The uncertainty of stimulus

From a Congressional Budget Office estimate released today on the impact of some amendment or other to the Senate stimulus bill:

The macroeconomic impacts of any economic stimulus program are very uncertain. Economic theories differ in their predictions about the effectiveness of stimulus. Furthermore, large fiscal stimulus is rarely attempted, so it is difficult to distinguish among alternative estimates of how large the macroeconomic effects would be. For those reasons, some economists remain skeptical that there would be any significant effects, while others expect very large ones.

It’s sort of like that mutual fund boilerplate, “Past performance is no guarantee of future results.” Except that we’re not even sure of what the past performance was. (And I say this as somebody who thinks the stimulus legislation is on balance a good idea.)

Related Topics: Economy & Policy
  • Latest on Business

    LM Otero / AP

    Senate Approves Hike in Airline Security Fees

    (WASHINGTON) — A Democratic-controlled Senate panel Tuesday approved a $2.50 increase in airline security fees that would double the per-passenger fee for those taking nonstop flights.

    Why Greece Isn't Leaving the Eurozone YetSlate

    Associated Press

    Stocks Rally Further in Run-up to EU Summit

    MOSCOW — Global stocks enjoyed one of their best days in weeks on Tuesday ahead of a summit of European leaders that’s expected to be dominated by calls to boost economic growth.

    Europe remains the focus of attention across all financial markets in the run-up to the June 17 Greek election that could go a long way to determining the country’s membership of the euro as well as the future of the single currency zone.

  • bryanfromhouston

    Justin,
    -
    There might be an uncertainty in stimulus, but there is a Lehman-like certainty in not taking action when it is expected. I dare Congress to disappoint the global market again.

  • plukasiak

    Well, it looks like the CBO has fallen victim to “bi-partisan” disease. It used to be non-partisan; it didn’t matter where the idea came from, all that mattered was whether it worked. But “bi-partisanship” means keeping both sides equally happy, and so rather than rigorous analysis, we get this kind of slop.

  • bryanfromhouston

    pluk,
    -
    Further, they weren’t so uncertain last year about Bush’s plan for reinvigoration.

blog comments powered by Disqus