Debt for car companies, bad. Debt for banks, good!

One of the big constituencies involved in negotiating GM’s fate is, of course, GM bondholders. Last I read, GM was looking for its bondholders to turn in at least two-thirds of their debt in exchange for equity and new debt. Ford, that anomalously self-sufficient American car company, is reducing its debtload, too—buying back or retiring billions of dollars in bonds, with the goal of reducing its dependence on borrowed money by some 40%.

This attitude, you might have noticed, is very different than the one taken with respect to the financial industry. Just two weeks ago, the FDIC extended its debt-guarantee program, designed to make it easier for banks to issue debt to each other.

Now, this, I told myself at first, makes sense. Banks have a different business model than auto outfits. They need to be able to borrow money. As a leading business columnist recently wrote, if you start wiping out bondholders at financial firms, everyone will panic and there will be (even more of) a global credit collapse. At least that’s the fear.

I started to wonder exactly how dependent finance outfits are on borrowed money. It’s a rough gauge, to be sure, but at the end of last year, some 20% of the total liabilities and capital at FDIC-insured institutions came from non-deposit borrowing and subordinated debt. Seems like a lot. Then I went back and calculated what that percentage was at the end of 1993, the earliest year the FDIC has on its web site. The figure in 1993 was 14%. That’s just six percentage points of difference—but six percentage points spread over billions of dollars. So it is possible to survive with a lot less dependence on debt financing. Hm.

I’m now beginning to wonder if the car industry has a lesson to teach the finance industry. Debt financing is fun, but maybe now is the time to think long and hard about how much we want to actually do that and take the opportunity of an anything-goes economic environment to rejigger our balance sheets? Yes, the alternative for banks is deposit-taking—borrowed money of a different sort. But at least depositors tend to stick around in good times and bad. They rarely get together and start lobbying the Treasury Secretary for a seat at the table.

Barbara!

Related Topics: Economy & Policy
  • Latest on Business

    Chip Somodevilla / Getty Images

    Lawmaker Who Bet Against Markets Faces Insider Trading Probe

    A powerful member of Congress is under investigation for possible insider-trading violations, following a series of reports detailing how lawmakers benefit from high-level information they receive during the course of their jobs. Rep. Spencer Bachus, an Alabama Republican, faces an inquiry by the Office of Congressional Ethics over his trading activity, including bets he made against the financial markets at the height of the 2008 banking crisis, when he was receiving closed-door briefings from top officials describing the severity of the situation.

    Chipotle Is AppleSlate

    Don Emmert / Getty Images

    Apple Now Worth More Than Microsoft, Google Combined

    How high can Apple soar? The tech juggernaut is closing in on $500 per share, a dramatic psychological threshold that underscores the company’s stunning performance over the last decade. How massive has Apple become? It’s now worth more by market capitalization than Google and Microsoft combined. The company’s latest stock price surge is being fueled by rumors that a new version of the iPad — the iPad 3 — will appear next month.

  • http://www.124monkeys.com Sean DeCoursey forgot his password

    Less debt = lower profit margins.
    -
    Lower profit margins = smaller bonuses.
    -
    How do you think the financial industry feels about reducing their debt load?

  • tc125231

    I was wondering when anyone in the financial press would notice the radically different treatment of Wall Street from Detroit.

    Sean D has the financial industry’s position pegged perfectly. However, the government’s position is worth illuminating:

    Four Reasons It Was Worth Bailing Out AIG But Not GM:

    1. No help until those overpaid grease balls in the UAW make painful concessions. They have dirt under their fingernails and make $80K a year? What is the world coming to?
    2. GM bond holders should suck it up and lose most of their investment. After all, it’s not like they had GOOD investments, like the Goldman Sachs CDS related paper at AIG. Those were clearly worth $150 billion to bail out.
    3. GM has been poorly managed. Not like Wall Street. Just look at how clever they were at masking risk with securitization. Those boys took home some good paychecks off that scam, let me tell you.
    4. If Wall Street is thrown out of work, many outstanding traders will be on the street! We can’t have that. But if the American car industry tanks, nobody will even notice the impact on employment.

blog comments powered by Disqus