The Great American Job Destruction isn’t over quite yet

The long-awaited end of the Great American Job Destruction of 2008 and 2009 did not arrive in December, as some forecasters hoped it might, as the Bureau of Labor Statistics reported another 85,000-job decline in nonfarm payroll employment this morning. The BLS did revise November’s payroll number, initially estimated at -11,000, up to +4,000—marking the first month of job gains since December 2007. But (a) +4,000 is statistically equivalent to no change at all and (b) they can always revise it back down again. In fact, there’s going to be a big “benchmark revision” of the payroll data next month that will change all the numbers going back to April 2008.

Beyond that, the general picture—of a job market that’s not exactly getting better, but has emerged from its free-fall and may start getting modestly better soon—isn’t changed much by this report. The unemployment rate, which is the product of a different survey than the payroll number, stayed steady at 10.0%. But the rest of the survey of 60,000 households that produced that steady unemployment rate was far less encouraging. It showed a 589,000-job drop in employment—adjusted for a seasonal factors, as are all the numbers cited in this post—in December; it was only because the number of people reported as “not in labor force” grew by 843,000 that the rate held steady. The broadest unemployment measure, U-6, which tries to account for those who want jobs but have been too discouraged to look lately, came in at 17.3% in December, up from 17.2% the month before. (The household survey results tend to be pretty volatile, which is why markets usually focus more on the payroll numbers.)

Construction and manufacturing led the way downward for the month, as they have for much of the past two years. Health care employment was up, as it has been for much of the past two years. Temporary employment was up by 47,000 jobs, which if you believe Dan Gross is a sign of good things to come, but if you believe this week’s BusinessWeek (sorry, Bloomberg BusinessWeek) cover story is just a sign of how good jobs with benefits are being replaced by crappy ones. Finally, government employment was down for the month, but that’s going to change big-time in the next few months as the feds gears up for the 2010 Census. So we can probably look forward to a run of positive job reports. But the big question is whether the gains will continue after the Census hiring is done.

Finally, since Ian Shepherdson at High Frequency Economics totally predicted this (he called for a 75,000-job drop in payroll employment, while the consensus among forecasters was for no change at all), I’ll give him the last word:

the underlying trend undoubtedly continues to improve and payrolls will be positive by Feb, not least because Census hiring will start to rise. But the core is improving too; manuf just -27K in Dec and trending towards stability; services down just 4K after a 62K gain in Nov; temp hiring soaring, up by 47K in Dec. Unemployment will be slow to fall though because people will come back into the labor force, and wages will keep slowing.

Related Topics: Economy & Policy
  • Latest on Business

    Getty Images

    Is the $25 Billion Foreclosure Settlement a Stealth Bank Bailout?

    Thursday’s $25 billion dollar foreclosure settlement received praise from some consumer groups, but the reaction was not all positive. One detail of the deal that has raised questions and concerns is reports that the five major U.S. banks will get credit for principal reduction of mortgages they do not own. While the fine print of the plan has yet to be released, mortgage investors fear they will be forced to write down the value of their holdings.

    Chipotle Is AppleSlate

    Chip Somodevilla / Getty Images

    Lawmaker Who Bet Against Markets Faces Insider Trading Probe

    A powerful member of Congress is under investigation for possible insider-trading violations, following a series of reports detailing how lawmakers benefit from high-level information they receive during the course of their jobs. Rep. Spencer Bachus, an Alabama Republican, faces an inquiry by the Office of Congressional Ethics over his trading activity, including bets he made against the financial markets at the height of the 2008 banking crisis, when he was receiving closed-door briefings from top officials describing the severity of the situation.

  • http://www.pledge-drive.com bondwooley

    For those unemployed, it’s time we put all that extra time into making the luxury items we used to go out and buy – like instant coffee:

    http://bit.ly/ozqT6

    (satire)

  • deconstructiva

    I’m still irked by most of the media reporting the lower “official” rate (the U-3?). Thanks for continuing to report the real U-6 rate. Does the BLS want us to believe unemployment doesn’t suck as bad, or do most media types wish to sugarcoat it?

  • http://swampland.blogs.time.com/2010/01/08/the-jobs-report/ The Jobs Report – Swampland – TIME.com

    [...] Trackback (0) • Related Topics: economyjobs Over at the Curious Capitalist, Justin Fox tells us: The long-awaited end of the Great American Job Destruction of 2008 and 2009 did not arrive in [...]

  • http://www.abnormalreturns.com/2010/01/friday-links-hedge-fund-letdown/ Friday links: hedge fund letdown Abnormal Returns

    [...] payrolls number indicative of a double-dip for the economy?  (Economix also Calculated Risk, Curious Capitalist, Bespoke, EconomPic [...]

  • judahbenhur

    December reflected seasonal hiring. This administration doesn’t understand that we no longer manufacture anything. We only make 5% of our clothes. Mr. Obama can’t force dictate the market with green jobs. Free markets need to be free. The government needs to create tax free zones and provide incentives that allow the market to work and innovate. I am not bullish on solar panels, but I am on natural gas. Mr. Obama needs to get out of the way.

  • tanboontee

    I never knew that negative numbers after “revision” (perhaps statistically) can change into positive numbers. That is real wonderful.

    Each time, the BLS, with interesting and smarter hindsight, would revise figures in the most encouraging and significant way. Can numbers be just manipulated that easily? What on earth is happening? Is there a new arithmetic to be learned?

    Little wonder the subprime crisis and all that followed were so damning.

  • dochosvet

    I was riding with an out of work plumber in the NW yesterday who is not expecting to get any work till late summer at best. There is so much excess office space and housing in our area that he says even high union numbers like him are out of work. My little business is just barely struggling along and not really keeping up with expenses this last year. He is opting not for “instant coffee” but taking his pack horse out more. Enjoy life while he can. Don’t get your hopes up for more jobs in this country. I do not need any gee-gaws or what ever else our citizens make now days. I am on a hard core retirement program even if not really retired.

  • http://www.riskey.cn/2010/01/friday-links-hedge-fund-letdown/ Friday links: hedge fund letdown | Financial engineering resource center

    [...] payrolls number indicative of a double-dip for the economy?  (Economix also Calculated Risk, Curious Capitalist, Bespoke, EconomPic [...]

  • Mike Licht

    When the media stop emphasizing the meaningless U3 unemployment figure, the government will use the more comprehensive U6 rate, now over 17% (as you report).

    See:

    http://notionscapital.wordpress.com/2010/01/08/23281/

  • http://curiouscapitalist.blogs.time.com/2010/01/09/weekend-video-just-add-tang/ Weekend video: Just add Tang – The Curious Capitalist – TIME.com

    [...] Submit a Comment • Trackback (0) • Related Topics: miscellany, Tang This was linked to in the comments Friday, and it made me [...]

blog comments powered by Disqus