It’s the savings, stupid

Remember when the economic crisis taught us the importance of saving some of our money for a rainy day? That’s a lesson the microfinance community is increasingly warming up to, too. I wrote a piece about the shift—emphasizing savings, not just lending—last summer, but I’m mentioning it again today because the Gates Foundation has announced that it will give $38 million in grants to organizations trying to figure out cost-efficient ways to drum up savings in poorer parts of the world.

Now, anyone who thinks that being poor is synonymous with not saving needs to read this book. Poor people do save and plan for the future—but cows aren’t a particularly liquid asset and an informal, community-based insurance scheme doesn’t work too well if catastrophe strikes an entire village.

The historical problem with expanding savings accounts within developing countries has been the cost of maintaining such accounts—since balances are low, it often doesn’t make good business sense. The Gates money is partly meant to help figure out ways to bring down costs by using technology such as mobile phones for deposit-taking.

And that’s where I think we all might learn something. Consider this recent study which found that people in the Philippines, Peru and Bolivia saved an average 6% more when they received cell-phone reminders about financial goals they’d already committed to. The economists who ran that study figured the process could easily be imported to places like the U.S. When those Gates-funded microfinanciers figure out how to get people in developing countries to save more cash money, I want to hear about it.

Barbara!

Related Topics: Gates Foundation, microfinance, microsavings, Wall Street & Markets
  • Latest on Business

    Are We Already Planting the Seeds of the Next Financial Crisis?

    Central banks are trying to revive weak economies by injecting large amounts of money. That policy helps in the short run, but easy money can also create the conditions for future booms and busts.

    Chipotle Is AppleSlate

    Getty Images

    Is the $25 Billion Foreclosure Settlement a Stealth Bank Bailout?

    Thursday’s $25 billion foreclosure settlement received praise from some consumer groups, but the reaction was not all positive. One detail of the deal that has raised questions and concerns is reports that the five major U.S. banks will get credit for principal reduction of mortgages they do not own. While the fine print of the plan has yet to be released, mortgage investors fear they will be forced to write down the value of their holdings.

  • ps56penn62pr64

    Remember when the economic crisis taught us the importance of saving some of our money for a rainy day?

    Saving money is not a simple issue, and I have some questions about it.

    Should I save my money at home by putting it under my mattress, or in a bank? If I put it in a bank, should I keep it in a safe deposit box or a savings account?

    Let me explore my options and their consequences.

    If I save my money at home, two negative factors must be considered: I run the risk of having it stolen and I remove it from general circulation, thereby depriving the economy of needed currency.

    If I save it in a bank, I have two options: a safe deposit box or a savings account. By putting my money in a safe deposit box I avoid the risk of having it stolen, but the money remains out of circulation and does not help the economy.

    What happens if I deposit my money in a savings account? The bank pays me interest on the deposit. They pay interest because they are borrowing my money and counting it as their own reserves. The bank then uses fractional reserve lending procedures to create up to nine dollars for every dollar I deposited. The buying power of every dollar of my original deposit is now spread over the new money the bank created. I have more dollars in my account because the bank paid me interest, but I lost buying power because the bank used my deposit to dilute the currency.

    Economists call that inflation, but it is really just a swindle.

  • tanboontee

    Absolutely right! Prudence is virtuous.

    It takes the economic crisis to hammer in such value into the mindset of the West.

    Well, better late than never.

  • jbauchet

    The Gates initiative is great.

    More evidence is also needed on the impact of savings. A paper by Pascaline Dupas and Jonathan Robinson came out recently about this. The authors opened savings account for randomly-selected microentrepreneurs in Kenya. Those who had the account opened and used it invested more and had higher expenditures. (The paper is a NBER working paper, but access to that part of NBER’s site is restricted. I am sure a pdf version is available on each author’s website.)

    The Gates foundation is actually also funding research on financial access in general, and savings in particular, so it’s going on the right direction (in addition to the Gates foundation’s website, check out the Financial Access Initiative and/or JPAL in MIT for more info on the type of research that is being done.)

blog comments powered by Disqus