Who will be the next China?

UPDATE: My colleague Austin Ramzy has written a story on this topic. You can read it here.

This morning the New York Times is the latest to ring in with an article about rising wages in China:

The salaries of factory workers in China are still low compared to those in the United States and Europe: the hourly wage in southern China is only about 75 cents an hour. But economists say wage increases here will eventually ripple through the global economy, driving up the prices of goods as diverse as T-shirts, sneakers, computer servers and smartphones.

“For a long time, China has been the anchor of global disinflation,” said Dong Tao, an economist at Credit Suisse, referring to how the two-decade-long shift to manufacturing in China helped many global companies lower costs and prices. “But this may be the beginning of the end of an era.”

This is not a new argument. More than four years ago, BusinessWeek published a story with the headline, “How Rising Wages Are Changing the Game In China.” But recent events, like salary hikes at suicide-prone Foxconn and strikes at Honda plants, are again putting the issue into the spotlight.

This is good news for workers in China, who have long been stuck between the rock of low wages and the hard place of increasing living costs. But could there be broader implications? Could this prompt the world’s corporations to start looking elsewhere for cheap labor?

A recent WSJ dispatch argues that the migration is already underway:

Taiwan Electronic and Electrical Manufacturers’ Association Vice President Luo Huai Jia said Monday the organization, which represents the interests of electronic manufacturers on the island, is encouraging Taiwanese electronics makers to build new facilities in cheaper Asian countries such as Vietnam, India, Indonesia and Malaysia because of rising wages in China.

In 2007, [Foxconn parent company] Hon Hai, which assembles iPods and iPhones for Apple, began to build a new production base in Vietnam to help mitigate rising labor costs in China. Hon Hai also has production facilities in inland China such as Wuhan in Hubei province and Langfang in Hebei province. Compal Electronics, which makes notebook PCs and other electronics for big brands like Hewlett-Packard and Dell, has already completed construction of a notebook manufacturing facility in Vietnam recently, says spokesman Chihming Chang, although mass production hasn’t yet started from the facility.

It’s true—some cheaper labor can be found elsewhere in Asia. But enough to supplant the labor force of a country with 1.3 billion people? I’m guessing not.

Which is why a lot of other articles of late have been bringing up the possibility that we’re going to soon start seeing the cost of our consumer goods rise. Really, that was inevitable. And as I’ve argued in the past, I don’t even think that it’s all that horrible.

Related Topics: cost of goods, wages in China, Economy & Policy
  • Latest on Business

    Thomas Patterson / Statesman-Journal / AP

    The Bleak Unemployment Report: Is Europe to Blame?

    For the first time in almost a year, the unemployment rate rose to 8.2% in May as the economic recovery appeared to not only slow but almost completely stall. And it gets worse.

    The Jury Is Out on the EuroSlate

    Getty Images

    Smartphones of the Future: 6 Predictions

    Future mobile devices will change the way you do business–in ways you probably can’t even imagine. Here are a few predictions.

  • deconstructiva

    Thanks for post + links, Barbara (was surprised by amt. of dust in NYT factory photo, safety concerns anyone?). I’ve pondered before (to Michael) about Walmart seeking cheaper goods and if Vietnam or Mexico can provide them then China is toast. Well, maybe not, but WMT is a huge buyer of Chinese goods, literally. Could they be a serious game changer if these goods are pricier?
    .
    That aside, do YOU see Chinese rising prices benefiting US (pun intended) thru more manufacturing jobs, given our destroyed job market? Can our depressed economy / prices + shipping costs make “Made in USA” compete again, or is the price gap too far apart? What are your thoughts / links, or do you have upcoming interviews / dead-tree stories along these lines? Thanks again.

  • tanboontee

    I believe it is too early for anyone to make such unlikely prediction, in fact more of a speculation than not.

    There are still millions of unemployed mainly from the rural areas waiting to jump on the opportunity to work in factories. The wages will gradually and proportionally increase with inflation. What broader implications could there be in the near future? (btt1943)

  • vbierschwale

    Instead of taking a short term view, why not look at the really big picture?

    But first lets state that Chris Ruffle in this article says that Vietnam and Cambodia will be next, which I find very distasteful when you consider that we may still have people missing in action over there and the last thing I’m willing to do is give those people money.

    http://keepamericaatwork.com/?p=8775

    Now lets look at what is really happening and why it will destroy the economy of every country in the World just as it is doing to China now.

    http://keepamericaatwork.com/?p=8640

    In a nutshell, every time wages go up, the country that they were going up in loses because the corporations will leapfrog to the next cheapest country, which elevates wages in the new country.

    This will continue until they eventually get back to America.

    Problem is, America will be a third world country by then and the damage will already have been done, thanks to the CEO’s of the American corporations that history will show are responsible for destroying the economy of the World, just to put more money in their pockets.

    Virgil
    http://www.KeepAmericaAtWork.com

  • waltinbama

    This is nothing new. I’ve been in the electronics industry over 20 years and it started with NAFTA allowing the exodus to Mexico, they raised their costs and now it moved to China, they are raising their costs but don’t worry, companies have already been looking at other countries to move their factories to cheaper labor areas. This will not stop til our govenment gets things fair, how about North American FAIR Trade Act?
    The trend of bean counters running businesses is mature and we are only numbers, there is no more loyalty to an area or community from corporations. We need the manufacturing jobs to be in the USA, period.
    Anyone who says different is either an investor or just not in tune with what’s going on in our country.
    I’m going to sleep good knowing that we will be depending on Russia for getting our people to the spacelab when our heavy lifting capabilites are dumped. Can you say ransom? Price hiking? or just not safe? I better stop now before I get on a roll.

  • The Social Critic

    Forget the so-called Great Recession. Imagine losing 80 percent of your salary to help rebalance the world economy? Check out this newscast excerpt, as archived by LexisNexis News:

    November 11, 2010 regarding the G-20 meetings:

    STAN GRANT: With the world’s number one and two economies facing off, there are fears of a rise of protectionism, putting national interests above the world’s. The answer ultimately is cooperation, not conflict. For the U.S– .

    DONG TAO [economist for Credit Suisse]: The base for the U.S. to get the jobs of making shoes and socks back is long over. The U.S. salary needs to decrease by at least 80 percent before they become competitive.

    GRANT: For China–

    TAO: China should give its workers more salary increase, and that’s going to create domestic demand in China, and that’s where the global rebalancing should be coming from.

    Source:

    http://www6.lexisnexis.com/publisher/EndUser?Action=UserDisplayFullDocument&orgId=574&topicId=100007219&docId=l:1301745896&isRss=true

    Comment:

    We aren’t looking at a leveling of the economic playing field courtesy of the great equalizer that is globalism. If Tao is to be believed, Americans should anticipate a permanent lifestyle realignment — trading places.

    If the goal of globalization is to “raise all boats”, why is it that the United States of Titanic is about to sink? It would appear that trade liberalization was never a two-way street, and that the so-called currency war has been going on the entire time China has been building its economic prowess. Don’t forget that President Nixon invited them to the table, and the trend of overlooking their socialist bent and human rights violations has continued even as we fixated on Viet Nam, Cuba and other far more diminutive communist threats.

    That China has industrialized and is willing to compete is not the problem per se. The problem is that globalization has not delivered on its promise to provide equal (free market) opportunity to everyone. As long as human nature prevails, this so-called free market/neo-capitalist model is flawed by the very thing that makes it unworkable: An unwillingness to acknowledge that it cannot work as long as any party manipulates its tariffs and/or currency to gain an upper hand. Free trade isn’t free trade unless it is conducted in absolute perfection — entirely above board (which, apparently, is an unrealistic expectation that can only be dreamed up in the halls of ivory tower academia).

    That the US economy is on track for a permanent downswing after essentially serving as China’s opportunity driver all these years — that is no accident. Should China pose a threat, we have no one to blame but ourselves.

blog comments powered by Disqus