The End of the Jobs Recovery?

The economy lost 125,000 jobs in June. But that’s not the worst news contained in the economic report that came out on Friday about who’s working and who’s not. Here’s what we should be really worried about: American workers are losing faith in the economy faster than they have in 15 years.

In fact, the jobs numbers themselves are not really as bad as they appear. That’s because at least part of the drop was due to the fact that much of the work of people who knock on your door to make sure you live there is done. The Census bureau cut 225,000 temporary workers in June. Factor out the government completely and the private sector actually added 83,000 jobs. In fact, the unemployment rate even dropped in June to 9.5% from 9.7% the month before. Wow, this job loss is looking better and better. So does that mean we are out of the woods? Not even close.

But before you start to cheer consider this: The economy has to add 100,000 jobs a month just to keep up with population growth. And June is the month that new graduates flood the market looking for work. It’s likely that a good portion of the class of 2010 were told there is no room for them in the economy right now. What’s more, the government to calculates the unemployment rate based on the number of people looking for work, not just everyone who isn’t working. And the drop in the unemployment rate had more to do with the number of people looking than those that found work, which I find to be a very disturbing fact.

June’s decline in the civilian labor force of 652,000 was the sharpest one-month decline in 15 years in the Labor Department’s survey of households. Some people could be frustrated with their job searches, choosing to take time off or pursue other options like school. Some could be experiencing the end of their unemployment benefits, which required them to maintain an active job search. Whatever the cause, over the past two months almost one million people simply stopped looking for work.

One million people stopped looking for work. They gave up hope that they would find employment and decided the couch was a better option. Or took up some work that was off the books and I’m sure worse paid. Earlier in the week we saw a big drop in consumer confidence. But not spending is one thing. Not even going to look for work so you can start spending again is even worse. Combine these two things and you get the sense that Americans are giving up.

Remember the V-shaped recovery. Kiss that good-bye. Economists, it seems, are hitting the acceptance stage in the grief cycle. This is from Steven Blitz at Majestic Research (ht: WSJ’s Real Time Economics):

This is the economy we have, not the one we want. The one we want would be well along adding enough jobs to take in new entrants to the workforce and begin to cut into unemployment. Adding 83,000 private sector jobs, of which 20,500 are temporary positions, and losing 10,000 state and local government positions, is not the stuff of robust recovery but it also isn’t the makings of a double dip.

And with the market back down, and hiring slowing, even that may be a little too optimistic.

So where do we go from here? Increasingly, it looks like the stimulus we got so far is not going to be enough to pull us out of the recession or what ever you call the malaise we are in now. CNNMoney today makes the point that we are near the peak of the spending from last year’s stimulus bill and we still have plenty of recovery left to do.

This summer will be the peak of the $787 billion stimulus program in terms of creating jobs and pumping money into the economy. In fact, the Obama administration is calling it the Summer of Recovery because more than 30,000 miles of highways are being improved, more than 2,800 water projects have been started and 120,000 homes will be weatherized.

After that, it will be a downhill slide for stimulus even as the economy is expected to continue sputtering.

“It’s very hard to discern any impact,” said Brian Bethune, chief U.S. financial economist for IHS Global Insight.

That brings us to the big debate that economists have been having with growing intensity for the past few weeks. The two routes are more stimulus or austerity–namely cut everything, raise taxes, and hope that a falling fiscal deficit will make America look like a better investment and boosting the economy. Here’s the problem: Austerity almost never works. Heres what a UBS study had to say:

Indeed, some 30 debt-plagued nations since 1980 have tried to reduce their indebtedness through such austerity measures. In practically all cases, according to a study by financial giant UBS, the increase in national debt was only slowed, not reversed, by such policy pain.

So to those who look at the job report today and say more government spending is a waste of money, I say this: What other choice do we have?

Related Topics: jobs, Economy & Policy
  • Latest on Business

    Don Emmert / Getty Images

    Apple Now Worth More Than Microsoft, Google Combined

    How high can Apple soar? The tech juggernaut is closing in on $500 per share, a dramatic psychological threshold that underscores the company’s stunning performance over the last decade. How massive has Apple become? It’s now worth more by market capitalization than Google and Microsoft combined. The company’s latest stock price surge is being fueled by rumors that a new version of the iPad — the iPad 3 — will appear next month.

    Chipotle Is AppleSlate

    Photo-Illustration by Alexander Ho for TIME; Getty Images

    After Motorola Deal Approval, Can Google Hardware Be Far Behind?

    Now that federal regulators appear poised to approve Google’s $12.5 billion purchase of Motorola Mobility, speculation is mounting about what the Internet giant will do with its newly acquired assets. And what assets they are. Once the deal is formally approved — an announcement could come next week, according to multiple reports — Google will be in possession of some 17,000 patents related to mobile phone technology. And it will be well-situated to enter the hardware business, which could mean that consumers will soon see Google-branded phones and home entertainment devices.

  • http://stephenpoo.wordpress.com stephenpoo

    If you were a sub-contractor as many were in such fields as construction,( IRS 1099 forms made what would have been employees into cheap subs)you were self employed and didn’t pay unemployment so you were never counted.
    What happened to all those construction workers just to name one field?
    You got counted when you applied for unemployment, but if you were not eligable or ran it out your not counted. How many out there are the uncountables that third class of citizens?
    And because your not enrolled in unemployment, they like to say you stopped looking for work, maybe you stopped going to the unemployment office because they have the same list of jobs every day by the same employers who keep it posted for one reason or the other.
    A friend used my computer to apply online for a $8.00 an hour PT job delivering auto parts.After the long application process was finished he then was directed to a battery of 100 questions of which about 7 or 8 questions were asked repeatly in different ways. After all that its a Thanks we will call you.
    Its pretty demeaning out there.Best of luck to everyone!
    Looks like real trouble looming.

  • robinjoe

    The stimulus actually made things much worse. The gov’t didn’t actually have money to fund a stimulus, so they issued bonds. The banks had to buy those bonds which left them with less money to loan to businesses. So they have starved off the fuel for businesses to pull us out of the recession. The economy is doomed as is the US dollar. Argentina and pre-WWII Germany have shown the way and we are following. The next step after the fall will the US starting WWWIII.

  • http://rodgermmitchell.wordpress.com Rodger Malcolm Mitchell

    “The gov’t didn’t actually have money to fund a stimulus, so they issued bonds.”

    This is not even close to being correct. Then federal government not only has the unlimited ability to create money, but it does so without taxes and without borrowing.

    The government spends (I.e. creates money) by reaching in and crediting the bank accounts of its creditors. No borrowing or taxes involved. To keep an an accounting of how much money it has credited to those bank accounts, the government debits a column in its balance sheet. This column erroneously is titled “debt,” but in reality it should be titled “net money created.”
    .
    Contrary to popular intuition, the sale of T-bills (i.e. “borrowing”) does not increase the national “debt.” The government creates T-bills out of thin air. This does add to the so-called debt. But when it sells the T-bills, it receives dollars, which are subtracted from the debt. Other than interest, it’s a net wash.
    .
    The entire argument about federal “debt” is based on Anthropomorphic economic disease.

    Rodger Malcolm Mitchell

  • bacotawordpress

    I can’t see how austerity is going to help us at this point.

    On the other hand, Krugman claimed that the original stimulus was almost exactly 50% of what standard models said it should have been. Assuming he’s not just making that up… it seems like we should have more stimulus.

    But politically I doubt we will. Personally, although I’m employed and making a good salary, I’m more pessimistic about the future now than I was at the start of the crisis. The difference is that then I had faith that the (economist) folks at the top would not repeat the mistakes that brought us the great depression. But now, somehow, we seem to be circling to those same mistakes. It hasn’t happened yet, but I’m getting scared.

    I know that the cries for austerity from some on the right (or at least middle) are sincere but a large portion of those are based on the misconception that the US budget is somehow like a household budget, which it would be — if a household had a printing press.

    But some of the others had an active hand in turning the balanced budget of the 90′s into the debt-fest of the 2000′s. That is political cynicism at its worst if they don’t get their way they’ll use that to deny responsibility for the recession, and if they do get their way they’ll blame the pain it causes on the president. So it’s win-win for them and lose-lose for everybody else.

  • bacotawordpress

    I should clarify that the federal budget is like a household budget that has its own printing press and most of the money circulates between members of the household.

  • pseudo7intellectual

    Mr. Mitchell, may I ask- are you a Christian Scientist? is the current U.S. National Debt of $13.2 trillion a figment of our imagination? Do we taxpayers not pay interest on it? It’s unfortunate that we cannot create new money.

    And if the government has unlimited ability to create new money, then why does it tax us at all? And why is it necessary to sell more “debt” twice a week? And why so much concern about how these auctions come off.

  • http://rodgermmitchell.wordpress.com Rodger Malcolm Mitchell

    In answer to your three questions:
    1. NOYB.
    2. In a way, the “debt” is a figment of your imagination.
    3. We taxpayers do not pay interest on it.
    .
    Federal taxes neither are necessary nor are they used for federal spending. This became true in 1971.
    .
    It neither is necessary nor advisable to create and sell T-securities. The concern is misplaced. If you are interested in learning, see: summary. The whole discussion of federal “debt” is based on a fundamental misunderstanding of how the government is financed.
    .
    Rodger Malcolm Mitchell

  • qqi239

    Also, there is a not so funny side of this thing that the government unnecessary restricts contracting in the area where it will have positive impact – if one need a software developer contractor there are quite a few legal hoops to jump through in order to hire an independent contractor.

    So, the net result is a substantial number of jobs that otherwise would be staying in the US without unnecessary are moving to India, China, Russia etc.

  • qqi239

    I will second Rodger’s opinion:

    1. The biggest component of the “debt” is “market access fees” paid by foreign countries to get access to our market by keeping their currencies artificially low vs. US dollar.

    2. And the only thing we can do about it is to print so many dollars until no foreigner would lend us a cent. At the point our “debt” vs. GDP will be inflated out to pretty manageable level, and we will produce our own stuff right here because Chinese goods will be very expensive.

    And the funny thing is that this is will be unavoidable end result in, say, 20 years regardless on any actions taken in between.

blog comments powered by Disqus