Will Tim Geithner Be Saved By the Apple Rule?

Tim Geithner’s confirmation hearing will be held Wednesday. The members of the Senate Finance Committee will ask him lots of tough questions about his tax forms and maybe even the financial bailouts he orchestrated as president of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. Some will raise their eyebrows disbelievingly at his answers. A few will say harsh things about his carelessness. Then they will vote to confirm him as Treasury Secretary. At least, that’s what everybody expects will happen.

Why is this? It’s partly that Geithner’s big mistake—failing to pay his Social Security and Medicare taxes while working for the International Monetary Fund earlier this decade—is apparently common among U.S. employees of international organizations. It may be partly because he’s a boy. But mainly it’s that the global financial system is showing signs of falling apart again and getting a strong, competent leader into the corner office at Treasury—pronto—has become something of a bipartisan national priority. Heck, I wouldn’t be surprised if Tuesday’s 5.28% fall in the S&P 500 just boosted Geithner’s likely approval margin by a few votes.

This reminds me a lot of what University of Illinois law professor Larry Ribstein has dubbed the Apple Rule. As Ribstein put it in January 2007:

It’s become clear by now that a major job for our legal system is trying to figure out a way that we can simultaneously (1) punish those greedy backdating wrongdoers; and (2) keep Steve Jobs out of jail.

Ribstein later defined the rule thusly:

The Apple Rule provides for an exception from corporate criminal liability when a popular business executive is accused of, or presides over a company that is accused of, misconduct. “Popular” is defined as “liked by journalists.”

That last part is incorrect. Journalists—at least the ones who’ve actually had to deal with Steve Jobs—don’t like him at all. But they, and everybody at the SEC and the Justice Department, were/are aware that Jobs might actually be that rarest of creatures: an indispensable CEO (we may be about to find out just how indispensable). And because Apple is a big, successful, beloved company, everybody involved was/is extremely wary of toppling its indispensable boss for an offense that, while real, doesn’t exactly threaten the foundations of our republic. They may also be afraid of getting swamped with angry e-mails from Macpsychos, but that strikes me as a side issue.

Which brings us to Geithner. He has more hands-on experience with financial crisis than anyone else on the planet (it’s not just the last two years; he was also Treasury’s point man during the emerging markets crises of the late 1990s). While the Three Bailout Musketeers of Geithner, Hank Paulson, and Ben Bernanke have been less than spectacularly successful in their recent efforts, one can hope that as the undisputed leader of the financial rescue Geithner would be capable of putting together a more coherent and definitive plan. And there’s the question of time: It would probably take weeks to get another candidate lined up, vetted and confirmed.

Put all that together, and what you probably get is our new Treasury Secretary, Tim Geithner.

Related Topics: Economy & Policy
  • Latest on Business

    Thomas Patterson / Statesman-Journal / AP

    The Bleak Unemployment Report: Is Europe to Blame?

    For the first time in almost a year, the unemployment rate rose to 8.2% in May as the economic recovery appeared to not only slow but almost completely stall. And it gets worse.

    The Jury Is Out on the EuroSlate

    Getty Images

    Smartphones of the Future: 6 Predictions

    Future mobile devices will change the way you do business–in ways you probably can’t even imagine. Here are a few predictions.

  • plukasiak

    I’m bothered by the fact that Geithner is so much in bed with Wall Street — as head of the New York Fed since 2003, where the “F” was he while all this crap was going on?
    _
    I’m especially worried that Geithner is sympathetic to screwing around with Social Security — Wall Street would love to get its hands on the Social Security trust, and Obama keeps making noises about “fixing” SS when it really isn’t broken (for instance, raising the minimum wage will increase SS tax receipts without resulting in significantly higher payouts down the road….) Do you know where Geithner stands on messing with Social Security?
    _
    And was geithner part of the cabal that cut Sheila Bair out of the bailout decision-making loop? Because she was about the only person in authority who cared more about homeowners than wall street fat cats, and is geithner played a role in shutting out Bair, then we need to find someone else pronto.
    _

  • tomlind

    Agreed that he will be confirmed. Time and circumstances play into that outcome. Let’s not forget, however, that the circumstances surrounding the non-payment of taxes went beyond a simple mistake. He received money to pay part of his self-employment taxes from the IMF, pocketed the funds and when audited and forced to pay back taxes, paid only the portion that were discovered to be in arrears by the IRS. He only paid the undiscovered back taxes when it became necessary in order to secure his appointment.

    Not a very attractive example of ethics. Yeah, it will slide by but Obama would have been better served by moving on as soon as this came up. Out here in fly-over country this one is choking even some of the Democrats I know.

  • curmudgeon57

    @tomlind: Agreed. And don’t forget that as Treasury Secretary, he will be in charge of the IRS. Leaves a bad taste in my mouth.
    -
    @plukasiak: “. . . the Social Security trust.” Ah, but if there only was such a beast. Recently my barber was regaling me with the fact that he believed that a lifetime of contributions to Social Security meant that he had a good $2 million waiting for him when he retired. Not wanting to argue with the man holding a razor to my throat, I declined to correct him.

  • http://www.simonvinkenoog.nl/beeld/Yogi%20-%20Annelies%20Rigter.jpg yogi

    “They may also be afraid of getting swamped with angry e-mails from Macpsychos, but that strikes me as a side issue.”
    -
    First off, they prefer to be called Macaholics or Mac Cultists (ala Wired’s old Cult of Mac subsection). And now they’ve probably been pretty watered down by all the hipsters and other pop-y people who have become apple fans now because they got an iPod nano for their birthday. ;-)

  • dadfox

    @plukasiak: Agree with you about fixing Social Security. Hopefully, Obama has enough other expertise on his economics team that they’ll realize the real problem is Medicare.

blog comments powered by Disqus