One more infuriating airline fee: a charge for carry-on bags

In its seemingly unending quest to tick off as many of its customers as often as possible, the airline industry has added another chapter: Spirit Air announced it will charge passengers for CARRY-ON bags. You get the first one on board for free, assuming it fits under the seat in front of you. The fee for the second will be as high as $45 if you just show up with it at the airport with your rolling bag thinking you can walk on the plane with it. The price is cheaper ($30) if you register it online or call ahead. The airline’s explanation is simple: Bring less. Pay less. Deal with it.

This is either brilliantly counterintuitive or flat out infuriating. Me, I’m with Spirit on this one. You? Here’s why. Boarding an airliner today is no more difficult than trying to get to a seat on a crowded bus while a moving company simultaneously carts the contents of three apartment buildings through the same space. By trying to beat the current charges for checking their bags, people lug ridiculously large bags on board.  Seemingly this works for the airlines because they need fewer personnel to handle (or lose) bags.

The carry-on-everything approach  sure doesn’t work for me. It’s infuriating: the overhead space often gets used up before you get to your seat, meaning that you’ve got to rush the gateway as soon as the flight is called to make sure you grab some. It’s dangerous: you risk getting whacked by stuff being dragged past you by frazzled travelers or getting beaned when the overloaded overhead bins are opened. It’s slow: how often have you waited as the last couple of passengers to board play seek-and-hide with their  carry-ons. Don’t you want to just throw them off the jet? Don’t you hate it when it’s you?

By charging passengers for bringing second and third bags on board, Spirit will discourage the human camels. And that’s great. It will make the flight just a little less aggravating. But it’s also a defacto fare increase, since there are very few passengers who can travel with one bag, be it carry-on or not. Even minimalist pros generally need one bag for their work/laptops, one for clothing. Leisure travelers tend to bring way too much—particularly on their way back from vacations. Adults traveling with children are pack animals—they carry everything. They have to be to keep the kiddies moving, happy, and not otherwise wailing in aisle 8.  So we’re all going to have to pay up. “The real question is will other airlines follow, and will this actually be good for air travel?”  asks George Hobica, president of the website Airfarewatchdog. “Planes will load faster if people don’t bring carry-ons on board. The other question, says Hobica,  is “when will more shoes drop?” Surely, pay toilets are on the horizon— credit cards accepted.

Related Topics: airlines, travel, Companies & Industries
  • Latest on Business

    Associated Press

    Small Dairies Go Under as Milk Prices Sink Again

    PLAINFIELD, Vt. — The MacLaren brothers are third-generation dairy farmers, but they will likely be the last in their family.

    After working all their lives on the hillside farm in Vermont that their grandfather bought in 1939, rising to milk cows at 3 a.m., even in blizzards and sub-zero temperatures, they decided to call it quits, auctioning off their roughly 200 cows and equipment ranging from stalls and hoof trimmers to tractors and steel pails.

    Why Greece Isn't Leaving the Eurozone YetSlate

    Getty Images

    The Term “Pink Collar” Is Silly And Outdated — Let’s Retire It

    You can’t throw a stone around the internet today (if that’s even possible?) without running into the New York Times’ new study on so-called “pink-collar jobs.” The report found that over the last decade more and more men have flocked to traditionally female-dominated career fields like nursing and teaching. Fascinatingly, the study disproves the commonly held belief that this transition is the result of the recession, proving that men’s migration into the pink isn’t out of some alleged desperation. Men want those jobs.

  • http://www.simonvinkenoog.nl/beeld/Yogi%20-%20Annelies%20Rigter.jpg yogi

    I’m not familar with Spirit Air, do they charge for checked bags? If they do charge for checked bags, then yeah, they’re a bunch of @ssholes. Other wise I’m all for charging for carry-on bags and not checked for the reasons you list above.

  • dotybj

    All the problems you mentioned with carry-ons are unintended consequences of the charges on checked bags. What will be the unintended consequences of these new carry-on charges? Why not just charge based on the TOTAL amount of baggage (by volume and/or weight)?

  • http://kewinters.wordpress.com kewinters

    Interestingly enough, their new checked baggage fees for the first bag are $5 less than the charge for carry-on baggage. http://www.spiritair.com/Policiesbags.aspx#BaggageFees

  • ficheye

    How about sending your bags ahead UPS? It’s annoying to see all the unnecessary things people take with them on trips. And doubly annoying to deal with people on airplanes in general. It brings out the worst in our already self centered, narcissistic society. Charge for carry on unless it can fit under your seat or on your lap.

  • Martha Stewardess

    What’s next? A fee for big pockets? “Sir, your overcoat has over-sized pockets. There’s a fee for that.”

    Or an extra fee for carrying your own bag of fast food? How bout that?

  • http://riverfknowledge.wordpress.com RiverfKnowledge

    Thnks dear for such a nice info. . .but do you know how to get best day to buy airline tickets if no. . then visit this:- best day to buy airline tickets

blog comments powered by Disqus