Bernanke and the Inflation Fear Bubble

Here’s another data point that gold and other things that are supposed to trade up when inflation spikes are in a bubble: The prices of books about hyperinflation are themselves hyperinflated (from Fortune):

Jens O. Parsson’s out of print economic treatise, Dying of Money: Lessons of the Great German and American Inflations, is selling for $249.90 on Amazon, while an old hard-cover copy of Adam Fergusson’s When Money Dies: the Nightmare of the Weimar Collapse was recently offered at $1,705.63. A rushed paperback UK edition of Fergusson’s book has held onto the number one spot for business books on Amazon UK for more than twenty-six days and is now climbing Amazon’s US rankings, while a scan of Parsson’s previously unavailable book has been posted online for the hand-wringing masses worldwide.

Much like the stifling hyperinflation they describe, it remains unclear where these books first gained traction or exactly when they did. Reports indicated that the rush may have been spurred by the value-investing sage Warren Buffett, who allegedly had an Oprah moment and recommended Fergusson’s book to some banker friends. However, Buffett has since denied that report, saying he never heard of the Thatcherite’s circa-1975 tome. And even if he had, that doesn’t account for the fact that Dying of Money has become an inflated commodity as well.

Worry about hyperinflation has been bubbling up this year. And the weird thing is inflation fears cross ideological lines.  Hyperinflation could be the one thing that keeps both Glenn Beck and Michael Kinsley up at night. When it comes to hyperinflation though, you shouldn’t lose any sleep worrying about it either. Here’s why:

First of all, inflation appears not to be one of the fears that keeps Fed Chair Bernanke up at night either. Bernanke is out talking about the economy today, and he says he sees some risks. But one of those is not inflation. He is predicting that consumers and business spending will slowly increase. So he sees a recovery, but a weak one.

The thing that baffles me the most about the hyperinflation fears is this: There is very little regular inflation, let alone hyper. I would get being worried about hyperinflation if inflation was already running at 5% or 10% a year, which would still be a far stretch from hyperinflation. But we’re not even close to that. In fact, inflation has mostly been non-existent. On some measures it gets as high as 2%. But a number of times over the past year or so, the reading of inflation has been negative, meaning prices are not only not rising, they are falling. Prices look so weak that recently a number of large hedge funds have been positioning themselves to benefit from deflation.

This makes sense for a period in which we have weak economic growth. And since pretty much everyone thinks that will continue. It makes sense that low inflation will continue. But whatever way you lean on the inflation debate this one thing we should all be able to agree on: Either gold or Treasuries are in a bubble, but not both.

Gold prices have shot up because of fears about inflation and the US economy. At the same time, US Treasuries have shot up because the US is seen as a safe haven. The result is that US interest rates remain, despite rising debt and economic uncertainty, at all time lows. We often have more than one bubble forming at the same time. Real estate and credit. Technology stocks and venture capital funds. But these bubbles benefited from the same economic conditions. It is rare that we would have two bubbles that benefit from exactly the opposite investment thesis forming at the same time. Either gold or Treasuries is probably slightly overvalued. And one is really in fully inflated bubble mode, ready to pop. You decide. But you can’t pick both.

Related Topics: Ben Bernanke, bubbles, gold, inflation, investing, Economy & Policy
  • Latest on Business

    Thomas Patterson / Statesman-Journal / AP

    The Bleak Unemployment Report: Is Europe to Blame?

    For the first time in almost a year, the unemployment rate rose to 8.2% in May as the economic recovery appeared to not only slow but almost completely stall. And it gets worse.

    The Jury Is Out on the EuroSlate

    Getty Images

    Smartphones of the Future: 6 Predictions

    Future mobile devices will change the way you do business–in ways you probably can’t even imagine. Here are a few predictions.

  • http://rodgermmitchell.wordpress.com Rodger Malcolm Mitchell

    Fears about hyperinflation are being promulgated by the debt hawks, who as usual have no evidence to support their beliefs.
    .
    Since it now has become clear, even to the most devout debt hawks, that federal deficit spending is absolutely necessary for economic growth, these folks need something with which to bash deficits. That something is inflation or hyperinflation (which by the way, is not inflation on steroids. It is a different animal.)
    .
    Anyone with even an ounce of curiosity can learn that the German and Zimbabwean hyperinflations (the ones most often mentioned), resulted from special circumstances, not in any way related to today’s U.S. circumstances.
    .
    And by the way, if you worry about “regular” inflation, invest in oil, since it is energy costs that have most closely associated with every inflationary move since 1971.
    .
    Rodger Malcolm Mitchell

  • manofsan

    What rubbish. The reason that both gold and treasuries are up, is because of Xeno’s Paradox – The Irresistable Force vs The Immovable Object. I’m talking about US vs China.

    When the elephants fight, it’s the grass that suffers.

    Gold is up due to fears of inflation, aka. US currency erosion. Treasuries are up due to fears of foreign instability, aka. Chinese real estate collapse. When China is the one propping up US currency while also growing its real estate bubble, which will give way first?

    Who is stronger, Bear or Bull? Another way of asking that is – which is stronger, fear or exuberance? The current flight for safety against both inflation and foreign instability indicates that in general, the emotion of fear would win out over the emotion exuberance in a direct confrontation.

    The growing fearful trend means that China’s economy is guaranteed to lose momentum to the point where its real estate bubble cannot be sustained, thus triggering its collapse, along with a flight to the US dollar. China in turn would be forced to pump up its treasury purchases as it resolutely tries to export its way out of recession. This is because Chinese leaders have a lot more to fear than US leaders – Chinese leaders fear the gallows. The same authoritarian system that allows them to impose pain on the masses in the form of low purchasing power, also means that China’s leaders could hang in the event of mass public unrest – at the very least the lower-rung officials would be scapegoated and executed by the elites to appease the public. So it comes down to the US political system being stronger than the Chinese political system.

    Chinese treasury purchases would temporarily buoy the US dollar, and gold’s bubble would easily burst. As China’s exports gradually ramp up, then the US dollar will start to look less attractive again, so that preference for gold would return.

    Etc, etc. A spiraling dance of death?

  • http://rodgermmitchell.wordpress.com Rodger Malcolm Mitchell

    China is the one propping up US currency

    Question: No one on earth can create dollars, except the U.S. government. So why does the U.S. need China to lend us the dollars we solely can create in unlimited quantities?
    .
    Answer: Borrowing by the federal government is an obsolete exercise — a relic of the gold standard days. The federal government neither needs nor uses borrowed money.
    .
    Here’s how the government borrows: First the lender must deposit dollars (not any other currency) into a checking account at the Fed (not any other bank). Then when the lender buys a T-bond, the checking account at the Fed is debited, and the lender’s savings account — also at the Fed — is credited.
    .
    Later when the T-bond matures, the lender’s checking account is debited and the checking account is credited, plus a few extra dollars for interest, which the Treasury creates out of thin air.
    .
    Because the Treasury is the monopoly creator of dollars, and has the unlimited ability to do so, misnamed “borrowing” is a useless process.
    .
    The value of the dollar is based on interest rates, which the Fed sets at will.

    Rodger Malcolm Mitchell

  • nottellingever

    I prepared for hyperinflation by stashing assets abroad.

    The chart near the top of the URL below should show you all the evidence you need to see that avoiding hyperinflation is virtually impossible. There is NO WAY that hiking interest rates up to 10% would be adequate to soak up the excessive dollars once the effects of fractional reserve banking kick in.

    http://swisssolution.webs.com/

    There are plenty of good, solid companies that are in no way connected to the USA. There are many governments and companies with sound finances selling bonds denominated in strong foreign currencies. Switzerland experienced a strong influx of cash looking for safety during the Greek crises because it is a rock solid safe haven.

blog comments powered by Disqus