How to drive down health-care costs: treat people like dogs

There’s a piece by a veterinarian in the current issue of Newsweek that makes the case for structuring the human health-care system more like the one we have for animals. That doesn’t sound like a completely ridiculous idea to me.

Naturally, there are big differences. Very few animals are covered by health insurance. Veterinarians can’t get sued for millions of dollars when a patient dies. As attached as we are to our Fidos and Fluffies, we can still go down to the animal shelter and pick out a replacement.

But there are lessons to learn. Including this one:

While pet insurance exists, only roughly 3 percent of owners carry it; even then, clients pay a substantial portion of costs themselves. That means they usually want to know the rationale behind each test. I explain what I think is going on, what I want to look for, and which tests I need to perform to find it. I rank the diagnostics from most to least essential and lay out approximate costs. My clients then choose what they want done, with an understanding of the relative importance, risk, and cost of each option. This step-by-step approach may seem time-consuming, but it dramatically reduces the number of expensive, unnecessary tests. And the process is more gratifying.

When facing the death of a loved one—human or animal—the real challenge is coming to grips with the reality of the situation. Since my approach draws me closer to families, it’s easier to suggest that the best course of treatment may be relieving pain rather than fighting a disease. Owners are less likely to fear that you’re giving up on their beloved pet if they trust you. When I’m asked about performing tests, and I know the results won’t change the outcome, I say so.

As you may recall, I’ve taken to talking about price tags for health care. Let people see what everything costs, and then have them decide what’s really worth paying for.

Behind that push for price transparency is a broader construct about individuals’ place in the health-care system. The thing I’m really talking about, which this veterinarian is too, is treating people like customers instead of like patients.

I am a huge fan of these videos, produced by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), which get at the fact that people rarely ask their doctors enough questions about what’s going on. I’m guessing that AHRQ cares more about patient safety than driving down health-care costs, but I don’t see why a new culture of patient-as-consumer couldn’t do both.

Related Topics: health care costs, price tags, veterinarians, Economy & Policy
  • Latest on Business

    Thomas Patterson / Statesman-Journal / AP

    The Bleak Unemployment Report: Is Europe to Blame?

    For the first time in almost a year, the unemployment rate rose to 8.2% in May as the economic recovery appeared to not only slow but almost completely stall. And it gets worse.

    The Jury Is Out on the EuroSlate

    Getty Images

    Smartphones of the Future: 6 Predictions

    Future mobile devices will change the way you do business–in ways you probably can’t even imagine. Here are a few predictions.

  • http://www.rodgermitchell.com Rodger Malcolm Mitchell

    “. . . clients pay a substantial portion of costs themselves . . .
    My clients then choose what they want done, with an understanding of the relative importance, risk, and cost of each option.”

    How does this help people who cannot afford to pay a substantial portion of costs, themsleves? Diagnosis + an operation + post operative care can run anywhere from $20,000 to $100,000 or far more. Is your suggestion, if people can’t afford it, let them suffer or die?

    By the way, the federal government can afford it.

    Rodger Malcolm Mitchell

  • waltwriston

    One day the US health-care system might realize that their days will be numbered by people who offshore their health-care to India and such places. After all the US has done this to the US workers expense to enrich their corporate coffers!

    So I say more power to medical-travels agencies’ and the employers who offer the option esp., if the insurance is reasonable per country to be covered in. A surgery, 5-star hotel, and a quick trip around a country for 20K sounds like quite the deal to me.

  • http://japan-russia.jimdo.com/freedom/?title=forex parakori

    The artist must bow to the monster of his own imagination.

  • waltwriston

    I realized that the US is more worried about losing GDP projections to their creditors than they are for the welfare for their citizens! This isn’t about equality it’s about liabilities and projections: smoke-and–mirrors. They’re scared to death of medical-tourism taking away from GDP: which with the exuberant cost of healthcare isn’t a net gain; it’s a net drain on society.

    Great article on the pros and cons of this.

    http://www.milliman.com/perspective/articles/rise-risks-medical-tourism-insight05-01-09.php

  • waltwriston

    Even better link on health care as a drain on GDP by the biggest accounting firm in the US (as far as I know). My question is why isn’t this bought up in the media? Dog insurance, is the topic.

    http://www.deloitte.com/view/en_US/us/Services/Financial-Advisory-Services/Forensic-Center/article/5e10e8e99defd110VgnVCM100000ba42f00aRCRD.htm

  • That Anonymous Dude

    I’d be curious to see how medical decision making differs when the decider is the patient and when the decider is not the patient, and probably would need to be a spouse/spouse thing, not a parent/child thing.

    I’d guess we have different mental decision maps when it’s ourselves vs others similar to our various other decision tree inconsistencies. I’d bet:
    1) people are generally more cost conscious on pets vs people in general (not for the pet isn’t as valued as a family member, tho possibly another element) because when you get a pet you know it’s likely to die before you.
    2) self vs other patient – our survival instinct is pretty strong. I bet it weighs cost very differently.

  • deconstructiva

    Could treating people like dogs be literally true? I think many medicines are shared both by pets and people …with different labels. Are the vet meds cheaper too?

  • deconstructiva

    (Barbara, OT but btw, I’m having trouble logging in this evening – have to re-enter password A LOT to get in, keeps getting rejected. It was fine earlier today. I hope it’s just a bug and no tech person is offended, kick people out, etc. I’m just letting you know for tech issue since I couldn’t find a tech support link or email address here to contact them directly. I could log into wordpress itself fine, it’s just here and at swampland. sorry about that)

  • tanboontee

    An old Chinese saying: In time of war, man’s life would be no better than dog. Is there a war in America?

    If the ultimate consequence of the health reform means eventually men would be treated like dogs, let it be. After all, pet dogs in the US live such luxurious life that they are envied by many people all over the world.
    (vzc43)

  • dtaupier

    I’m a little confused. Is the author suggesting that if grandma’s health care is too expensive, then we can put her to sleep? Wow! Shades of Soylent Green!

  • Barbara Kiviat

    That Anonymous Dude! So good to hear from you.

  • Barbara Kiviat

    I was on vacation. Just seeing this comment now. Are you still having this problem? I’ve sent a note to our tech folks.

blog comments powered by Disqus