China’s inflation problem and the perils of unconventional policy

China’s currency problem looks to be growing (Photo: REUTERS)

The only thing that surprises me about China’s spike in inflation is that it took so long to show itself. Some economists had been worried for a while that a combination of rapid growth, giant stimulus, a mammoth credit expansion and the effect of high commodity prices would cause an inflation problem for China. Inflation hit 5.1% in November, the fastest clip since the pre-crisis boom months of 2008. Though much of the increase is in food (up 11.7% from a year earlier), the inflationary pressures are spreading to more aspects of the economy. According to Goldman Sachs, housing-related prices (such as rent, management fees, etc.) rose an annualized 21.6% in November.

Inflation is a serious matter in China, since the still-poor populace gets hit very hard when inflation rises, both due to higher living expenses, but also since it eats into the value of their large savings. Chinese policymakers have been struggling to stamp out inflationary pressures for several months, but without much impact. In part, that’s because they’ve been reluctant to raise interest rates — the usual inflation-fighting tool used by central bankers. Rates have been hiked only once this year. The reasons why show us how tricky a spot China’s government now finds itself in, as a result of unconventional economic policies and political stubbornness.

From the Chinese standpoint, there are likely two big problems with increasing interest rates. First, higher interest rates would attract more money from outside the country, putting even greater pressure on the yuan to appreciate. And China’s policymakers have made clear that a strengthening yuan is not an option. A commentary in a central bank-owned newspaper on Thursday said that maintaining the “basic stability” of the exchange rate was “advantageous.” That’s Chinese government-speak for “the yuan ain’t going nowhere.” By resisting yuan appreciation, the Chinese are also removing yet another tool they could use to fight inflation. (A stronger currency brings down the prices of imports.) Perhaps the Chinese don’t want the yuan to rise because they’re still worried about the competitiveness of their exports amid the weak global recovery. Or their resistance could be a result of its foreign-policy position, an insistence on standing firm against international criticism of its currency regime. The Chinese government insists the yuan is just fine where it is, and it would rather deal with inflation in other ways than concede that the yuan needs to be stronger.

The second problem with interest rate hikes has to do with domestic levels of debt. Over the past two years, China has witnessed an incredible surge in bank lending – a product of government stimulus policies, to hold up growth during the global downturn. That surge built up debt levels at Chinese companies and local governments. By hiking interest rates, the central bank would be increasing the interest burden on borrowers. That, in turn, could intensify a bad loan problem at China’s banks that many economists believe is an inevitable result of the lending boom.

So instead of raising rates, officials have tried to curtail the lending to squelch inflation by raising the reserve requirement at the banks – in other words, forcing the banks keep more money parked at home, which reins in the amount of loans they can issue. Last Friday, that rate was raised for the sixth time this year, to an all-time high. But the impact has been somewhat limited. The number of new loans made this year will likely bust through the government’s target of $1.1 trillion for 2010. In a recent report, Fitch analysts figured that lending in China is in reality much higher than even that, because the banking sector has found ways of artificially reducing their loan holdings, by, for example, turning them into off-balance sheet wealth-management investments. (Sound familiar?) If credit growth roars on, the Chinese central bank will have a lot of trouble controlling inflation.

So the Chinese have instead turned to an old favorite, price controls on certain staple foods. Perhaps China’s mix of reserve ratio increases and price suppression will eventually come to control inflation, but there seems to be consensus among economists that these methods won’t be sufficient, and that the central bank will eventually have to turn to the traditional method of rate hikes, perhaps even implementing one before the end of the year.

Higher interest rates will knock over all of the other dominoes in China’s economy. The government will have to intervene even more drastically in currency markets to restrain the yuan from strengthening. Companies, both state and private, government entities and consumers will be pinched by higher debt payments. The impact will likely be moderate at first, since economists don’t expect China’s central bank to raise rates too sharply. Instead, China’s policymakers will try to use those alternative methods – especially reserve ratio increases – to control inflation. But if that doesn’t work, we’ll be looking at more rate increases, and more fallout for the economy.

Having used unconventional policies during the downturn – government-induced bank lending and exchange rate manipulation – China is stuck with unconventional methods of inflation fighting. It’s interesting times for the policy gurus in Beijing.

Related Topics: Economy & Policy, Wall Street & Markets
  • Latest on Business

    Brendan McDermid / Reuters

    Facebook’s Stock Falls Below $30 for First Time

    (NEW YORK) — Facebook’s stock has fallen below $30 for the first time since its much-awaited public debut this month.

    The Jury Is Out on the EuroSlate

    U.S. consumer prices rose faster than expected in May. (Mario Anzuoni / Reuters)

    Consumer Confidence in the Economy Plunged in May

    NEW YORK — American confidence in the economy suffered the biggest drop in eight months as worries about the weak jobs, housing and stock markets rattled them again. The decline comes after a few months of optimism amid some positive economic news.

  • http://rodgermmitchell.wordpress.com Rodger Malcolm Mitchell

    Inflation is the loss in value of money compared to the value of goods and services. The cure for inflation is to increase the value of money or to decrease the value of goods and services.
    .
    The later is virtually impossible for any government to accomplish, so increasing the value of money is the only prevention/cure for inflation, and that best is accomplished by raising interest rates.
    .
    China’s reluctance to strengthen its currency probably is tied to its false belief it must continue to build its export business. The function of exports is to bring money into an economy, but China, being Monetarily Sovereign does not need additional money coming in from outside. It has the unlimited ability to create money.
    .
    The Chinese government has the ability to be its nation’s own best customer. This is a fact for all monetarily sovereign nations.
    .
    China has the means to cure its inflation by raising interest rates. It only needs to understand its own powers.
    .
    Rodger Malcolm Mitchell

  • nhautamaki

    This is all somewhat concerning to me as I’m currently in the market for an apartment in China. Would you recommend holding off on my purchase for the time being to see what the banks and the economy do?

  • http://vksaini.wordpress.com vksaini

    China has wisely used tool of increase in Banks’ reserves instead of increasing interest rates to arrest rising inflation as it affects Banks’ directly and the people in general as it decreases the floating money in the economy helpful to check inflation. If this fails to arrest inflation then China has no other alternative than to increase interest rates and import more goods & services to meet the demand of its expanding economy. However China needs to remain continuously watchful of real estate lest a bubble forms to burst at a later stage.

  • gatesvp

    Having used unconventional policies during the downturn…

    To be fair, I think most economic powers are in the realm of “unconventional” right now.

    The treatment of the Euro doesn’t really have a precedent. TARP and QE(2) are really without equivalent precedents.

    This article sprinkles all kinds of negative connotation words like “unconventional” & “regime” & “political stubboness”. But it’s not really clear that this is anything more than ignorant jingoism.

    How is China’s behaviour and use of tools significantly less valid than the current economic tools in use within the US, UK or Euro zone?

  • http://rodgermmitchell.wordpress.com Rodger Malcolm Mitchell

    gatesup

    You asked, “How is China’s behaviour and use of tools significantly less valid than the current economic tools in use within the US, UK or Euro zone?”
    .
    The U.S., U.K. and China are Monetarily Sovereign. EU nations such as France, Greece and Ireland are monetarily non-sovereign. The difference is significant.
    .
    Monetarily Sovereign nations cannot run out of money. They have the unlimited ability to create money, constrained only by inflation. So, debt is no problem for them.
    .
    The same cannot be said of the monetarily non-sovereign nations. They do not have the unlimited ability to create money, so debt can be (and currently is) a huge problem for them.
    .
    China can continue to pump money into its economy, while raising interest rates to prevent inflation. So can the U.S. and the U.K.
    .
    Greece et al cannot.
    .
    This is all to say that the tools available to China, the U.S. and the U.K are significantly different from the meager tools available to the euro nations.
    .
    Rodger Malcolm Mitchell

  • paganbarbarian

    The residential real estate market will almost certainly only get worse over the next five years. You could gamble on government-funded public housing in large apartment buildings being constructed and available within five years, if you can wait that long. If you must have a home-base you personally own, your best bet is to buy as soon as possible, before mortgage rates and special fees go up any more. Again, if you must buy and own, buy as upscale as you can afford, for the investment value and high collateral for any necessary future loans.

  • paganbarbarian

    Internet gossip inside China claims that hundreds, if not thousands of elite families in government and state-owned companies are very heavily invested in residential real estate. The current gossip focus is the effort to identify the worst families, in which rumor asserts every single family member, from babies to great-grand-parents own at least 20 houses or condos. That’s every parent, every aunt and uncle, every son and daughter, every nephew and niece, and so on. At least 20 properties each. Obviously, posting the names of these families on an internet chatroom is an extremely dangerous act, especially without proof, but names are still popping up on a daily basis. If the gossip is true, the total share of the market held by the families cited could be large enough to influence the real estate market of the entire nation.

  • Michael Schuman

    Thanks for your comment. If you noticed, I didn’t make any comparisons between Chinese or U.S. or European economic policy here. My point is not that China’s policy is “better” or “worse” than others. What I’m trying to show is how there are basic rules to economics that, if broken, have negative consequences. That’s true of policy in any country. My impression is that there is a belief these days that China’s policy is somehow superior to that of the West, that Beijing has it all figured out and we don’t. Maybe that will ultimately prove true, but my point is that Chinese policymakers get themselves into trouble just like everybody else, and have to suffer from the fallout of their decisions.

  • duduong

    Hey, you forgot to highlight “Monetarily Sovereign” in red this time. We don’t want people to forget that printing more money is the solution to all economic ills, do we?

  • http://rodgermmitchell.wordpress.com Rodger Malcolm Mitchell

    duduong,
    .
    For all you who don’t find my comments about Monetary Sovereignty believable, perhaps you will find another voice more persuasive. Go to: Chartalism and read the paragraph titled “Conclusions.”
    .
    While I differ with the Chartalists on several points, the foundations of Chartalism and Monetary Sovereignty are identical.
    .
    Enjoy.
    .
    Rodger Malcolm Mitchell

  • duduong

    A so-called management consultant who has no real business experience does not impress me one bit. You may want to tone down your self-promotional website a little. It screams “crack pot” so loud that it is deafening.

    It is not your crazy rants that bothers me. It is the unvarying repetitiveness. Do you even have the capacity to consider each subject on its own merits? I have seen you commenting on all kinds of macro- and micro-economic issues, some of which were down to individual industry/company level, and yet your prescription is always printing more “free money”, with the phrase Monetary Sovereign highlighted in red or bold.

    Perhaps I made a mistake mocking you earlier. Your own writing does all the mocking already. Yet I am interested in reading some other people’s comments. Having you disrupt the chain of discussion just proved too frustrating that day.

  • http://rodgermmitchell.wordpress.com Rodger Malcolm Mitchell

    duduong,

    Thank you for your fact-based, data-filled opinions, which because they obviously are founded in the science of economics, are quite educational. I’m sorry you are too frustrated to take the time to learn something. I suspect that is a condition which has followed you your entire life.

blog comments powered by Disqus