Housing Drop: More Bad News for the Economy

The new homes market is looking more and more barren (Photo: Chris Keane/REUTERS)

It might be time to bring back the home buyer tax credit.

On Wednesday, a day after the National Association of Realtors said sales of existing homes dropped 2.2% in October, the Census Bureau said that new home sales had dropped a full 80% below their peak. Just 23,000 new homes were sold last month. That was the worst October for housing sales on record. The previous low was set 29 years ago in October 1981, when 29,000 homes were sold. In 2005, 105,000 houses sold in October of that year, or more than 4 times the number sold last month.

So how big a drag will housing be on the economy in 2011? Potentially a big one. Here’s why:

The construction industry, which is driven by new home sales, has been a major source of unemployment in the current recession. For a sense at how bad the industry has been hit consider this: While the construction industry typically employs about 5% of all workers, it currently makes up about 10% of all those who are now unemployed. In October, 1.4 million construction workers were without jobs. What’s more, the unemployment rate among construction workers was the highest by far of any industry the Bureau of Labor Statistics tracks. The unemployment rate among construction worker is 17.3%. Leisure and hospitality, the industry with the next highest, has an unemployment rate of 11.1%. And that’s just the out of work people who used to build the houses. There are also realtors and mortgage brokers and title company employees that are out of work or out of a lot of work not that fewer houses are selling.

But what may be more important is that housing is not just a source of employment, it’s also a big driver of spending. First of all, unemployment in the construction industry is likely to have a bigger drag on spending than say layoffs on Wall Street. Construction workers are not as likely to have severance or as large savings as higher paid workers that could allow them to maintain consumption even after they lose their jobs.

Second, it wasn’t only sales that dropped in the housing market. Home prices took a big hit as well. The average price of a new home dropped nearly 14% in October from the month before. Yes, that’s 14% in one month. Remember when they used to say housing prices never drop. In October, the average new home sold for $194,400. The last time that average was below $200,000 was back in December 2003. It’s like the housing boom never happened.

While the lower prices is a boon for those buying right now, it’s also another drag on consumption. Even if one is not thinking of selling, studies show that lower house prices cause homeowners to spend less. We feel poorer. And when new homes fall in price it makes it harder for the rest of us to sell our homes.

And here’s where we get to the case of reinstating the home buyer tax-credit. The real estate slump, if it continues in 2011 as it is looking more likely it will, will remain a big drag on the economy. You can say a lot of bad things about the home buyer tax credit, which allowed people who bought a house to deduct $8,000 from their taxes. But fact is it worked. Home sales and prices went up. Yes, it pulled prices forward and may be the reason we are slumping now, but that is the point of stimulus to pull sales forward from the future until the economy catches up.

What’s more, unlike most other forms of stimulus spending. A re-up of the home buyer tax credit is probably something that could pass the newly divided Congress. Republicans like tax cuts. And the real estate and home building lobby is a powerful one especially with Republicans. And both would really like to see the tax credit come back.

What’s more, a new survey from Fannie Mae survey showed the number of people who said it was a good time to buy a home dropped to 68%. That was down 2% from the month before. But it still suggests that there are a fair number of people who would buy a house, given a push.

Related Topics: Economy & Policy, real estate, Economy & Policy
  • Latest on Business

    Brendan McDermid / Reuters

    Facebook’s Stock Falls Below $30 for First Time

    (NEW YORK) — Facebook’s stock has fallen below $30 for the first time since its much-awaited public debut this month.

    The Jury Is Out on the EuroSlate

    U.S. consumer prices rose faster than expected in May. (Mario Anzuoni / Reuters)

    Consumer Confidence in the Economy Plunged in May

    NEW YORK — American confidence in the economy suffered the biggest drop in eight months as worries about the weak jobs, housing and stock markets rattled them again. The decline comes after a few months of optimism amid some positive economic news.

  • http://randomkirk.wordpress.com randomkirk

    Stephen, I seem to recall your support of elimination of the mortgage deduction because home ownership was something government should not be supporting. So which is it? Encourage home ownership, or not?

    Using the tax credit might have a short-term effect on the housing market, but the simple fact is that credit is far tighter now, home prices do not appear to have stabilized, and many people are still fearful for their jobs.

    Unless and until regulators are told to back off, banks and other mortgage lenders are only going to make mortgages for the AAA-rated borrower, and there are fewer and fewer of them every day because the economy continues to drag more people into financial distress.

    To paraphrase a familiar line, “Its the credit availability, stupid!”

  • http://gum0nshoe.wordpress.com gumOnShoe

    You aren’t suggesting that regulators themselves are preventing good loans from happening, right?
    ·
    I mean, ultimately the bankers have the say on who gets loans, and last I heard applications for loans were down, not what you’re suggesting (which is that applications are being made, but are rejected due to regulation).
    ·
    And it goes beyond credit availability and more towards wage availability. If people don’t have faith that their pay is going to go up or that their positions are stable, then they don’t invest in big items or attempt to change the status quo.
    ·
    If you want housing to pick up, the wealth imbalance of this country has to be fixed.
    ·
    It is not a fluke that we are simultaneously back at the wealth imbalance that was present during the great depression, that businesses are making record profits, that the top 1% is earning most of the money, the people at the bottom haven’t seen wage increases or anything else in some time, and that because of those things house prices are falling.
    ·
    The average person’s income is not growing, while it does for those at the top. Do the math & demand won’t be that confusing.

  • robert1952

    The US has too many homes. Until new household formation along with the natural destruction of old houses create a need for new housing, any policy encouraging new home construction is a bad idea. Government at all levels over the decades has made a real mess of housing. From the mortgage interest deduction to the invention of the artificial 30-year mortgage–not to mention many other housing interventions like rent control–we are paying a price whose seeds go back a century. At least there are a nice number of Mac-Mansions available at discount prices for those who otherwise would not have the means to live in such style!

  • http://erieangel.wordpress.com erieangel

    @gumonshoe: I couldn’t agree with you more. The income disparage has everything to do with our economic problems these days. Its also no accident that we have such a wealth imbalance today; the republican party has been pushing for it since the days of Reagan. And since Reagan and the “deregulation party” we’ve seen a recession about every 5 years. One has to wonder if lack of regulation is really a good idea.

  • geaugailluminati

    yeah, that smart, with nearly 19 million vacant homes, let’s initiate a policy to encourage the building of more…

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/04/26/number-of-vacant-homes-in_n_552274.html

    to someone with a hammer, everything looks like a nail…

  • http://naturecoastcreativecontent.wordpress.com naturecoastcreativecontent

    I’d like to see a few things happen that I think would change our future dramatically. (1) Open our borders. An influx of immigrants has been the driving force behind a majority of our countries past economic gains, i.e. the industrial revolution. More people=less homes on the market as well. (2) Reinstate the CCC and WPA. A mandatory servitude of 18-20 year olds for two years in a homeland peace corp/ccc/wpa. Not only will it provide jobs, it will help fix our antiquated infrastructure and better our country. Maybe build a sustainable clean energy electrical grid? (3) Free education for all. After serving in one of the above mentioned public service corps, give away free college/vocational/trade schools. (4) Turn our cities in powerhouses of technology. Once we have smart kids, an oversea workforce that’s not overseas and a powerful infrastructure, we can focus on what this country truly does great–invent new technologies.

    I’m no economic strategist by any means, but it seems to me that these four ideas could( and have in the past) fix some of our economic woes.

    What do you think?

    OK, start ripping me a new one in the comments!

  • 94134gamesmith

    Gamesmith94134: Housing Drop: More Bad News for the Economy
    It is more like Japanification after the devaluation of yens in the 1980s. Anemic as can be that 17% construction worker will remain out of job till the real estate is afloat. I mean even the QEII can ease the tension of the cash flows in the budgetary system, the Americans is out of bound in pursuit of their dream homes or any foreigner dare to buy them at discount. Besides, the Congress is convinced putting American on sales is not their best desires; it is why it stopped further foreclosures.

    Months ago, we have eighteen months foreclosure sales of surplus on the market. I was not count on the up-dates on the foreclosures that bank gulped with high risk investment and paid higher insurance. Just in order to stabilize the premium deposits that the new law required; the six major banks were loaded with the foreclosures might need another $160 billion to make it to the level. On the other hand, we have estimated the trillion in fixing the Freddies, and I would expect the 600 billion dollars in the coming years would be the precautionary resort on the purpose. In a word, we, the US government held back on the falling price on the real estate; and paid the premiums on the defaulted; and it continues……

    Now, all major banking and financials are throttled on the bottle neck from the litigation on the foreclosure that capped the outburst of the eminent falling price of the real estates. At the same time, the present wealthy Americans are trapped in the liquidity trap that our banking and financial are eating the their pension and saving alive; with less on the interest rate increase and heated tax levies, the pool of saving will dry up soon even under the condition that no eminent fallout on the monetary market or after dollars devalued. Tax credit like $8000 helped to shuffle the sales over months; but the credit approval by bank comes only with excellent credit or collaterals and sales goes slower. As long as the construction companies and workers understand there is a two year surplus on houses that is going to the market, unemployment would change little. Whether the bank can escape the burden on litigation or the congress is willing to let the foreigner to buy off these properties; loan and credit would become worse on American.

    Apparently, the double dip recession could not be eliminated if the pricing on the real estate is no settled or the earning on average American improves sufficiently to override the currently price of the real estate, provided the banking recuperated after closing its 600 more banks after 2011. Many economist gave the best prophesy on the 2015-2018 that unemployment would down to 5-6%; I doubt if the picture can be that rosy as can be if the restructuring on the price of real estate and relief on the coverage on the risky real estate do not make its turn on time. More banks will be mauled and more American will lose his job. I may sound too stubborn on the change of the value in housing or dollar; but the double dip remain over-shadowed my head. Japanification is word I do understand, but this time dollar devalued. What does it make the difference? Let us pray.

    May the Buddha bless you?

  • http://archialternative.wordpress.com Albert

    This is a disaster. But to suggest some cosmetic temporary measures such as a “reinstating the home buyer tax-credit…until the economy catches up” is an utter stupidity. What if it doesn’t catch up? Should we keep printing dollars? You know what: let’s build the New Economy instead of prolonging the agony.

    http://archialternative.com/2010/11/22/new-economy/

    “I say let the U.S. economy collapse. It’s not serving us anyway…”

  • 94134gamesmith

    Gamesmith94134: Devaluing History II

    There is a different between the 90 and now; America was blooming and now we are not. If we expect blooming from export, can we bring the Irish, Spain, and Greece out of the Austerity program? Or we can smack ourselves couple more time; so other can tell how muscular we are rather from swelling.
    Perhaps, we understand gangrene to the limb, if it is worsening, it kills. Amputation was not a nice way to cure the disease, but there is a lesser suitable solution to gamble on the devalue dollars and our export do not bloom and the Emerging Market Nations are busy treating hyperinflation. The moment of time for the correction on the pricing on these foreclosures would stop the bleeding from the assets of America. If we might not get 5% raise each year for next three consecutive years, we will not keep the real estate afloat, and interest rate will remain low even we were hit by hyperinflation. Then, the anemic economy would definitively eat away our pension, salary and equity till we can outgrow the present economy. In the way of the QEII going, it can be a bottomless depression in a long run if its action brings on depreciation of dollars; and Emerging Nations would resist to use dollar as the currency to trade among themselves like China and Russian in their trade agreement (it was announced to-day).
    I only thought amputation was the best at this moment of time for American economy; I doubt if devalued dollar can benefit us from trade more. I am not certain other would have mercy on us in buying more; in creation on a freefall on the prices on real estate can halt hyperinflation and free banks from the risky foreclosures. In order to treat our fail economy, we must admit the imbalance of the price on future assets and value most Americans can bear. Real estate and finance are the diseases killing America’s Asset. Why keep feeding into it? The cure to gangrene must be shift and painful, and it save life.
    May the Buddha bless you?

  • http://rbmatudan.wordpress.com rbmatudan

    The “financial meltdown” was a result of greed and people making money without creating extended real value. And as long as this cancerous behavior is allowed, our standard of living will deteriorate. As long as working class Americans keep footing the bill and just take it up the tail pipe, the cycle will continue.

    http://www.pathtoasia.com/jobs/

  • dochosvet

    It is sad that the go-go years are gone and some of my clients in housing are out work and at best are hanging in only because their mate has a job some where else. But housing was a stupid bubble. I have small double wide on two acres that when I put it together years ago was worth about $65,000. The last few years realtors would tell me it was worth $250,000. Now I may have found a fool to pay that if I wanted to move but it was no where near that valuable if you are honest and know the value of your money. So I think we have a ways to go before we get to real value. Now if we could just convince the property tax man who was riding the same bubble. I just got an increased valuation for some property in the mountains that takes 55 minutes to drive 5.5 miles to it. Suddenly I am “15.000″ dollars richer according to the tax man. I probably couldn’t give it away even if it does have an interesting view.
    The point being we have not lived in a “real” world for some time and we are going to have settle some more to what ever life can really support.

  • http://stephenpoo.wordpress.com stephenpoo

    Would not rip you apart many good thoughts here and maybe if things get worse and stay that way some of them will be implemented.
    Everyone with a house has an interest in creating a market and keeping prices from falling futher.
    If the tax credit does some good why not?
    Have something better try that too.

blog comments powered by Disqus