Today’s GDP Report: Getting Real About the Recession

So it was a humdinger, after all. Friday morning’s GDP report, which is the first stab at estimating growth in the just completed second quarter of 2010, also provides some significant revisions to prior quarter growth estimates. The latter news is perhaps bigger than the 2nd quarter’s 2.4% gain—a bit below the consensus expectation of 2.7%. But what should really rock the boat is that the Commerce department did revisions across the full span of the pre-recession and post-recession period. While this big a revision across multiple quarters  is not unprecedented, it will be an eye opener to many who commonly compare this recession to ones that occurred in the past two decades. What’s now clear is those comparisons were apples to oranges. What we suffered in the past recession—the depth of the contraction— hasn’t been seen since the 1940s.

The Commerce Department presents these revisions  dispassionately, noting that the changes in real GDP are being revised down for all three years in the 2007-2009 time span: : 0.2 percentage point for 2007, 0.4 percentage point for 2008, and 0.2 percentage point for 2009.  That may sound like minor tweaking,  but it is a critically important recognition that the credit blowout that we suffered, and are still suffering, is categorically different than the normal cyclical pressures that bring on recession. Over the span of this recession, according to the Wall Street Journal’s quick tabulation, the economy contracted 4.7% much more than the previous estimate of a 3.7% decline (This assumes recession began in the 4th quarter of 2007 and ended in the second quarter of 2009.)

The shape of the recession is also changing under revision, with the final quarter of 2008—not the first quarter of 2009— now showing to be the worst, with GDP declining 6.8%. That’s much worse that the earlier number, which had the  4th quarter declining 5.4%.

The 2nd quarter’s 2.4% rate will be examined closely in the days ahead, but here’s a first look—i.e., a deconstruction— from chief economist Ian Shepherdson at High Frequency Economics:

Consumption rose only 1.6% in Q2,
much weaker than implied by monthly data, while foreign trade was even
worse than we expected, subtracting a huge 2.8% from the growth.
Capital spending was strong, with equipment and software up 21.9% as
replacement spending soars, and non-res structures rose 5.2%. Housing
jumped 27.8%, thanks to the tax credit; expect a Q3 drop. Federal govt
was strong, defense up 7.4% and non-defense – stimulus – leaped 13.0%.
Inventories added 1.1% to growth; final sales rose only 1.3%. With
inventories likely neutral in Q3, we need final sales to rise and the
trade hit to diminish to get decent GDP growth.

Related Topics: Economy & Policy
  • Latest on Business

    Shannon Stapleton / Reuters

    Facebook, Wall Street Banks Sued Over Pre-IPO Financial Forecasts

    Just days after its controversial IPO, Facebook and its Wall Street bankers have been hit by shareholder lawsuits alleging that the social networking giant and its underwriters concealed the company’s decelerating revenue growth from investors. The lawsuits come amid a growing furor about whether Facebook’s banks selectively disclosed information that gave favored clients an unfair advantage over other investors. Top U.S. regulators have begun examining the IPO, and now the U.S. Senate Banking Committee and other lawmakers want answers from Facebook about issues raised in the offering’s aftermath, according to The Hill newspaper.

    Why Greece Isn't Leaving the Eurozone YetSlate

    Associated Press

    Small Dairies Go Under as Milk Prices Sink Again

    PLAINFIELD, Vt. — The MacLaren brothers are third-generation dairy farmers, but they will likely be the last in their family.

    After working all their lives on the hillside farm in Vermont that their grandfather bought in 1939, rising to milk cows at 3 a.m., even in blizzards and sub-zero temperatures, they decided to call it quits, auctioning off their roughly 200 cows and equipment ranging from stalls and hoof trimmers to tractors and steel pails.

  • http://rodgermmitchell.wordpress.com Rodger Malcolm Mitchell

    What factors can result in a GDP revision for 2006? What data suddenly have emerged, that all this time have been hidden? And why were they hidden?

    Thoughts?

    Rodger Malcolm Mitchell

  • winstoncourt
  • John Curran

    Re: The 2006 to 2009 time span
    It was a typo that I just fixed. Thanks!

  • wisegrowth

    I think about those like Paul Krugman who advised that when it came to a stimulus doing too much was better than doing too little…
    Now we see that the recession was bigger than first calculated… this adds more support to those views that doing too much would have been better…

    It´s really interesting to see the difference between those like Paul Krugman and those who view things in a Chicago school style…

    Paul Krugman is turning out to be much more perceptive of the economic situation…

  • http://stephenpoo.wordpress.com stephenpoo

    yes Paul Krugman and guys like Robert Reich seem to have been on track all along but few seem to be listening.
    Having been in constuction related industry iv’e seen so many lose out on their better paying jobs.
    If you didn’t get a worthwhile colledge degree construction was a avenue available that provided a living wage. Its gone for now and there is no substitute out there.

  • napertrainer

    Can no one see the forest for the trees?

    People are becoming obsolete. This “recession” is simply the beginning of an accelerating trend toward automation that is increasing at an exponential rate. All this talk of economic stimulus and other fixes ignores the central issue of people being replaced by computers.

    I’m a small business owner who is not hiring because many former jobs can now be done with fewer people using computers. If I don’t continue to automate, I’ll lose out to my competitors. Unfortunately, we are reaching the point where no one will have money (jobs) to buy our products but we can’t hire and remain competitive.

    Don’t know what the answer is but I sure know what the problem is.

  • bt46n2

    People don’t even realize where the problem with the GDP was, the number was bad-the revisions were the killer. Smart money virtually stopped trading the last two days, I’ve documented all of this with a proprietary indicator that I used last week on my site to accurately predict 14/16 earnings reports, all my findings were published 1-2 days before the report . In my opinion, this is only possible because of the manipulation and leaks in the market -read and see for yourself http://www.trade-guild.net/2010/07/maybe-not-everything-is-leaked-in-its.html

  • http://rodgermmitchell.wordpress.com Rodger Malcolm Mitchell

    O.K., What factors can result in a GDP revision for 2007? What data suddenly have emerged, that all this time have been hidden? And why were they hidden?

    Rodger Malcolm Mitchell

  • http://rodgermmitchell.wordpress.com Rodger Malcolm Mitchell

    It’s not people who are becoming obsolete. It’s uneducated people who are becoming obsolete. The solution is education. See: Salary for attending school.

    Rodger Malcolm Mitchell

  • pneogy

    Do you really care about GDP revision in 2006 (if there was one)?

  • pneogy

    Sorry. Disregard my last comment.

  • pneogy

    I am not sure that the situation is quite as dire as suggested. But, there is no doubt that thirty years of supply side economics is beginning to bite the demand side in the rear.

  • http://napertrainer.wordpress.com napertrainer

    I respectfully disagree that it is merely a matter of education. In fact, I think it is the educated who have been most lulled into the false belief that their education will save them. It is indisputable that Moore’s law has been and remains uncanny in it’s predictions of the growth in computer abilities. Keep in mind that this growth is exponential. The first wave of automation did indeed mainly effect low wage jobs manned by the less educated. But ask the highly educated middle managers, engineers, programmers, etc. if that remains the case.
    But let us assume your argument is correct. Do you really believe that a 50 year old coal miner or assembly worker can be “educated” to earn a livable wage when his job is automated? More importantly, if this person cannot morph into the educated elite, who will continue to buy the newest widgets that the educated create? I hope you are right but I respectfully suggest your vision of education as the savior for are current structural unemployment is more wishful thinking than reality.

blog comments powered by Disqus