Is Gold about to Bust?

The consumer price index, which measures inflation, was out this morning and it was down slightly in April. Here’s what Calculated Risk had to say:

The disinflationary trend continues – and with all the slack in the system (especially the 9.9% unemployment rate), it is hard to see inflation picking up any time soon. The high unemployment rate and low measured inflation suggest the Fed will hold the Fed funds rate at the current level for some time.

That all makes sense to me. Here’s what doesn’t make sense to me.

Price of Gold Past Three Years

So gold did fall today based on the CPI number and the Producer Price Index, which was also down. But my question is why anyone would buy gold at this point, and therefore why gold hasn’t fallen more in price, given its three-year price run up.

Gold is traditionally an inflation hedge. But if there isn’t any inflation just what are investors hedging when they buy gold. David Von Drehle had some answers in a recent piece for TIME.

On survivalist blogs and websites with names like Guns, Grub and Gold, they have a term for what will happen next: TEOTWAWKI, which stands for “the end of the world as we know it.” When that time comes, along with freeze-dried food and water-purification tablets and plenty of ammo, a person is going to need some gold in his camouflage pockets. “Tangibles trump conceptuals” is among the key precepts of leading survivalist author and blogger J.W. Rawles. “Modern fiat currencies are generally accepted but have essentially no backing,” he explains. “Because they are largely a by-product of interest-bearing debt, modern currencies are destined to inflation” and ultimately “to collapse.” Rawles advises investing first in farmland, next in “useful hand tools” and finally in precious metals like gold.

Thus, as global finance has grown ever more complex, gold has become a badge of mistrust in the modern political economy. A stack of gold coins in your gun safe, as an online survivalist put it in an anonymous post, signals that you won’t be caught flat-footed when FEMA opens concentration camps, or when the U.N. imposes the new world order, or when terrorists wipe out the grid, or when the Mayan prophecy comes true, or when Israel attacks Iran and World War III ensues. Gold dealers have clearly figured this out; they advertise heavily on the radio talk shows of such doomsday-minded libertarians as George Noory, Glenn Beck, Alex Jones and G. Gordon Liddy.

The problem with that is that fear alone won’t drive prices for gold for long. Eventually that will get arbitraged out of the system, and the real (lower) price of gold will emerge. The problem is gold doesn’t have any really value. Not many industries use gold. And yes it is nice on jewelry, but there is more than enough gold to go around for necklaces. The real demand for gold comes from investors who are worried about losing their money elsewhere. And since there are a lot of worries right now, gold has been going up. But for me the fundamentals aren’t there.

A number of Wall Streeters seem to be coming to the same conclusion. Fortune has a story up today predicting the gold bust is gaining momentum, which was well-timed for today’s drop. Most of their argument has to do with supply. All these gold parties are contributing to a glut of the metal that will eventually be dumped by dealers. Here’s where some Wall Street analysts predicting where gold is headed:

Barclays Wealth in London predicts gold will fall to a fair value of $800 an ounce by 2012, as investors eventually dump it for riskier trades; Societe Generale, the French bank, in April 2009 predicted $800 gold by the end of 2010, though it has reversed its stance since then. Analyst John Nadler of gold deal Kitco predicts gold will fall to $900 in 2011.

That means gold is due to drop in price anywhere from 33% to 50% from a recent $1200 an ounce. Now that is something for the gold scardey cats should be scared about.

Related Topics: gold, inflation, investing, Economy & Policy
  • Latest on Business

    Thomas Patterson / Statesman-Journal / AP

    The Bleak Unemployment Report: Is Europe to Blame?

    For the first time in almost a year, the unemployment rate rose to 8.2% in May as the economic recovery appeared to not only slow but almost completely stall. And it gets worse.

    The Jury Is Out on the EuroSlate

    Getty Images

    Smartphones of the Future: 6 Predictions

    Future mobile devices will change the way you do business–in ways you probably can’t even imagine. Here are a few predictions.

  • http://stephenpoo.wordpress.com stephenpoo

    Interesting times, same old if everybodies buying it’s too late.
    I wonder if the survivlist stock up on the little mini gold coins. It would be embarrassing if you said I”ll buy your hog for forty bucks if you have change for an ounce”

  • seandougherty

    I provided a quick primer on how to play media coverage of rising gold prices on my business journalism blog, SeanReadsTheNews.typepad.com, last Friday. It includes reference to the Benner/Fortune article you mention, as well as “Dow 36,000″ and Glenn Beck. I was actually a little surprised it didn’t generate more traffic. Maybe I should have worked Sarah Palin in someplace.

    My post is here: http://seanreadsthenews.typepad.com/seanreadsthenews/2010/05/bws-steverman-on-a-gold-bubble.html

  • tupman

    French aristocrats went scornfully to the guillotine.
    But that is where they went.
    Gold’s detractors were scornful at $35 an ounce, at $100, at $500, and at $1000. They’ll be scornful at $1500, at $2500, but that is where it will go.
    As for those people and publications calling themselves economist, who may have had worthy social objectives, there was never a shred of evidence for their support of fiat money/ attack on gold.
    As economists, they are a disgrace.

  • bigkirb1

    I don’t remember any mainstream news outlet warning about me any other investment.

    Only with gold do we have all these supposedly people in the media trying to save us.

    I don’t remember them warning me about the tech, real estate, stocks, or bonds bubble.

    Time, like a lot of other media outlets have been given an order from the mega banks/federal reserve to put a smackdown on gold.

    Big US and UK banks have been selling a lot of “paper” gold with very little actual to back it up.

    And boohoo now they are mad that people are finding out what a bunch of first class criminals they are.

    Poor little Jamie Dimon and Blankfein are having a hard time, boo hoo. Keep playing games…

    Pure and simple, the elite not wanting us to protect what little wealth we have left even after raping the little guy without shame or remorse.

  • paganbarbarian

    bigkirb1 has a plausible theory. The income of the news entertainment media is totally dependent on them saying whatever their advertisers tell them to say.

    As everyone in the world knows, the reason gold keeps going up is because the Chinese must buy gold and they have no choice, no matter how high the price goes. They’ve said so themselves, and the news media mouthpieces just figure we’re too dumb to remember. The Chinese are stuck with hundred of billions of US securities, and they’ve got to get rid of them somehow. Number one, no nation can afford to remain tied to one other nation with any rope for long, and number two, the future value of US securities is uncertain. However, the Chinese government must sell US securites and buy gold very slowly, and very, very quietly, as invisibly as possible.

    Thus, as everyone in the world knows, the Chinese are selling US currency, and buying gold, and they cannot stop doing so. They must have access to liquidity, and gold is the best game in town. I suspect the Chinese are also buying silver, since the price has been steadily rising for a while now. They would be foolish to not buy silver, and the technocrats of the Chinese central government are not fools.

  • http://stephenpoo.wordpress.com stephenpoo

    I don’t remember the year exactly maybe 1979 or so gold was maybe 300 and went up to 900.
    If you bought at nine hundred you had to wait some 30 years to be able to break even with the original price,
    Don’t even take inflation into account.
    There should be something better out there, look around for it.

  • volkerh

    Not sure that china “has” to buy: http://www.businessinsider.com/china-in-the-end-didnt-buy-gold-from-the-imf-because-it-has-better-ways-to-use-its-money-2010-3

    Also, I mean, why should it? What vaue does gold have?

    Ok, in the middle ages it was useful for making coins out of but all those total breakdown fans seem to forget that without a cash based economy you have no need for gold either.

blog comments powered by Disqus