Will the housing bill save America?

The Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008 is headed for President Bush’s desk. He’s planning to sign it. Will it stop the housing crash in its tracks and avert recession? Probably not. Will it keep things from getting worse than they otherwise would? Probably. Is it full of lots of junk that won’t do much good at all? Almost certainly. Will it be the last major legislation aimed at dealing with our current housing/financial crisis? Almost certainly not.

After a convoluted voyage from the House to the Senate to the House to the Senate to the House to the Senate, the bill totaled 694 pages. (Seriously, you can download it for yourself.)

The bill started life as a plan, dreamed up by Democrats Barney Frank and Chris Dodd, to use up to $300 billion in Federal Housing Administration guarantees to lure lenders into renegotiating troubled mortgage loans. Actually, that’s not quite right. H.R. 3221 started life last summer as the New Direction for Energy Independence, National Security, and Consumer Protection Act. Its functions got folded into omnibus energy legislation signed into law by the president in December, but Senate leaders decided in April to replace the text of the bill–which had already been approved by both the House and Senate, and thus could bypass pesky committee hearings–with legislation to “modernize” the FHA. Then, in May, the House added the mortgage renegotiation plan and legislation to create a new, stronger regulator of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, among some other things. Then the Senate okayed the bill again with some changes of its own on July 11.

Then came the Fannie-Freddie scare, the declarations by the Fed and Treasury that they would back the two mortgage lenders up if things got worse, and the need for Congressional action to back up Treasury’s promise. Which brings us to the giant of a bill that the House passed last Wednesday and the Senate Saturday morning. It gives Treasury permission to back Fannie and Freddie with a line of credit restricted only by the overall U.S. debt limit, and to take equity stakes in the companies if necessary. It creates a new, more powerful regulator for the two companies. It puts up to $300 billion in FHA backing behind an ambitious mortgage-renegotiation plan. It gives local governments $4 billion to buy up foreclosed properties. It gives many first-time homebuyers a $7,500 tax break. That, and a bunch of other stuff too.

The one part of the bill I’ve spent much time looking at–the Dodd-Frank FHA-mortgage-renegotiation plan–appears to be a pretty reasonable effort to balance the needs of taxpayers, struggling homeowners, and mortgage lenders. The lenders do seem to get the best of the deal, but the whole point is to lure them into restructuring loans that they would otherwise foreclose upon, so that was probably inevitable. The bigger issue may be that it could take months and months just to get the program up and running.

Then there’s the Fannie-Freddie backstop. Whatever their flaws, the two government-sponsored enterprises are for the moment about the only things keeping the mortgage market going. Something had to be done to help them. But even the promise of massive taxpayer aid wasn’t enough to keep interest rates on the mortgages they buy from rising sharply.

To sum up: 694 pages. Multiple major spending and regulatory initiatives. Doubts about when they’ll actually take effect, and how much impact they’ll have. No clear vision of what the future of housing and financial regulation in this country is going to look like. This legislation is but a muddled beginning.

Related Topics: Economy & Policy
  • Latest on Business

    Associated Press

    Apple CEO Cook Gives Up $75M in Stock Dividends

    NEW YORK — Apple CEO Tim Cook is giving up $75 million in dividends on restricted stock that the company is awarding to all of its employees.

    In a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission on Thursday, Apple Inc. said that Cook requested that his restricted stock units not receive dividends. The dividends that Apple workers are getting amount to $2.65 per quarter for each restricted stock unit held. The shares are not normally eligible to receive dividends, so Apple’s decision is a perk for its employees.

    The Bomb Hidden in Mitt Romney's Education PlanSlate

    Associated Press

    Study: Typical CEO Pay Up 6% to $9.6 Million

    NEW YORK — Profits at big U.S. companies broke records last year, and so did pay for CEOs.

    The head of a typical public company made $9.6 million in 2011, according to an analysis by The Associated Press using data from Equilar, an executive pay research firm.

  • Bryan from Houston

    In a word, as I stated in my comment below regarding your post on Gross and deleveraging…this bill is a day late and a dollar short.

    It has come at a time when it is too late to prevent what is already a forceclosure cycle that is about half-way over with already. In addition, it does not make the real changes which would give markets confidence to invest in Fannie/Freddie and the US housing market.

    For example, does anyone seriously believe that raising downpayments to 3.5% will provide that confidence even if it eliminates downpayment assistance. It represents that we have a failed savings rate if anything. Why not have a multi-year plan to increase that number to 5%?

    As well, let’s focus on why those interest rates are going up? It is because creditors fear that the debtor will not be able to render repayment in full or a timely manner. In the US case, we have massive over-hanging trade deficits, swelling government expenditures, inflation seemingly unchecked by the fed, and are gridlocked out of a coherent energy policy which will transfer roughly (very rough estimate) $1 trillion out of economy over time. Interest rates should be up! And way up!
    This legislation is nothing more than a smoke screen. The only thing even marginally worthwhile is that the government will provide assistance in taking up some slack from the housing market by helping buy and fix-up abandoned properties because banks can’t, won’t and if they are true to their stockholders shouldn’t become involved in housing.

    This bill will however give folks confidence that Congress is still in session…even if it appears lethargically. This current situation also proves that it is dangerous for the country to face crisis in an election year. The amount of postering and positioning is almost heart-breaking.

  • Dad

    But fortunately, by October the worst of the housing debacle will be over. Most foreclosures will have occurred and life as we know it will be on the upswing.

  • Independent

    “To sum up: 694 pages. Multiple major spending and regulatory initiatives. Doubts about when they’ll actually take effect, and how much impact they’ll have. No clear vision of what the future of housing and financial regulation in this country is going to look like. This legislation is but a muddled beginning.”

    Great sum up. As an eminent economist once said “Prevention is better than cure.” What are we doing on the prevention front?

blog comments powered by Disqus