Housing starts sputter, but maybe that’s not all bad

The smaller-than-expected number of housing starts in May helped send the stock market lower this morning. This chart from Calculated Risk (which you can click on to make larger) puts things in perspective:

Yes, the expiration of the federal house-buying tax credit seems to have led the industry to pull back on home building. But overall we’re still in a pretty sideways-moving pattern. And you’ll notice in the chart that starts for multiple-family houses actually rose month-over-month. If the reason we want starts to go up is to keep home builders busy and their workers receiving paychecks, then that sort of building does the trick just as well as the construction of single-family homes.

Now, building permits are trending down, too, which implies home construction will continue to lag in coming months. Permits, though, are still above where they were a year ago. (You can read the full new residential construction report from the Census Bureau here.)

What does this mean in terms of the bigger housing picture? Well, less home building is certainly a drag on the economy—and at a time when we could really use some movement in the other direction. But with respect to houses specifically, there’s still an argument to be made that we’ve got enough to go around.

Last week, Morgan Housel over at the Motley Fool made that pitch with the following chart:

He writes:

Supply has come way down from its high, but this is largely because sales volumes have been juiced by a rush to beat the April expiration of the first-time buyers’ credit. The number will almost certainly spike next month. You shouldn’t be excited until supply falls below average for several months, showing vigorous demand on the part of buyers, and giving builders legitimate reason to build again.

More importantly, this chart doesn’t factor in so-called “shadow inventory,” which are primarily pseudo-bank-owned homes in the process of foreclosure that haven’t been brought to market. Bank of America (NYSE: BAC), for example, just disclosed that the foreclosure process has been taking an average of 13 to 14 months to complete. That creates a big backlog of homes that should be for sale, but aren’t.

So maybe we’re actually not in such a bad place with regard to the economics of the housing market. Perhaps fewer houses are still the right answer in terms of supply and demand. Of course, for the construction industry that does little good.

Related Topics: housing starts, Economy & Policy
  • Latest on Business

    Thomas Patterson / Statesman-Journal / AP

    The Bleak Unemployment Report: Is Europe to Blame?

    For the first time in almost a year, the unemployment rate rose to 8.2% in May as the economic recovery appeared to not only slow but almost completely stall. And it gets worse.

    The Jury Is Out on the EuroSlate

    Getty Images

    Smartphones of the Future: 6 Predictions

    Future mobile devices will change the way you do business–in ways you probably can’t even imagine. Here are a few predictions.

  • Ffred

    Perhaps too many construction jobs were misdirected into new housing in the first place. I have yet to see an adequate effort to maintain what’s already out there.

  • http://billdaviau.wordpress.com billdaviau

    America needs for the existing housing inventory to be much more energy efficient. We have most of our construction workers out of work because of weak demand for new homes. Seems like we have an available workforce and an urgent need.

  • deconstructiva

    Fun with wordplay – This chart from Calculated Risk (which you can click on to make larger) …so this means we can make the risk larger if we click? Isn’t the risk in the housing market big enough already? (sorry Barbara, I couldn’t resist)
    .
    Maybe the future for contractors and home builders will be in remodeling instead of expanding already too-big supply: restoring trashed foreclosed homes, downsizing (literally, shrink the homes), carve up mcmansions into condos, even get paid to tear down some homes and turn back into parks and moneymaking corn fields. Thoughts, Barbara? Thanks.

  • Barbara Kiviat

    A good point.

  • Barbara Kiviat

    I wrote a story about that! http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1924506,00.html
    -
    And apologies for the misplaced modifier.

  • deconstructiva

    Thanks, Barbara! Great article. There is an urban planning movement that addresses your thoughts at the end re: building urban features into outer communities. It’s called New Urbanism. Peter Katz wrote a 1994 book The New Urbanism that helped introduce these ideas. It’s still available at Amazon (for now, just looked).

  • bryanfromhouston

    Barbara,
    The sad reality is that the American economy is essentially dead in the water without knowing where the jobs are going to be created. It is much like a boat in the middle of the ocean with sails, a motor and fuel for the motor, but we (meaning everybody) have no idea where it needs to go. While everybody is screaming at the Captain (Obama) to steer us to shore, you’ve got the Democrats putting up sales to carry us whereever the wind blows and Republicans firing up the engines to power us against the direction of any wind. It is really sad. And meanwhile, the passengers sit up front in the sweltering heat just wondering what will give first….the engine, the sails or the steering rudder….at which point, we will really be out of control but no longer listless on the high seas of uncertainty…as we are carried on the high seas toward either a shoreline or rocks….as yet to be determined. I think this accurately captures our current situation.

  • http://senekaross.wordpress.com senekaross

    For surety it is not so bab, as it is just and anecdote…

    http://bit.ly/dxfiU2

blog comments powered by Disqus