George Siguler says his private equity colleagues have a (very bad) thing or two coming to them

So I was sitting there at the Buyouts East private equity conference today, listening to a discussion on “Trudging Through the Credit Winter.” It was a bunch of mid-career guys—mostly from PE firms but also a lawyer and a couple of lenders—talking about how it’s really tough out there but they’re coming up with creative ways to do deals and these trying times will eventually pass. My favorite quote was from Phil Canfield, a principal at PE firm GTCR: “I think there will be financial institutions five years from now.” Good to know!

Anyway, the tone was somewhat encouraging. It’s at times like these that private equity firms most obviously serve a useful economic purpose, I was thinking. Good on them—even if they don’t deserve that tax break.

Then the mid-career guys wrapped up their panel discussion and went back to their seats, and this Old Testament prophet walked up on stage. His name was George Siguler, and he’s co-founder of the “multi-strategy” private equity firm Siguler & Guff. I’d never heard of him before, but he’s had his hands in all sorts of interesting things over the years. He was a founding partner of the Harvard Management Co., which runs Harvard’s huge endowment, in the 1970s. He worked in the Reagan administration. He’s got lots of experience with the venture capital business. He had big investments in Russia in the late 1990s. He even invested in John Paulson’s now-famous fund that correctly bet on the subprime mortgage meltdown in 2007—although he said he didn’t invest nearly as much as he should have.

Anyway, Siguler  started off by saying that the previous panel discussion had reminded him of similar discussions at venture capital events in 2001. The VCs all talked about how we were going through a healthy post-bubble correction, and things would soon get back to normal. “Nine years later there’s still no venture capital industry to speak of,” Siguler said. “The average venture capital deal burns $75 million to create $40 million.”

In private equity, he went on, “there’s still this notion that things will go back to normal.” They won’t.

By this time I was frantically taking notes. I really couldn’t keep up, but here are at least a few excerpts from the Book of George:

“This AIG circumstance ought to be a lesson to everybody in this room. There’s a big portion of America who doesn’t think very highly of us, and some of it for good cause.”

“When you look at the wealth destruction and the $18 billion paid in Wall Street bonuses, it’s just out of whack.” There are lots of people in Detroit and all over America (I’m paraphrasing from memory here) who work just as hard as people on Wall Street and didn’t happen to be lucky enough to get into a business that paid insanely well. “People making $150,000 a year at the Treasury Department are trying to bail us out of our problems, and they’re working hard.”

On private equity: “We’re a fiduciary. We have the obligation to increase the wealth of our clients. That’s just been lost.”

“The only time the private equity industry adds value is in deals done during and coming out of a recession.” But that’s not going to help any fund that has already invested its money. “If it’s 70% invested today, it’s toast.”

“$1 trillion in high-yield paper [much of it financing private equity deals] is going to mature in the next four years. Where’s that cash going to come from?”

“The available universe of companies that buyouts can buy are essentially mediocre companies, and mediocre companies are going to have a much tougher time” in the economic climate of the next few years. The really good deals right now are in brand-name publicly traded companies that any investor can buy. “We will never see great companies at this price again in our lifetimes.” Private equity firms are “paying 8x multiples for tertiary mid-market companies and Boeing, a duopoly whose major competitor is run by the French government, is selling for ten times earnings.”

“The ideal investment in the world is an unregulated, life-essential monopoly. Secondary and tertiary players are going to have a much harder time, and those are the usual targets of LBOs.”

“China is a lot closer to working its way out of this than the Western press tells us.” Brazil and India are doing fine too. “Eastern Europe is a basket case. They don’t really have any competitive advantage.”

“We’re just beginning the crisis in commercial real estate. This cycle will be worse that the early-1990s RTC cycle.” As a result, lots of community banks will fail. “Banks are no longer very diversified. Securitization took credit cards and consumer mortgages off their balance sheets. Look at bank balance sheets and they’re very heavily invested in commercial real estate and construction loans.”

After the talk, I went up to Siguler and said he’d made me feel halfway good about working in the media business, meaning that he made private equity sound at least as messed up as magazines. He of course responded with a barrage of reasons why media companies are toast. Great!

Update: Here’s another account of the same talk.

Related Topics: Wall Street & Markets
  • Latest on Business

    Don Emmert / Getty Images

    Apple Now Worth More Than Microsoft, Google Combined

    How high can Apple soar? The tech juggernaut is closing in on $500 per share, a dramatic psychological threshold that underscores the company’s stunning performance over the last decade. How massive has Apple become? It’s now worth more by market capitalization than Google and Microsoft combined. The company’s latest stock price surge is being fueled by rumors that a new version of the iPad — the iPad 3 — will appear next month.

    Chipotle Is AppleSlate

    Photo-Illustration by Alexander Ho for TIME; Getty Images

    After Motorola Deal Approval, Can Google Hardware Be Far Behind?

    Now that federal regulators appear poised to approve Google’s $12.5 billion purchase of Motorola Mobility, speculation is mounting about what the Internet giant will do with its newly acquired assets. And what assets they are. Once the deal is formally approved — an announcement could come next week, according to multiple reports — Google will be in possession of some 17,000 patents related to mobile phone technology. And it will be well-situated to enter the hardware business, which could mean that consumers will soon see Google-branded phones and home entertainment devices.

  • pneogy

    Justin, I am intrigued by Siguler’s assertion that Brazil, China and India are doing better than expected. Is this true? And if so, is there a lesson here for us regarding which regulations might be helpful, and how?

  • banzai7

    Brazil China and India have two important advantages. First, a huge population able to sustain an internal economy some what independently. Second and most importantly, a financial services industry that has not been polluted with Wall Street alchemy, yet….

  • umeshgeeta

    It is surprise that even two readers showed interest in knowing how and why China, India & Brazil are doing okay. It is better than none, only if our Media honchos give more attention here.

    The simple answer is ‘domestic demand’ and ‘demography’. Average age in India is around 28. What do you do at 28? Procreate and work harder to protect financially life of your kids and yourself. That is what is happening in India. Domestic demand is solid and simply not going to go away because of recession.

    Debts are controlled in these countries (specifically China). India nationalized almost all of banks 3 decades back. Not that it does not have problems (politicization of loan advances); but it kind of insulated India from CDOs and toxic assets.
    There is something to know about these countries. Bad is IMF on behalf of America have been advising these and other countries and as China says ‘teacher has some explaining to do’ here. Will Americans and American Congress ever undertake prescriptions of IMF in these circumstances? Never. Primarily, the prescription will be ‘public debt de-leveraging’. Our Eric Cantor from GOP is the only one ready for such ‘debt less life’. But even there GOP leader Bush’s track record is there for all to see.

    It means we do not live without ‘debt’ in this country. (What man, even our beloved Jefferson could never pay his debt in his life time. ‘America and debt’, these are synonymous for ever.) Then the question is, going forward whatever debt we are incurring, is it ‘good debt or bad debt’? Just because Christina Romer says ‘private guys are good guys’ does not mean all the debt which Uncle Sam is racking up in handing over those bundles to Private Equity guys in order to shore up our banks in PPIP program is any good.

  • http://sportsworld.wordpress.com/ P

    @pneogy:

    I cannot talk about China and Brazil as for India –

    http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/20/business/20nocera.html

    Full disclosure – I have always never been a fan of the RBI – felt that they were too much into regulation. I guess I was proved wrong.

  • pneogy

    @P, Thanks for the helpful link to Joe Nocera’s article.

blog comments powered by Disqus