Caught in a credit crunch? Try borrowing from yourself

Well, the President signed those new credit-card regulations into law today. Now we wait and see if card companies start pulling back on credit lines and perks like we’ve been told they might. If that does happen, one option you might consider is borrowing against your 401(k). What 401(k)? you might be asking. Fair enough. But if there is any there there, think about it. According to a paper put out today by Fed economists Geng Li and Paul Smith, we don’t borrow from ourselves nearly enough. I quote:

[M]any 401(k)-loan-eligible households carry relatively expensive consumer debt that could be more economically financed via 401(k) borrowing. In the aggregate, we estimate that such households could have saved as much as $5 billion in 2007 by shifting expensive consumer debt to 401(k) loans. This would translate into annual savings of about $275 per household—roughly 20 percent of their overall interest costs—with larger reductions for households that carry consumer debt at high interest rates or who hold larger 401(k) balances.

We propose that this apparent puzzle—why households would not take the opportunity to reduce their interest costs by 20 percent or more—is an indication of either a willingness to pay to avoid the risks of 401(k) borrowing, or a common financial mistake. We posit  several reasons why households might choose to borrow less than expected from 401(k) plans. They may be rationally averse to the risk of losing their jobs and having to pay back the loan in a short time frame. They may be expecting higher 401(k) returns than the after-tax interest they’re paying on outside loans (or, at least, averse to the risk of such a scenario). They may rationally acknowledge self-control problems in spending by walling off 401(k)s in a separate mental account that is unavailable for current consumption. Alternatively, they may simply be making a mistake—for example, they may be confused about the potential advantages of 401(k) borrowing, or they may carry a credit card balance despite their intention to pay it off in full every month.

That last part sounds similar to something I’ve read before.

Barbara!

Related Topics: Economy & Policy
  • Latest on Business

    Getty Images

    Is the $25 Billion Foreclosure Settlement a Stealth Bank Bailout?

    Thursday’s $25 billion foreclosure settlement received praise from some consumer groups, but the reaction was not all positive. One detail of the deal that has raised questions and concerns is reports that the five major U.S. banks will get credit for principal reduction of mortgages they do not own. While the fine print of the plan has yet to be released, mortgage investors fear they will be forced to write down the value of their holdings.

    Chipotle Is AppleSlate

    Chip Somodevilla / Getty Images

    Lawmaker Who Bet Against Markets Faces Insider Trading Probe

    A powerful member of Congress is under investigation for possible insider-trading violations, following a series of reports detailing how lawmakers benefit from high-level information they receive during the course of their jobs. Rep. Spencer Bachus, an Alabama Republican, faces an inquiry by the Office of Congressional Ethics over his trading activity, including bets he made against the financial markets at the height of the 2008 banking crisis, when he was receiving closed-door briefings from top officials describing the severity of the situation.

  • curmudgeon57

    You may be able to justify this on a pure cost-benefit analysis, but it’s a really bad idea from just about any other point of view. I think there are some unstated assumptions here – that we carry a balance (42 percent of us do not, according to you – yes, I did read it), and that we completely pay it off at some point in time before we leave our job (when we are required to do so immediately). There may also be other assumptions they are making, but it’s not clear. This seems, well, grossly irresponsible coming from our government.

  • odograph

    We are imperfect economic beings. If “mental accounting” is a Behavioral Anomaly, use it in this case. Keep that money for the far future safe, and don’t break into it for anything that is not truly desperate.

    I think I remember that 24% of retirement accounts have loans against them, which is far too much. Especially if those poor guys borrowed against them when they were at the market top.

blog comments powered by Disqus