Economy & Policy

Inflation hits landmark low, has nowhere to go but up

By Justin Fox | August 14, 2009 | +

The July inflation report, released this morning, will likely go down as something of a landmark: the Consumer Price Index fell 2.1% over the previous 12 months, the biggest year-over-year drop since 1950. This was entirely due to a 28.1% drop in energy prices over that period, and as energy prices began falling in August 2008, the year-over-year price drop will begin narrowing next month. Negative 2.1% will stand as the low point for inflation in this economic cycle.

Then what happens? The current inflation trend, as represented by the once-mocked but now obviously pretty useful “core” inflation number (which excludes food and energy) appears to be a little under 2%—year-over-year, core inflation was at 1.5% and over the past three months the annualized rate has been 1.7%.

Where’s inflation headed after that? I don’t think anyone has the faintest idea yet. A strong economic recovery and accompanying increase in the velocity of money (that is, all the cash the Federal Reserve has pumped into the financial system actually begins to circulate in the real economy) could result in a quick rise in the inflation rate. The economic data over the past few days, though, show that the strong-recovery story is still mostly just that, a story. Retail sales are down. Consumer sentiment is down. Industrial production is up a little, but mostly because of the temporary cash for clunkers boost to the auto industry. Jobless claims are up.

Still, on the inflation/deflation front, it certainly ain’t the early 1930s all over again. The year-over-year inflation rate quickly went from about zero to -4% in the months following the 1929 stock market crash, then fell below (rose above?) -9% in May 1931 and stayed there until April 1933. According to the Irving Fisher/Milton Friedman monetary explanation of the Great Depression, it was this extreme deflation that caused most of the era’s economic problems—because people who had taken out loans before prices (and wages) started collapsing couldn’t afford to pay them back, and this in turn led to a seemingly neverending banking crisis. Ben Bernanke does appear to have succeeded in keeping that from happening this time around

Related Topics: Economy & Policy

  • Latest on Business

    Don Emmert / Getty Images
    Apple February 10, 2012

    Apple Now Worth More Than Microsoft, Google Combined

    How high can Apple soar? The tech juggernaut is closing in on $500 per share, a dramatic psychological threshold that underscores the company’s stunning performance over the last decade. How massive has Apple become? It’s now worth more by market capitalization than Google and Microsoft combined. The company’s latest stock price surge is being fueled by rumors that a new version of the iPad — the iPad 3 — will appear next month.

    From our Partners

    Ben Bernanke Is Wrong About Debt and Interest RatesSlate

    Photo-Illustration by Alexander Ho for TIME; Getty Images
    Technology & Media February 10, 2012

    After Motorola Deal Approval, Can Google Hardware Be Far Behind?

    Now that federal regulators appear poised to approve Google’s $12.5 billion purchase of Motorola Mobility, speculation is mounting about what the Internet giant will do with its newly acquired assets. And what assets they are. Once the deal is formally approved — an announcement could come next week, according to multiple reports — Google will be in possession of some 17,000 patents related to mobile phone technology. And it will be well-situated to enter the hardware business, which could mean that consumers will soon see Google-branded phones and home entertainment devices.

  • http://www.abnormalreturns.com/2009/08/friday-links-vegas-bets-big/ Friday links: Vegas bets big Abnormal Returns

    [...] “Over the last 12 months, CPI has fallen 2.1 percent, the largest 12 month decline since 1950.”  (Calculated Risk also EconomPic Data, Curious Capitalist) [...]

  • curmudgeon57

    I suspect that the money the Fed is putting into the economy is going into the pockets of Wall Street bankers, and will never circulate into the “real” economy.
    -
    I’ve always had significant problems with the perception/reporting of overall versus core inflation rate. When the overall rate was high due to substantial increases in energy prices (now believed to be an artifact of energy traders), economists and economics writers bemoaned the onset of inflation, even though the core rate was low. When energy prices dropped, economists and economics writers noted that the core rate was still positive, indicating an onset of inflation.
    -
    Look it up in the archives; it’s true.

  • thantoni

    the way the term “velocity of money” is used in the second paragraph doesn’t reflect the proper macroeconomic definition. velocity can be estimated if we divide the total amount of cash money (monetary base) with the total amount of transactions in a given period of time. even though the banks lend the whole amount of money they were given by Fed this doesn’t entails the increase of transactions. In my opion the writter was refering to liquidity of money.

  • http://www.billshrink.com/blog/economic-recovery/ 10 Signs the Economy ‘Might’ Be Recovering

    [...] at the savings and wages of working Americans. While we may not be entirely out of the woods yet, TIME Magazine reports that July’s inflation report clocked it at negative 2.8%, which, “…will [...]

blog comments powered by Disqus