Netflix successfully crowdsources its R&D. Now what?

Almost three years ago, Netflix announced it would award $1 million to anyone who could improve its movie-recommendation algorithm by at least 10%. (That’s the computer programming that tells you that if you like Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind, chances are you’ll also like Kurosawa films—odd as that may sound.) Well, for the price of $1 million, Netflix now has itself a nifty new recommendations algorithm. Techcrunch details the last, hectic moments of the contest:

Who knew statistical computing competitions could be so cut throat? Since we reported on the contest last night, two teams in the Netflix Prize have spent the last few hours jumping back and forth on the Netflix leaderboard as the three-year-long competition ticked into its final moments, with last minute sniping submissions coming from both sides. Finally, the results are in: The Ensemble has managed to come from behind to upset BellKor’s Pragmatic Chaos with a top submission of 10.10% — an improvement of .01% — only 4 minutes before the contest closed.

It’s a big win for the idea of crowdsourcing—not a new concept, by any stretch of the imagination—but one that has captured a lot of attention in recent years. What’s the take-away?

Well, if you come up with an interesting enough problem and put a chunk of money on the table, the people in the world you most want solving your problem will come to you. The computer engineers who toiled away in the service of better movie recommendations hailed from around the world, and from some pretty top-notch institutions—places like the University of California-Berkeley and AT&T Research.

How widely that process can be replicated, though, is still a question-mark. In this recent paper, researchers at MIT summarize their results of studying 250 different examples of “collective intelligence”—from Wikipedia to the minor-league baseball team the Schaumburg Flyers. The conclusion: many, many circumstances have to line up in order to get these sorts of projects to work. Everything from sources of motivation (monetary and otherwise) to how the task does or doesn’t break down into smaller parts.

Bounce around the Internet and you’ll quickly see that the sorts of things Netflix customers care most about are improving the company’s online streaming technology and getting its full roster of movies-by-mail onto its Web site. Those two tasks—which seem to be 1) a fairly run-of-the-mill programming issue; and 2) a problem for copyright lawyers—might not be the stuff of Netflix Prize II. It’s a rare business need that’s flashy enough to warrant three years and $1 million.

Barbara!

Related Topics: Technology & Media
  • Latest on Business

    Don Emmert / Getty Images

    Apple Now Worth More Than Microsoft, Google Combined

    How high can Apple soar? The tech juggernaut is closing in on $500 per share, a dramatic psychological threshold that underscores the company’s stunning performance over the last decade. How massive has Apple become? It’s now worth more by market capitalization than Google and Microsoft combined. The company’s latest stock price surge is being fueled by rumors that a new version of the iPad — the iPad 3 — will appear next month.

    Chipotle Is AppleSlate

    Photo-Illustration by Alexander Ho for TIME; Getty Images

    After Motorola Deal Approval, Can Google Hardware Be Far Behind?

    Now that federal regulators appear poised to approve Google’s $12.5 billion purchase of Motorola Mobility, speculation is mounting about what the Internet giant will do with its newly acquired assets. And what assets they are. Once the deal is formally approved — an announcement could come next week, according to multiple reports — Google will be in possession of some 17,000 patents related to mobile phone technology. And it will be well-situated to enter the hardware business, which could mean that consumers will soon see Google-branded phones and home entertainment devices.

  • curmudgeon57

    This is the entire business model of software consultancy TopCoder (I have no affiliation). They hold coding competitions that are based on projects they have or expect to have, or components they believe will contribute to their IP. But you’re right, it does require the ability to decompose a problem carefully.

  • Barbara Kiviat

    It also seems to work for InnoCentive:
    http://www.innocentive.com/

blog comments powered by Disqus