Pay cuts instead of layoffs: something insidious this way comes?

More and more companies are cutting worker pay. I wrote a story about that a few weeks ago for the Global Business section of our magazine. I started thinking about it again last week after hearing that EMC, which makes data storage hardware, is reducing tens of thousands of salaries by 5%. The forward march continues.

At first blush, this probably seems swell, since the alternative—ostensibly—is layoffs. Companies are spreading around the pain, refusing to toss employees out on the street. It’s all very touchy-feely. Well, maybe. When I wrote that story, I made sure to insert some skepticism (though maybe not enough), noting, for example, that in many cases these pay cuts are—or become—permanent. I remarked that I hoped the recession wasn’t just a convenient cover for companies that had been looking to trim labor costs anyway.

Since then, I’ve been e-mailing back and forth with a reader about pay cuts at HP. He sent me a link to this blog post and this video, which pretty clearly show that no, workers aren’t always happy when companies “save” jobs by reducing pay. In fact, sometimes workers wind up doing things like comparing senior management to Nazis (for the record: I am not personally making that comparison). Barry Diller has also had some harsh words for executives of companies that are profitable but nonetheless cutting back on labor costs—i.e., people’s livelihoods.

That’s not to say that pay cuts are necessarily insidious. When I was talking to Truman Bewley for my story, he recalled one company where the union was trumpeting the idea of pay cuts, but management refused, afraid they’d send the signal there wasn’t enough work to do, and that employees would adjust their enthusiasm and output accordingly.

But Bewley also pointed out that in many instances pay cuts aren’t really an alternative to layoffs—that when a company needs a smaller workforce it needs a smaller workforce. Normally, he said, pay cuts only preserve jobs if demand for what the company sells is very sensitive to price. By taking out a sliver of the cost of producing its goods or services, demand rebounds. In most other cases the notion that a pay cut saves a job just isn’t accurate, he said. Which gets me back to being suspicious of why so many companies are deciding now is the time for pay cuts.

Barbara!

Related Topics: Economy & Policy
  • Latest on Business

    Don Emmert / Getty Images

    Apple Now Worth More Than Microsoft, Google Combined

    How high can Apple soar? The tech juggernaut is closing in on $500 per share, a dramatic psychological threshold that underscores the company’s stunning performance over the last decade. How massive has Apple become? It’s now worth more by market capitalization than Google and Microsoft combined. The company’s latest stock price surge is being fueled by rumors that a new version of the iPad — the iPad 3 — will appear next month.

    Chipotle Is AppleSlate

    Photo-Illustration by Alexander Ho for TIME; Getty Images

    After Motorola Deal Approval, Can Google Hardware Be Far Behind?

    Now that federal regulators appear poised to approve Google’s $12.5 billion purchase of Motorola Mobility, speculation is mounting about what the Internet giant will do with its newly acquired assets. And what assets they are. Once the deal is formally approved — an announcement could come next week, according to multiple reports — Google will be in possession of some 17,000 patents related to mobile phone technology. And it will be well-situated to enter the hardware business, which could mean that consumers will soon see Google-branded phones and home entertainment devices.

  • j242

    Microsoft recently cut the pay of all contracted “a-” employees by 10% and dropped the amount they would pay for any future contracts by 15%. This is after posting a meager 4 billion dollar profit in the previous quarter, wasting 17.5 million to build a bridge between two sets of campus buildings (currently separated by the 520 highway but with two roads connecting them with only a mile between the overpasses), is building 6 new multi-million dollar buildings, laid off more than 5,000 full time employees and continues to waste money on failed programs like search and the Zune. This is corporate excess and greed at the expense of the people that make this company work…

  • seandougherty

    Are you also against workers using a strong job market to argue in favor of raises? Because I don’t see how you can be in favor of one side (employees) having and using market power and not the other.

  • j242

    To “Seandougherty”: If your response was to me, yes I am against that as well. Increased competition is good but when a company claims it’s costs are too high to continue paying a massive portion of it’s workforce the legally agreed upon rate they most certainly shouldn’t be blowing their cash reserves on frivolous projects which are not generating income. If an employee tries to demand a raise simply because the company is doing well, that’s ridiculous as it comes down to the individual deserving it or not. Poor employees should be cut, great employees should be rewarded. MS’s strategies to continue wasting money to get into the Search arena and to try and enter the PMP arena have failed, completely, utterly. They hold no chance of “winning” the battles they have picked there but keep funneling money into them while cutting groups that WERE profitable. That’s bad project management and bad business spending.

  • qqi239

    Next thing will be caps on college tuition and abolition of tenure – each and every University receives tons of government grants so the door is wide open.

  • Brew

    So, do you think Krugman is reading your blog? I do. :)
    Falling Wage Syndrome

  • Barbara Kiviat

    Reading… or ripping off?! Just kidding. Somehow Paul Krugman was able to move the ball much further than I was. Go figure.

  • mg572

    I see many companies making the decision to cut salaries — and we considered it at my company, too, but decided it was too demoralizing for our employees. We did have to layoff, but felt those we kept deserved to be fairly compensated for the work they were doing — if was was worth X yesterday, why all the sudden would it be worth X – 10% today? We polled a number of employees who at first thought it would be a good way to save jobs, but when they crunched the numbers realized it wouldn’t really help much.

  • j242

    mg572, all MS would have to do is refrain from their wholly unnecessary and wasteful spending for two or three “projects” and they wouldn’t need to layoff or reduce ANYONE’S wages… That’s my big problem, they tell the investors “Look how much money we just made in a bum economy!” all while bragging in local newspapers about all the temporary jobs one project or another will create (for construction firms) then tell their employees they don’t have enough and so they are violating their contracts and they can either take a pay cut or be fired…

    It’s offensive, insulting and downright wrong…

  • Brew

    @Barbara, How about you inspired him?

  • eugeneworker

    Datalogic announced Tuesday that it is eliminating about 20 percent of its Eugene work force, or 89 people, by shifting the manufacture of mobile barcode scanning devices to its facilities in Italy. The company will continue to employ about 50 people in nonmanufacturing positions with the mobile scanning division in Eugene.

    The company also will continue to employ 300 people in a separate Eugene division that develops and produces fixed scanners primarily for supermarkets.

    http://www.registerguard.com/csp/cms/sites/web/updates/13172488-55/story.csp

blog comments powered by Disqus