Massive job losses in pretty colors

Here they finally are. The monthly charts!

Great_Recession_last5

So this recession, while now clearly easing, is a lot worse than the last five. But you knew that. It’s the comparison with the Great Depression that remains interesting. Below is my comparison, compiled with help from Sebastian Dartevelle at Los Alamos National Laboratory, of job losses after employment peaked in 1929 and in 2007. The reason we had to tweak the straight numbers is that the payroll data cover only nonfarm employment, and nonfarm employment was a significantly smaller percentage of overall employment in the 1930s than it is today. So instead of just looking at the percentage decline in payroll employment, we look at the decline in payroll employment as a percentage of the total working-age population. The numbers (unlike those in the chart above) are not seasonally adjusted because I’ve not aware of any seasonally adjusted jobs data for the 1930s:

Great_Depression1It should be noted that this way of measuring things understates how bad things were in the Depression, because it assumes away the existence of agricultural job losses. Back then farming was still mostly a family affair, so presumably many farmers were able to keep living off the land even when demand for their products dried up. But it sure didn’t work out like that for the Joads. One of these days I should probably put together a straight percentage job-loss version again, just to compare. Not today. I do, however, have a chart comparing the job losses since last October with those beginning in October 1929. In both cases, October was the month where the real financial panic occurred. And when you start with the same month, it ceases to be a problem that the numbers aren’t seasonally adjusted:

Great_Recession2Not what I’d call a reassuring chart. In the 1930s, payroll job losses eventually passed 11% of the”labor-able” population. We’re currently at 3.35% since the beginning of this recession, so we’ve got an awfully long way to go before we get there—and every Wall Street economist and his brother sent out e-mails today declaring the current recession over. But just look at the chart: the trajectory so far isn’t all that different from that of the first months of the Great Depression.

Related Topics: Economy & Policy
  • Latest on Business

    LM Otero / AP

    Senate Approves Hike in Airline Security Fees

    (WASHINGTON) — A Democratic-controlled Senate panel Tuesday approved a $2.50 increase in airline security fees that would double the per-passenger fee for those taking nonstop flights.

    Why Greece Isn't Leaving the Eurozone YetSlate

    Associated Press

    Stocks Rally Further in Run-up to EU Summit

    MOSCOW — Global stocks enjoyed one of their best days in weeks on Tuesday ahead of a summit of European leaders that’s expected to be dominated by calls to boost economic growth.

    Europe remains the focus of attention across all financial markets in the run-up to the June 17 Greek election that could go a long way to determining the country’s membership of the euro as well as the future of the single currency zone.

  • pneogy

    Your charts do not include the just released July 2009 data, do they? If they did, the latest trend, if you believed the last piece of data, would be slightly less alarming.

  • http://twitter.com/justinmicklefox Justin Fox

    These most definitely do include July 2009. In the first chart, there’s something hinky with the numbering in the x-axis. In the other two, the issue is that, without the seasonal adjustments that brought us to minus 247,000, job losses totaled 1.3 million in July. And while I’m all for seasonal adjustments, I find that a bit disturbing.

  • http://www.butthenwhat.com/?p=5875 Great Recession Charts | But Then What

    [...] only “borrow’ one of his graphs, so check out Justin Fox’s blog at Time.com for some other great ones on the recession. Be sure and read the wonkish comments as [...]

  • tegwar

    hoepfully handy note: to get around the lack of seasonally adjusted data, you could calculate / present these numbers as % change from year ago. that way you’re comparing ‘septembers’ against ‘septembers’ and seasonal effects won’t matter. Not the same thing, but hopefully helpful.

  • http://WWW.STOCKTRADINGLINK.NET stock split

    stock split…

    Your topic MarxFoods.com Blog ” Blog Archive ” Why Use Whole Spices? was interesting when I found it on Sunday searching for stock split…

  • http://www.kontoranabayi.com kontorbayi

    Thanks you very good; thanks for add to your informations;
    http://www.kontoranabayi.com/

blog comments powered by Disqus