Geithner gets Treasury

NBC is reporting that, in one of the least surprising choices of recent days, Barack Obama is going to tap Tim Geithner as Treasury Secretary. Former Treasury chief Larry Summers had been the subject of the most discussion in recent weeks, mainly because he’s said so many entertaining things through the years, but the actual betting was always on the more diplomatic, less controversial Geithner.

Geithner, 47, has been president of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York for the past five years. Before that he worked for a couple of years at the International Monetary Fund, and before that he was Larry Summers’ right-hand man at the Treasury Department. He and Summers remain close.

At the New York Fed, Geithner has been central to the efforts over the past year to keep the country’s financial system from collapsing. That means he’s been the point man in the controversial Fed-assisted sale of Bear Stearns and bailout of AIG, which will surely bring some pointed questions at his confirmation hearing. But given his bravura performance at the Senate Banking Committee hearing about the Bear Stearns deal in April, I’m betting he won’t have really major problems.

Markets seemed to like the choice a lot, with the Dow suddenly jumping about 200 points right after CNBC reported the news. Geithner is seen as extremely competent, he knows his way around the Treasury Department, and he’s already in regular contact with the current occupant of the job.

One thing Geithner doesn’t have much background in is economic policy other than financial policy (at Treasury his big job was jetting around the world fighting the emerging markets financial crises of the late 1990s). So the other names on the economic team that Obama is set to announce Monday are going to be important. They’re likely to be the ones designing a stimulus package while Geithner spends his days trying to make the banking system work again.

Update: Word is that Bill Richardson will be Commerce Secretary. I can’t recall any Commerce Secretary who has played a major role in shaping economic policy, though.

Update 2: The Dow ended the day up 494 points (it was down about 40 when the news broke). The Geithner rally! Can it continue? The Krugman rally didn’t.

Also, as I think about this more I realize that Geithner’s most important role at Treasury will be redoing the country’s (and possibly the world’s) financial regulatory set-up. He’s pretty well prepared to do that. Before the financial crisis began last year, he was on a crusade (a polite, Geithneresque crusade) to push for more transparency and “stress-testing” of hedge funds and in the credit default swap market. In a much-remarked upon speech in May 2007 he recited the usual Greenspan line about derivatives making the world less risky, then contemplated the possibility that while they perhaps reduced the risks of moderate financial shocks, they could make a significant financial crisis much, much worse:

This judgment, that systemic financial crises are less probable, but in the event they occur could be harder to manage, should be the principal preoccupation of market participants and policymakers today.

Uh, yes, I guess it should.

Update 3: Bloomberg says Summers will have “a senior White House role.”

Related Topics: Economy & Policy
  • Latest on Business

    LM Otero / AP

    Senate Approves Hike in Airline Security Fees

    (WASHINGTON) — A Democratic-controlled Senate panel Tuesday approved a $2.50 increase in airline security fees that would double the per-passenger fee for those taking nonstop flights.

    Why Greece Isn't Leaving the Eurozone YetSlate

    Associated Press

    Stocks Rally Further in Run-up to EU Summit

    MOSCOW — Global stocks enjoyed one of their best days in weeks on Tuesday ahead of a summit of European leaders that’s expected to be dominated by calls to boost economic growth.

    Europe remains the focus of attention across all financial markets in the run-up to the June 17 Greek election that could go a long way to determining the country’s membership of the euro as well as the future of the single currency zone.

  • pneogy

    “In a much-remarked upon speech in May 2007 he recited the usual Greenspan line about derivatives making the world less risky, then contemplated the possibility that while they perhaps reduced the risks of moderate financial shocks, they could make a significant financial crisis much, much worse.”

    Thank you, Mr. Geithner, for trying to warn us that hedging your bets the Hedge Fund way could lead to disaster.

  • plukasiak

    while you probably have more than enough material for the paperback version appendices, the rise of the stock markets upon the release of the ‘news’ that Geithner was going to be at treasury strikes me as one more example of market non-rationality. I mean, did they think that Obama was going to nominate Zippy the Pinhead?

  • dumdedumdum

    Justin, I am sometimes perplexed by comments that a particular cabinet nominee does not have specific types of experience. Each of these departments (and Treasury in particular) have large competent career civil service staffs that know how to do things and are empowered to do most of them. Geithner is probably a quick study and in this instance having someone take over at Treasury who is generally capable and well regarded but also has intimate familiarity with both the generalities and the specifics of the current mess is an ideal choice I think.

  • http://www.inworldstudios.com jayackroyd

    Justin–
    .
    Citi commentary?

  • donthelibertariandemocrat

    My main problem was that he hired M.Alix, which seemed like failing up. However, I’m about to read the speech you posted, and I read a post he did in June in the FT, which impressed me.

  • Justin Fox

    @dumdedumdum: All I’m saying is that there’s likely to be a division of labor with Treasury focusing on financial stuff (there’s enough of that to worry about) and the White House economic team charged with putting together the Obama economic plan. That’s the way it usually works, but there have been times–such as during the Rubin years, the Mellon years, and I guess the Paulson years–when Treasury dominated all economic policy.

    @jayackroyd: Yeah, sometime soon.

blog comments powered by Disqus