More Fed Easing: A Help or Hurt To Markets?

World markets are practically giddy in their expectation for a new round of easing by the US Federal Reserve. As the Financial Times noted Thursday morning, “the FTSE All-World index is up 0.8 percent to its best level since September 2008. The benchmark has climbed 14% in six weeks–a period in which traders’ risk appetite has risen with every hint that the US Federal Reserve stands ready to inject further liquidity into the economy.” Yes, it’s a whooped-up world market hoping for holiday cheer from the Fed. But when it happens, will the markets still be cheering?

Specifically,  the November FOMC meeting is when, by all indications, the Fed will launch a new round of quantitative easing (QE2) to address the economy’s continued weakness. It’s not just GDP the Fed wants to goose, but also inflation–a message the Fed floated in the September FOMC minutes:

Inflation had declined since the start of the recession and most participants indicated that underlying inflation was at levels somewhat below those that they judged to be consistent with the Committee’s dual mandate for maximum employment and price stability.

This we-need-more-inflation sentiment was also confirmed in a recent speech by New York Fed President  William Dudley. It will most likely translate into action in the form of purchasing $100 billion or so per month of U.S. Government bonds, as most Fed watchers see it. The financial markets anticipate all this and so investors’ risk appetite lately  is pretty voracious. But when the easing does happen, due to the inconvenient truths of global economics,  it may not all go as swimmingly as the markets think.  Here’s how Goldman Sachs global economists Dominic Wilson and Stacy Carlson frame the problem:

The fact that Fed has said explicitly that it wants to see inflation higher and that it has laid the ground for fresh easing puts it on a very different course to that mapped out by many other central banks around the world.

That is, many central banks are starting to tighten, worried as they are about the possibility of destabilizing inflation down the road. But the Fed wants a bit of the inflation genie and so is moving the other way. Quantitative easing–i.e., printing money, which is what the Fed will effectively do with these purchases–will quickly translate into an even weaker dollar, which will be bad news for foreign central bankers in the developed world, who see their competitiveness slip.  Put yourself in their shoes: They see themselves as  fighting the good fight against inflation and they are about to get clobbered for it as their currencies rise. Given that China’s currency is pegged to the dollar, it’s a double dose of bad news for those beleaguered central bankers.

What will the world’s central bankers do? Some governments will surely accommodate the Fed and loosen their own monetary policies. Others will try to intervene in the currency markets in ways that do not result in more liquidity in their economy, but such maneuvers are imperfect.  Some central banks may not play ball at all and there the options are less pleasant. Tariffs and other protectionist moves to protect local industries is one possible step if the political pressure grows intense.

In the U.S., as most see it, the next round of Fed’s asset purchases will help the U.S. employment numbers a bit, keep interest rates low  and prevent  the economy from slipping into the red.

But will investors embrace the Fed easing if the U.S. economy continues to muddle along and the global discussion is filled with tariff talk?  Richard Cookson, chief investment strategist at Citi’s private bank, is warning his clients that the great market rally may succumb to some of  these issues. Here is his summary thought to clients this week

Protectionism, currency wars and Fed that does less than the markets expect are, short-term anyway, the ingredients for a pretty noxious cocktail. So enjoy the rally while it lats: the risks, it seems to us, are rising.

Related Topics: Economy & Policy, federal reserve, Economy & Policy
  • Latest on Business

    Shannon Stapleton / Reuters

    Facebook, Wall Street Banks Sued Over Pre-IPO Financial Forecasts

    Just days after its controversial IPO, Facebook and its Wall Street bankers have been hit by shareholder lawsuits alleging that the social networking giant and its underwriters concealed the company’s decelerating revenue growth from investors. The lawsuits come amid a growing furor about whether Facebook’s banks selectively disclosed information that gave favored clients an unfair advantage over other investors. Top U.S. regulators have begun examining the IPO, and now the U.S. Senate Banking Committee and other lawmakers want answers from Facebook about issues raised in the offering’s aftermath, according to The Hill newspaper.

    Why Greece Isn't Leaving the Eurozone YetSlate

    Associated Press

    Small Dairies Go Under as Milk Prices Sink Again

    PLAINFIELD, Vt. — The MacLaren brothers are third-generation dairy farmers, but they will likely be the last in their family.

    After working all their lives on the hillside farm in Vermont that their grandfather bought in 1939, rising to milk cows at 3 a.m., even in blizzards and sub-zero temperatures, they decided to call it quits, auctioning off their roughly 200 cows and equipment ranging from stalls and hoof trimmers to tractors and steel pails.

  • http://rodgermmitchell.wordpress.com Rodger Malcolm Mitchell

    “In the U.S., as most see it, the next round of Fed’s asset purchases will help the U.S. employment numbers a bit, keep interest rates low and prevent the economy from slipping into the red.”
    .
    Or more realistically, the Fed’s asset purchase will do nothing for employment, do nothing for interest rates and do nothing to aid the economy.
    .
    Further, there is zero benefit to the economy from keeping interest rates low, just as 20 rate decreases by Greenspan/Bernanke did nothing for the economy, and in any event, the Fed has control over interest rates without quantitative easing.
    .
    The entire process is a charade. Bernanke reminds me of my grandson, sitting in the back seat of my car, turning his toy steering wheel. He thinks he’s steering the car, but he’s just going along for the ride.
    .
    What should be done is federal deficit spending, which has cured every recession and depression in history (See: Deficit Spending ), but the debt hawks have frightened everyone with their ominous predictions of “unsustainable debt.”

    Since the debt hawks have been calling the federal debt “unsustainable” and a “ticking time bomb” (See: Time Bomb since 1940 or earlier, one might think the public finally would have caught on to their scam. But I guess Abe Lincoln was wrong; you really can fool all the people all the time.

    Rodger Malcolm Mitchell

  • 94134gamesmith

    Gamesmith94134: Bankers Ignored Signs of Trouble on Foreclosures

    Marc, New York City, Said:
    The mortgage crisis is the in September 2008 was stemmed by massive political and economic stimulus by the US government to prevent a liquidation of foreign assets in the USA.

    Believe it or not, the US Government HAS already passed a bill in March 2010, HR2487 passed in the house, which calls for a 30% currency control on foreign investment. (page 27: Offset Provisions – Subtitle A—Foreign Account Tax Compliance).
    As the liquidity trap shown in Japan, Japan government reluctantly accepted to repurchase in US; so this time is whether our Congress dare to accept their offer to buy our delinquent foreclosure in bulk with discount, so, the price can be stabilized at present price at the market, rather than liquidate the foreign assets.Then, we may face bankruptcy of our government, United States of America, or give up our real estate through colonization under dollar we are short of..
    I felt sorry for Mr. Bernanke that he has to promote his Quantitative Easing on the long-term bond that has weakened our dollars. Earlier I criticize his act is being foolish that printing money at low cost; apparently it irritate many and currencies and trade war are at brink. Perhaps, it is time to think something more seriously in sacrificing our gold reserves at Fort Knox. It is the best to get rid of the irrational exuberance on the commodity markets where the most commodities have run up over 15%.
    In assumption, the gold is purchased at $800; it goes on to $1500. A ton of gold can gain a couple tens of billions and such act can diminish its secondary markets. Legally, US would gain substantially and cool off the trading process and inflation. If the gain is returned to the Treasury in paying off the deficit; I call it the real Quantitative Easing and US has given up its gold without sacrifice of our real estate that we, American wells.
    It does not make the gold market collapse, and it eliminate the throw-weight of their excessive cash on hand and piled on the secondary market that blind-folded many on the gold that would never be produced; or they never see. In the threshold of $900 on gold means the credits from the throw weight contracts and futures must be answered to the reality on the supply and demand. This is just economics.
    Besides, Frenchmen and Greeks might not participate to stop such throw-weight program, I hope Mr. Bernanke would really stop the fright on canary at the tunnel, phoenix can only rise among the ashes if we cannot stand up to face on the issues on the global dispute on every nations security that their currencies can stand on its own. I hope Mr. Putin and Mr. Chavez would take my idea in their discussion on their rubles and Pesos. Stop the throw-weight, Start at 15, and stop at 9.
    Perhaps, it is time to decide in giving up the funny money that are only printed by bending the rule; instead we pay our deficit with the gained from the gold in the trade on commodities. We,American play by the rule of the game; and we are not play game on money. And we are serious. I hope Mr. Bernanke can show us some goodwill on the value of our American dollar.
    To solve the problem, I still need a ton and a half of Gold.
    May the Buddha bless you?

  • http://nfljerseys2011.wordpress.com nfljerseys2011

    Thank your for sharing, It’s a interesting news, I like it ~!
    If you’re free to take a look at my site Oh ~!
    Cheap Jerseys, Accept PayPal
    Website: http://www.nfljersey-online.com

  • doublec42

    Rodger, I agree that the Fed purchase of “assets” will do nothing for unemployment. The Fed’s justification for diluting the money supply because of higher than normal unemployment is a seriously naive move (or much worse if intentional).

    However, your deficit spending comment is a little short sided. Our government can’t afford it without rendering our currency as unstable as some 3rd world country or the old Wiemar Republic (Debt to GDP issues and further monetizing the already high debt is a recipe for disaster, see usdebtclock.org).

    The thing you are missing is Government policy. The pathway to prosperity consists of (not limited to) lowering taxes on the rich and corporations. This will create opportunity for businesses worldwide to come to the US and create more jobs and MORE tax revenue for the Treasury. (see “Laffer Curve” on Wikipedia).

    Next item is austerity. Our bloated government needs to be trimmed back…okay drastically cut. The old saying “the left hand doesn’t know what the right hand is doing” is now wholly inadequate. There are now dozens of tentacles infiltrating too much of the private sector. Most of these tentacles are unnecessary and have increased the cost of Government exponentially.

    Other than dismissing the “debt hawks,” I appreciate your contribution.

    Best,

    Charles Cook

blog comments powered by Disqus