A Bad Day for Stocks, A Good Day for Housing?

If you took even a glance at CNBC or yahoo finance or CNNMoney.com or where ever you go to check up on the market, you probably know that today was a bad day for stocks. The S&P 500 hit an 8-month low, and the Dow was down as much as 326 points at one point. It ended down only 268 and change. (Feel better. Behavioral economics at work.) Something you may have missed is that bonds, as they have been doing recently, rallied. The yield on the 10-year Treasury note fell below 3% for the first time since April 2009, ending at 2.97%.

Lower interest rates are good for lots of things. They make it easier to borrow money and should in theory boost the economy, though that hasn’t been happening lately. One of the things that people often think are a big beneficiary of low interest rates is housing prices. So this should be a good time to buy a house. Yes. Actually, no, according to Felix Salmon, the excellent blogger over at Reuters. He takes it a step farther and flips the classic argument. Salmon wonders that if interest rates and housing are so linked, is the fact that we are at a year and a half low on the 10-year bond actually bad for housing. If interest rates have no where to go but up, doesn’t that mean that housing prices have no where to go but down.

when was the last time that historically low mortgage rates signalled a good time to buy, in any country? In pretty much every such case, I think, prices have only gone up if rates have fallen lower still. But now we’re bumping along the zero lower bound, and the only way that mortgage rates are falling significantly from these levels is if we get another monster recession. Which certainly won’t help house prices.

I don’t know where housing prices are headed, but what I do know is this: Low interest rates don’t really signal very much about housing prices at all. Here’s why:

Early in his blog post, Salmon states this, and here’s where he heads down the wrong track:

The big picture, in terms of house prices and interest rates, is clear: prices go up when rates are falling, and they go down when rates are rising. That stands to reason: people buy what they can afford. When you’re selling your house you care about the headline price, but when you’re buying it you mostly care about how much money you’re going to have to spend each month in mortgage, taxes, and maintenance. If mortgage rates go up, the amount of mortgage you can get for any given monthly payment goes down, and so house prices have to come down lest they become out of reach.

It seems simple enough logic. But in fact it’s a little too simple. In reality, there is very little research that links housing prices to interest rates. I looked into that link a year and a half ago when the Treasury was proposing a plan to buy down mortgage rates to stimulate the housing market and found this out:

On another troubling note, some economist question whether the lower mortgage rates would even boost sales or home values. A 2006 study of mortgage rates and New York City housing prices going back to 1975 by Lucas Finco of Quadlet Consulting found no correlation between lower mortgage rates and higher housing prices, or vice versa. “The relationship between mortgage rates and home prices is pretty obscure,” says Jack Guttentag, a professor emeritus of finance at the Wharton School of Business.

James Hamilton, a professor of economics at the University of California, San Diego, says he used to think that lower mortgage rates were responsible for rising home sales in the first half of this decade, and for that reason he projected home prices would rebound in 2007. He now says rising home sales were the result of deterioration of lending standards and not lower mortgage rates. “I was wrong. The real story with home sales has to do with the availability of credit,” says Hamilton. “And credit is tight now.”

There’s a lot of factors that go into housing prices. Felix says the math of interest rates and housing prices gets disrupted during a housing bubble. But my question would be doesn’t the same math then disrupted during a housing collapse. No matter how affordable housing gets, people won’t buy in. The real answer is there is no math that links interest rates and housing. So think what you want about where housing prices are headed. There are a number of reasons–foreclosures, the job market, low expectations about housing market returns–to believe housing prices won’t pick up anytime soon. Low interest rates, and the threat of them going higher, though, are not one of them.

Related Topics: Economy & Policy
  • Latest on Business

    Shannon Stapleton / Reuters

    Facebook, Wall Street Banks Sued Over Pre-IPO Financial Forecasts

    Just days after its controversial IPO, Facebook and its Wall Street bankers have been hit by shareholder lawsuits alleging that the social networking giant and its underwriters concealed the company’s decelerating revenue growth from investors. The lawsuits come amid a growing furor about whether Facebook’s banks selectively disclosed information that gave favored clients an unfair advantage over other investors. Top U.S. regulators have begun examining the IPO, and now the U.S. Senate Banking Committee and other lawmakers want answers from Facebook about issues raised in the offering’s aftermath, according to The Hill newspaper.

    Why Greece Isn't Leaving the Eurozone YetSlate

    Associated Press

    Small Dairies Go Under as Milk Prices Sink Again

    PLAINFIELD, Vt. — The MacLaren brothers are third-generation dairy farmers, but they will likely be the last in their family.

    After working all their lives on the hillside farm in Vermont that their grandfather bought in 1939, rising to milk cows at 3 a.m., even in blizzards and sub-zero temperatures, they decided to call it quits, auctioning off their roughly 200 cows and equipment ranging from stalls and hoof trimmers to tractors and steel pails.

  • warrwim

    “James Hamilton, a professor of economics at the University of California, San Diego, says he used to think that lower mortgage rates were responsible for rising home sales in the first half of this decade, and for that reason he projected home prices would rebound in 2007. He now says rising home sales were the result of deterioration of lending standards and not lower mortgage rates.”

    Barry Ritholtz of Fusion IQ wrote earlier this week that the Fed’s prolonged, ultra-low short-term interest rates of the past decade upended the traditional long-term, fixed interest market and led directly to a credit bubble of lax lending standards which afforded a temporary “housing boom.”

    Following the 2000-03 DotCom crash, then Fed Chair Alan Greenspan brought Fed Funds rates down to ultra-low levels. Under 2% for 3 years, and at 1% for more than a year.

    “Rates this low – and for that long – were simply unprecedented. They wreaked havoc with the traditional fixed income market. Bond managers were forced to scramble for yield; they found it in investment grade, triple-A rated residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS). The higher yield was created by securitizing mortgages, using an unhealthy slug of riskier, sub-prime mortgages.”–Barry Ritholtz, A Closer Look at the Second Leg Down in Housing

  • bryanfromhouston

    Real quick- there was no housing bubble. The U.S., as it should be perfectly clear by now, experienced a credit bubble. Pure and simple. Easy credit lead to building more homes than were actually supportable with the available real liquidity. Therefore, we are currently in a liquidity trap and nobody wants to purchase a depreciating asset with a fixed note (even a variable-rate would be unattractive) in that type of economic market. People can be fooled once….what was it that W said? :-)

  • http://stephenpoo.wordpress.com stephenpoo

    I believe real unemployment or underemployment is somewhere over 20% and better. Put another 25% or more employed who feel uneasy about there jobs immediate future and you have really high numbers of people afraid to make the move or unable too. Then there is the gamble on which way the house values will go and with all that it doesn’t seem to matter now how cheap mortgage dollars are.
    In better times I’m sure low rates would be a stimulas to buy and as your artical pointed out easy qualification is gone.
    Question: If you had to wager a beer on it: when do you think this economy will fully recover?
    Soon,- a year maybe two-,or multiple years like 5-10?

  • http://bodyg.wordpress.com health,diet

    Stock market decline, not only our country’s decline, but the decline of our people, the state is no exception, this fall is our current most serious matter, and our life is very good, but a lot of people because of the stock market not the ideal result in ruin, this is a very big thing, all related to a person, including life, some people have to jump off because of failure, which is not pathetic?
    http://diethealth.weebly.com

  • waltwriston

    The biggest mistake people have made since the 70’s was that they used their house as a source of income, as opposed to say a home…you know a place where you live, raise a family etc… The term “housing” is thrown around just like any other commodity.

    It’s kind of weird that behavior economics was mentioned because most people that should be acting rationally as claimed by neoclassical economics aren’t, because they aren’t acting “as if” they knew that a linkage exist between treasury yields and interest rates on borrowing.

blog comments powered by Disqus