Is Inflation Coming Back?

Most students of the economy are focusing on the Fed’s planned wind down of monetary support,  and that awful swamp known as the housing market. But increasingly I’m seeing smart souls question something that’s been off the table for a few years: inflation. Talking about inflation now is a bit like discussing fur fashions in August, but as the economy gets further from the recession it’s a natural thing to begin watching. Also, the new focus on inflation is not so much a concern about the runaway price increases, the kind that would occur if the Fed chose to monetize the debt, but more of an expectation for low-grade inflation, the kind that props up corporate profits, adds a bit of oomph to retiree income from CDs and money funds, and generally puts an end to all that banter about disinflation.

Richard Berner, the chief economist at Morgan Stanley, is out with a report entitled The Return of Pricing Power. That’s the kind of headline that would make every CEO’s mouth water but it’s still too early in the game to know how big a boost we could see. Berner’s thesis is that the big drivers of disinflation—slack in housing and labor markets— are peaking, and combined with business cutbacks in capacity the ability to push through price increases will grow. He sees core inflation (ex. food and energy) rising near 2% in 2011 (In February 2010, the core inflation rate was just 1.3%.) There could also be a subtle shift in psychology. Here’s how Berner describes it: “A trough in operating rates or a peak in the jobless rate will trigger a change in direction in businesses’ and consumers’ outlook for the factors that drive inflation.  It may be reinforced by the fact that cyclically sensitive prices, like those for food and energy or other commodities, will rise in recovery.”  There are a few wild cards in this scenario, Berner notes, and housing is a big one. If there’s another rush of foreclosures and another move down in home prices and rents, the inflation outlook would be far modest.

David Bianco, chief equity strategist at Merrill Lynch, is also musing about inflation possibilities, though he sees too much slack in the labor markets for there to be a contagion effect where commodity price gains feed through to inflationary wage demands. Without rising unit labor costs, he says, a rising CPI is just shifting pricing power from consumers to producers (think corporate profits). Bianco also notes that commodity price run ups do not tend to wreak havoc in the bond market the way widespread inflation does, unless, of course, inflation expectations drive up real interest rates. Consider that another wild card.

The bottom line is that inflation is back on the radar but it’s going to be a different kind than many of us remember. We may see it in energy prices, food prices, a slightly richer yield from money funds and perkier corporate profits.  But we won’t likely see it in paychecks. If you’re sitting in the C-Suite that probably sounds pretty sweet. For everyone else it’s a mixed bag.


Related Topics: Economy & Policy
  • Latest on Business

    Associated Press

    Small Dairies Go Under as Milk Prices Sink Again

    PLAINFIELD, Vt. — The MacLaren brothers are third-generation dairy farmers, but they will likely be the last in their family.

    After working all their lives on the hillside farm in Vermont that their grandfather bought in 1939, rising to milk cows at 3 a.m., even in blizzards and sub-zero temperatures, they decided to call it quits, auctioning off their roughly 200 cows and equipment ranging from stalls and hoof trimmers to tractors and steel pails.

    Why Greece Isn't Leaving the Eurozone YetSlate

    Getty Images

    The Term “Pink Collar” Is Silly And Outdated — Let’s Retire It

    You can’t throw a stone around the internet today (if that’s even possible?) without running into the New York Times’ new study on so-called “pink-collar jobs.” The report found that over the last decade more and more men have flocked to traditionally female-dominated career fields like nursing and teaching. Fascinatingly, the study disproves the commonly held belief that this transition is the result of the recession, proving that men’s migration into the pink isn’t out of some alleged desperation. Men want those jobs.

  • pneogy

    “…the new focus on inflation is not so much a concern about the runaway price increases, the kind that would occur if the Fed chose to monetize the debt, but more of an expectation for low-grade inflation, the kind that props up corporate profits, adds a bit of oomph to retiree income from CDs and money funds, and generally puts an end to all that banter about disinflation.”

    And this kind of inflation has been off the table for a few years? As far as I can tell only 2009 meets your criteria.

  • http://will110256.wordpress.com will110256

    So in other words the rich (corporations) will get richer and the poor (workers) will get poorer.

  • http://rodgermmitchell.wordpress.com Rodger Malcolm Mitchell

    Economics is like meteorology — data rich and prediction poor. All the data about spending, deficits, taxes, money supply, dollar strength, etc., etc., is non-predictive of inflation. For the past 40 years only one piece of data has been predictive of inflation: oil prices.

    Oil prices now are rising, and if they continue to do so, we will have inflation. Period.

    Controlling oil prices and/or controlling interest rates are the federal government two viable options for controlling inflation.

    Rodger Malcolm Mitchell

  • http://howwethink.wordpress.com howwethink

    This is definitely a controversial topic.

    We don’t believe it is the free trade policy or the open market that boosted the korean economy during the recent economic crisis.

    One should read the article

    Korea, Not a Paradigm for Free Trade Economic Success

    at

    http://www.howwethinkproject.com/

  • http://howwethink.wordpress.com howwethink

    sorry….wrong post

  • waltwriston

    This seemed to work for Volcker to quell inflation that built up in the 70′s, though it did create the worst recession since the depression.

    http://research.stlouisfed.org/conferences/smallconf/lindsey.pdf

  • economicsfordemocrats

    “Inflation is good. Excess inflation is bad” This is one of my principles in Progressive Economics. We need to improve on our economic vocabulary. The infusion of new money by the central banks or any human system can not be perfect. This imperfection can cause deflation or inflation. Inflation is and has been a far better economic environment than deflation which usuallly leads to recessions/depressions and human hardships. It is excess or hyperinfaltion that causes macroeconomic problems by destroying the currency to quickly. I point to Professor Ha-Joon Chaing research depicting better GNP during high inflation rather than lower inflation periods. His book is “Bad Samaritans”.
    The current excess monetary creation is sitting in the banks. It is hard to create excess inflation when it is just sitting there. In fact it is hard to create a growing economy when it is jsut sitting there!! The answer is a more diversified monetary system! I direct you to the American Monetary Institute and my website http://www.progressiveconomics.com and “The Monetary Soultion”.
    Mark S. Pash, CFP

  • tom0bedlam

    I’m surprised that middle class types think inflation is bad, when they stand to profit significantly from it. Their wages increase, but their debts remain fixed. There is no effect on the poor, as their wages and expenses rise together. The real effect is on the rich, where inflation is a secret, not passed by congress, not collected by the IRS, tax on financial assets.

    This is how LBJ paid for the Vietnam war. With 14% inflation, the national debt shrank at 14% a year. It was cheap, quick, easy, required no act of congress and it was a very progressive tax, as it affected only the wealthy. And it’s the ONLY way out of the $3 trillion Bush war debt and the $2 trillion Medicare/ Social Security mess.

    When will the Democrats discover this? (the Republicans won’t inflate because of their interest in the welfare of the wealthy.)

  • ps56penn62pr64

    Inflation is inherent in any debt based monetary system that creates money out of nothing without creating commensurate real world value. The price measure in human effort or physical resource does not increase, but the purchasing power of debt-currency constantly decreases in the normal operation of the system as money is written into existence by a central bank or created by banks using fractional reserve lending procedures. Stable currency is not possible in the Federal Reserve banking system.

    The basic concept of fractional reserve lending is inflationary. The concept of lending and re-lending the same money, simultaneously crediting it to several accounts, increasing the number of dollars by some reserve ratio, diluting the buying power of the original deposit, devaluing the currency in general is robbing people of the value of their money. The process was well illustrated In a recent issue of Time Magazine (January 4, 2010), showing an initial deposit of $100, generating a total sum of $1000 with just $100 held in reserve, a 1:9 reserve to a new money ratio. When the buy power of the original $100 is distributed over $1000, does the process result in currency devaluation or price inflation?

  • tingjust

    This article is very interesting. Thank you very much for sharing .
    Hulu Downloader

blog comments powered by Disqus