The shocking disappearance of 0.38% of American jobs

A whopping 0.38% of American nonfarm jobs disappeared in September and October, the Labor Department announced today.

What? That doesn’t sound whopping? It’s 524,000 jobs, which amounts to a lot of people’s livelihoods lost and financial security dashed. But it’s still just a tiny share of those employed in this country, estimated at 136,899,000 in October. And by the standards of past recessions, it’s not that big a drop–there were more severe slides in employment in 2001 and 1991, and significantly more severe ones in 1981 and 1982.

This could just be the beginning of a much worse employment decline, of course. Since the beginning of this year, payroll employment is down a total of 0.85%. Between July 1981 and December 1982, employment shrank by 3.1%. But even that 3.1% figure is a reminder that economic downturns (and economic upturns) play out mainly on the margins. The vast majority of workers remain employed–and will remain employed even if the recession deepens. Barring an unraveling of the financial system, they will eventually get back to spending at a healthier pace than in the scary month of October.

Related Topics: Economy & Policy
  • Latest on Business

    Photo-Illustration by Alexander Ho for TIME; Getty Images

    After Motorola Deal Approval, Can Google Hardware Be Far Behind?

    Now that federal regulators appear poised to approve Google’s $12.5 billion purchase of Motorola Mobility, speculation is mounting about what the Internet giant will do with its newly acquired assets. And what assets they are. Once the deal is formally approved — an announcement could come next week, according to multiple reports — Google will be in possession of some 17,000 patents related to mobile phone technology. And it will be well-situated to enter the hardware business, which could mean that consumers will soon see Google-branded phones and home entertainment devices.

    Ben Bernanke Is Wrong About Debt and Interest RatesSlate

    REUTERS/Jeff Haynes

    Three Cheers and Three Jeers for $25 Billion Foreclosure Settlement

    A key step was taken yesterday in moving the country beyond the housing crisis, a crisis that triggered the worst recession in decades and whose lingering effects continue to hinder the nation’s nascent recovery. The deal, which brought together 49 state attorneys general and the Justice Department, was a large-scale compromise between states, the federal government, two political parties and the nation’s largest financial institutions. Given the number of players at the bargaining table, it’s no surprise that this isn’t a deal made in heaven. There are significant shortcomings, and critics have already offered legitimate reasons why the deal will not turn the housing market around or even serve justice to those parties that committed fraud and broke the law. At the same time, the settlement will offer real relief to homeowners across the country, and it lays the groundwork for sane regulation of servicer conduct.

  • yogi

    Justin, I have a newbie question, when they report the jobs cut are they taking into account of actual jobs lost or just the announced layoffs by companies? Example, Ford just announced 2600 job cuts. Would that be included into the next jobs report for Nov. even though nobody has officially lost their job yet and it will probably take some time before Ford decides which employees to layoff?

  • curmudgeon57

    Justin, you’re right, and to be honest, from my vantage point I don’t even see much of a recession. However, let me offer a few mitigating circumstances. First, even a small percentage of job loss is painful, and has a ripple effect across the economy over time.

    Second, it’s not just job loss this time. The combined loss of asset value (mostly homes, but also stocks) obliquely adds to the feeling of being poor and not in control.

    Third, the credit freeze is preventing those with job loss from turning to credit cards (and home equity loans if applicable) from buffering themselves against the prospect of running out of money. Of course, they may have been highly leveraged to begin with, a practice that became far more socially acceptable in this decade than in the past.

    It adds up to possibly being worse than simply the loss of a small percentage of jobs. While it’s difficult to find sympathy for a group that let themselves become overextended in the aggregrate, it is much easier to feel for them on an individual basis.

  • Justin Fox

    @yogi: No, just announcing a layoff has no impact on the monthly jobs report. Only actual jobs losses show up (or at least estimated actual job losses).

    The monthly employment report is based on two surveys. The payroll numbers, which I cite above, come from the establishment survey of about 150,000 businesses and government agencies. That covers about 1/3 of the nonfarm workforce, and BLS extrapolates its numbers from that.

    The unemployment rate, meanwhile, is calculated from a survey of about 60,000 households. So it’s a much smaller sample size. But it can catch jobs (self-employed, small businesses, new companies, etc.) that the establishment survey misses.

  • tanboontee

    This is only a relatively mild shock. It is just the very beginning of something far more drastic and dreadful.

    The first casualty of recession always falls on employment. As the unemployment rate in the US now shoots up to almost 6.5%, one can try to imagine the awful consequences, especially in the coming year. Yes, there had been bad times in the past, but this time the penalty to be paid by the generally innocent public is going to be definitely beyond common comprehension.

    Unemployment worsens recession which in turn causes more unemployment. And the vicious circle continues to lower the standard of living of most people — nly then can things get better gradually.

    Be prepared for a worse scenario, VERY MUCH WORSE.
    (Tan Boon Tee)

blog comments powered by Disqus