Who does the jobless recovery hurt the most?

The stock market got very jittery in advance of this morning’s unemployment report, lining up with many economists’ expectations that the jobless rate would hold steady at 10% or tick upwards. Then it didn’t.

The unemployment rate, which has been hovering around 10% for the past three months, instead ticked down in January, to 9.7%. More meaningfully, broader measures of unemployment also fell. The Bureau of Labor Statistics’s “U-4″ unemployment rate, which takes into account discouraged workers, fell from 10.5% to 10.3%. And the “U-6″ series, which captures people marginally attached to the workforce including those working part-time even though they’d rather be working full-time, dropped from 17.3% to 16.5%. (All those numbers are seasonally adjusted.)

The good news, though, isn’t being spread around evenly.

Consider that the unemployment rate for most major worker groups–including adult men, teenagers, blacks and Hispanics–showed little change. The jobless rate really only fell for whites and women. The latter now accounts for 49.9% of the total non-farm workforce, compared to 48.8% at the beginning of the recession.

Furthermore, the number of people who have been without jobs for 27 weeks or more (the so-called long-term unemployed) continued to trend up in January. A full 6.3 million people now fall into this camp, an increase of 5 million workers since the recession began.

Various industries are also faring quite differently. In January sectors that added jobs included manufacturing (especially motor vehicles and parts), retail, the federal government, and temporary help. Temp jobs represented the largest gain in terms of  the raw number of people finding work. That’s typical for an economy coming out of a recession, although probably not the best case scenario for most job seekers.

The biggest shedder of jobs was the construction industry, with other losses coming from financial services, leisure and hospitality, state and local government, and courier and messenger services (which saw a whopping loss of 23,000 jobs).

Overall, a net 20,000 jobs were lost in January, which sounds a little odd since the unemployment rate dropped. Just keep in mind that this time last year we lost 779,000 jobs in a month. By that measure, we’re really doing fine.

Related Topics: Economy & Policy
  • Latest on Business

    LM Otero / AP

    Senate Approves Hike in Airline Security Fees

    (WASHINGTON) — A Democratic-controlled Senate panel Tuesday approved a $2.50 increase in airline security fees that would double the per-passenger fee for those taking nonstop flights.

    Why Greece Isn't Leaving the Eurozone YetSlate

    Associated Press

    Stocks Rally Further in Run-up to EU Summit

    MOSCOW — Global stocks enjoyed one of their best days in weeks on Tuesday ahead of a summit of European leaders that’s expected to be dominated by calls to boost economic growth.

    Europe remains the focus of attention across all financial markets in the run-up to the June 17 Greek election that could go a long way to determining the country’s membership of the euro as well as the future of the single currency zone.

  • deconstructiva

    Barbara, thanks for this and esp. for emphasizing the U-6 instead of U-3. Please keep doing this and maybe the rest of the media will catch up to the real unemplyment rate. Personally, the jobless “recovery” hits me hard: out of work and in the …construction / architecture / engineering field (thus time to write so many replies, yes?). While health care is better, many in construction are trying to chase that work and negating any advantage for any of us (I admitted my unemployment at swampland so there’s no grand confession here).
    .
    I can try to retrain for HC but will have to spend much time and money (upfront or borrowed, still gotta pay it back). However, after retraining, are jobs guaranteed? No! I’ve pondered (again, at swampland) how many people are in debt trying to retrain with uncertain job prospects ahead. Is retraining really working or not? I’ll bet banking is also hurting. FYI, here’s an 2009 article from Charlotte, NC hinting at 40% unemployment for architects there (glad I don’t live there, whew) – http://charlotte.bizjournals.com/charlotte/stories/2009/06/08/focus1.html
    Things will improve …but when? Thanks for your thoughts.

  • Barbara Kiviat

    @deconstructiva: Sorry to hear about the job situation—though we’re lucky to have all your comments! You raise a very good point about retraining. In the U.S. system, individuals bear the bulk of the risk when it comes to switching industries. I’ve been wondering recently if there might not be a better way, considering that the entire economy benefits by having a flexible workforce.

  • drew2745

    Barbara, I think the people that are hurting the most in a jobless recovery, are indeed the unemployed. Right now, many medium and long term unemployed people are fighting to get Congress to continue not just the unemployment extensions being tossed around, but also adding more weeks of benefits to those who are long term unemployed. I currently have been out of work for a year now, so I am classified as long-term unemployed. As a result, millions of people are going to fall off the unemployment rolls. News organizations like Time should be devoting some of their coverage as well on the people behind these unemployment figures, and what life for them is like hoping(?) that Congress looks out for their interests as well. The extensions doesn’t cover the EUC tier system, and thus the long-term unemployed folks like myself.

  • deconstructiva

    Thanks, Barbara. You’re right about finding a better way to retrain people. Spending more money on existing programs might not be enough.

blog comments powered by Disqus