What, exactly, do lower mortgage rates get you?

Money magazine senior writer and Time.com snatch-away Stephen Gandel wrote a smart piece taking apart the Treasury Department’s sort-of-secret plan to bolster the housing market by driving down mortgage rates. Since the whole point of drumming up new buyers is to stabilize home prices, the part of the story I like most is the one that undermines that notion:

Some economist question whether the lower mortgage rates would even boost sales or home values. A 2006 study of mortgage rates and New York City housing prices going back to 1975 by Lucas Finco of Quadlet Consulting found no correlation between lower mortgage rates and higher housing prices, or vice versa. “The relationship between mortgage rates and home prices is pretty obscure,” says Jack Guttentag, a professor emeritus of finance at the Wharton School of Business.

James Hamilton, a professor of economics at the University of California, San Diego, says he used to think that lower mortgage rates were responsible for rising home sales in the first half of this decade, and for that reason he projected home prices would rebound in 2007. He now says rising home sales were the result of deterioration of lending standards and not lower mortgage rates. “I was wrong. The real story with home sales has to do with the availability of credit,” says Hamilton. “And credit is tight now.”

You can read the rest of the article here.

Barbara!

Related Topics: Economy & Policy
  • Latest on Business

    Thomas Patterson / Statesman-Journal / AP

    The Bleak Unemployment Report: Is Europe to Blame?

    For the first time in almost a year, the unemployment rate rose to 8.2% in May as the economic recovery appeared to not only slow but almost completely stall. And it gets worse.

    The Jury Is Out on the EuroSlate

    Getty Images

    Smartphones of the Future: 6 Predictions

    Future mobile devices will change the way you do business–in ways you probably can’t even imagine. Here are a few predictions.

  • plukasiak

    A 2006 study of mortgage rates and New York City housing prices going back to 1975
    .
    wow. given the bizarro-world nature of the New York City real estate market, why anyone would think that this study is in anyway meaningful is beyond me.

    On the whole, I do think its ridiculous for the government to pay to drop interest rates to raise home prices — 5.5% is a more than reasonable rate.

    The government should be figuring out ways to determine whether someone is mortgage worthy — the question of whether you pay your phone bill on time each month is irrelevant to whether you should be able to get a mortgage, and at what rate. Instead, what lenders should be prioritizing are things like employment records, down payment amount, net worth, and whether the price of the house is reasonable when compared to the price of rental housing.

    They key here is affordability — people who want to buy homes that they can easily afford should be able to get mortgages — one huge problem is that the real estate industry is set up to get people to spend the highest possible amount on a home, and sell people far more “house” than they need. If people were encouraged to buy only as little “house” as they need, we’d all be far better off.

  • Barbara Kiviat

    @plukasiak: I think you’re really going to like this guy: http://www.tumbleweedhouses.com/

  • plukasiak

    the best part is that there are apartments in New York City that make his house look like a McMansion ;)

blog comments powered by Disqus