must come to a common ground that each must allow to survive under its condition and limit. We must be more sensitive on the issues individual to compromise after each raise its questions on requirements to survive and each set on limits on monopoly. If we can guarantee a mutual understanding on the ethical standard that doing business can be cooperative and harmonious in its separated but equal manner. Then, currencies can go back to its origin as a measurement on transaction, instead of another tool for invasion.
    The Currencies warfare ends if we all can settle on its own ground with the benefits from trades with others. Money counts and dollar and euro you don’t eat.
    May the Buddha bless you?

  • http://erieangel.wordpress.com erieangel

    The other day Moody’s had stated that the tax Obama/McConnell tax deal will lead to them lowering the US rating. I knew from the beginning this deal was no good. And it seems the leaders, whom we elect to do what is best for our country don’t much care. It is going to be good for the wealthiest Americans and I guess that is all that counts anymore.

  • tanboontee

    The article and the comments followed have painted a rather gloomy and cloudy picture for Eurozone in 2011, a rare projection from Time.

    In short, the Euro will likely collapse, thus disintegrating Eurozone in the not so distant future. The question, I repeat what I said before, is “when” not “if”. (btt1943)

  • 94134gamesmith

    Gamesmith94134: Europe’s debt Gamesmith94134: Europe’s debt crisis: An uglier 2011?
    Timing is limited to the effects after QE last month from Germany and ECB. Based on the austerity programs extended in Europe, the break down can be signed after first quarter in April if the public support cannot be sustained on the agreement even after participation of FED’s QEIII. In assumption, the causes on the rupture is of the link on the GDP ratio, the budgetary setting can be disruptive to the public, then, riot may be inevitable. Collapse of Italy, Spain, and Greece may cause the Domino effect in the chain of States, proposal on resolution would be discussed in the G20 meeting, and October can be bloody. Just before all finance ministers may or not to agree to accept a single proposal for another QE that most hated; British Pound and rubles must be acknowledged as another alternatives to Euro. This is a nightmare and return of the Dark Age.
    This is not prophesying, and it is the worst scenario.
    May the Buddha Bless you?

  • http://rbmatudan.wordpress.com rbmatudan

    It’s always hard to get back on track, and although the economy is getting better little by little, let us not take for granted the political aspect which is one factor that pulls the economy. http://www.pathtoasia.com/jobs/

blog comments powered by Disqus