Experiments in soda taxes and pay walls: an update

A couple of weeks ago, I blogged about soda taxes, the subject of a story I had in the magazine. At the time, Time.com readers couldn’t see the story, thanks to our new (pay) wall. Well, as it turns out, we’re only hiding our magazine stories for two weeks, and then they’re going up on the web site in full form. So now, after much anticipation, you can read what I wrote here.

Since I reported that story, another notable study of soda taxes has come out, from the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Economic Research Service. The conclusion: hiking the price of sugar-sweetened soda, juice and sports drinks by 20% could cut the percentage of adult Americans who are overweight from 66.9% to 62.4%. More specifically:

This study estimated that a tax-induced 20-percent price increase on caloric sweetened beverages could cause an average reduction of 37 calories per day, or 3.8 pounds of body weight over a year, for adults and an average of 43 calories per day, or 4.5 pounds over a year, for children.  Given these reductions in calorie consumption, results show an estimated decline in adult overweight prevalence (66.9 to 62.4 percent) and obesity prevalence (33.4 to 30.4 percent), as well as the child at-risk-for-overweight prevalence (32.3 to 27.0 percent) and the overweight prevalence (16.6 to 13.7 percent). Actual impacts would depend on many factors, including how the tax is reflected in consumer prices and the competitive strategies of beverage manufacturers and food retailers.

One nice thing that this study does, which such studies don’t always do, is take into account what people will drink more of as they drink less sugar-sweetened soda. The USDA’s researchers used data from Nielsen Homescan panelists between 1998 and 2007, giving them insight into everything people bought at the grocery store. One conclusion: as the price of soda goes up, people are most likely to switch to bottled water. After water, they also drink more fruit and vegetable juice, and after juice, more milk. Interestingly, when the price of sugar-sweetened soda goes up, people also buy less diet soda. The researchers write, “the complimentary effect is possibly the result of a diverse set of preferences within a household for diet and nondiet sweetened beverages.”

Now, there is a downside to the approach used. Researchers only looked at grocery store purchases, and about half of the caloric sweetened beverages we drink, we drink away from home. At a fast food restaurant, the price of soda is often bundled with the price of a hamburger and fries. It is perfectly reasonable to believe that an increase in soda prices in such an environment would drive behavior differently.

Nonetheless, the researchers make one interesting point that holds no matter where people get their calories from: a large number of Americans are overweight or obese by just a few pounds. Even a small reduction in caloric intake—such as the one caused by driving up the price of soda—could change the weight classification for many people.

You can read the full study here (PDF). It includes some great charts and tables, including this one which shows where the added sugar in our diet tends to come from (click on the image to make it larger):

Related Topics: soda tax, Economy & Policy
  • Latest on Business

    Shannon Stapleton / Reuters

    Facebook, Wall Street Banks Sued Over Pre-IPO Financial Forecasts

    Just days after its controversial IPO, Facebook and its Wall Street bankers have been hit by shareholder lawsuits alleging that the social networking giant and its underwriters concealed the company’s decelerating revenue growth from investors. The lawsuits come amid a growing furor about whether Facebook’s banks selectively disclosed information that gave favored clients an unfair advantage over other investors. Top U.S. regulators have begun examining the IPO, and now the U.S. Senate Banking Committee and other lawmakers want answers from Facebook about issues raised in the offering’s aftermath, according to The Hill newspaper.

    Why Greece Isn't Leaving the Eurozone YetSlate

    Associated Press

    Small Dairies Go Under as Milk Prices Sink Again

    PLAINFIELD, Vt. — The MacLaren brothers are third-generation dairy farmers, but they will likely be the last in their family.

    After working all their lives on the hillside farm in Vermont that their grandfather bought in 1939, rising to milk cows at 3 a.m., even in blizzards and sub-zero temperatures, they decided to call it quits, auctioning off their roughly 200 cows and equipment ranging from stalls and hoof trimmers to tractors and steel pails.

  • deconstructiva

    Thanks, Barbara. Hang in there re: paywall; I don’t think THAT model will work over long run. Thanks to your “what people will drink more of” quote, some may tell you so let me be first. I’ve replaced sodas mostly with iced tea (even w/ fast food)… with a catch. Many bottled teas – Honest Tea is a major exception – use evil high fructose corn syrup, which is why I cut back on sodas. (Amazingly, pricey Whole Foods has best deals on HT in my area.) I drink less soda because of HFCS. Jones Soda uses only sugar (and it’s pricey …and really good) but it’s not really calorie-friendly. I make my own tea in batches, sweeten it with minimal sugar, add fruit or mint, and bottle it for daily use. What do YOU drink daily, Barbara?
    .
    As for tax itself, I’d rather see either corn subsidies for HFCS ended (and I wish to marry Scarlett Johansson too) or tax the HFCS directly (yeah, giving subsidies on one hand for HFCS and then taxing it later is not best option). Thanks for your thoughts, Barbara.

  • deconstructiva

    …and Barbara, this is OT but highly relevant to current woes. IIRC, your posts / loyal reader replies have mentioned job training before. A recent NYT article (linked here thru CNBC) shows that it doesn’t really work …just like we pondered here. Hopefully you and teammates (here or at swampland) can mine your sources and post more thoughts here or in dead-tree edition (if high sheriffs are reading, no paywall please).
    http://www.cnbc.com/id/38303349

  • http://rodgermmitchell.wordpress.com Rodger Malcolm Mitchell

    The question about reducing the caloric content of one food is not so much whether that food will be replaced by a similar, but lower-calorie food. There may be a fundamental calorie craving affecting the entire body, so that, for instance, switching from regular cola to diet cola merely may stimulate the body to desire more candy.

    The belief that nothing else will change, except the form of liquid ingested, may be naive.

    Rodger Malcolm Mitchell

  • http://stephenpoo.wordpress.com stephenpoo

    One thing for sure the soda companies are going to fight like hell to not lose those sales, it should be entertaining to watch.

  • http://erieangel.wordpress.com erieangel

    I’ve pretty much given up soda. At home, I drink iced tea, brewed in my kitchen and with minimal sugar. At work, its usually water. The only fast food I eat is Wendy’s and I usually get the value meal with milk instead of soda–it’s actually cheaper, too. Other restaurants, I have water, with a bit of lemon slice, its free, and compliments most meals quite well.

  • Barbara Kiviat

    Oh, they already are. But I don’t completely understand why. Pepsi and Coke own two huge bottled water brands (Dasani and Aquafina) and well as countless sorts of iced tea and juice (Minute Maid, Tropicana, Ocean Spray, Tazo, SoBe, Lipton, Smartwater, Odwalla, Hi-C, Nestea). Unless people switch to milk or tap water, they’d still capture much of the money people spend on beverages.

blog comments powered by Disqus