Financial crises are more fun when they involve companies with goofy names like Fannie and Freddie

By wpcomimportuser1 | July 11, 2008 | +

I’ve just churned out a quickie Fannie-Freddie analysis for Time.com. Here’s how it starts:

All debt issued by mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac comes with a prominent disclaimer: “Not guaranteed by the United States.” But the business model of both companies, not to mention the continued functioning of the U.S. mortgage market, depends on nobody quite believing that disclaimer. Wrap your head around that contradiction, and you’re well on your way to understanding the Fannie-Freddie drama currently gripping U.S. markets.

Anyway, go read it, if you’re into that kind of stuff. Then come back and tell me if I’ve gotten it all wrong.

Update: Ha! Newsweek‘s Dan Gross had to write a quickie online Fannie/Freddie explainer too!

Related Topics: Economy & Policy

@TIMEBusiness

Latest on Business

Apple May 25, 2012

Apple CEO Cook Gives Up $75M in Stock Dividends

NEW YORK — Apple CEO Tim Cook is giving up $75 million in dividends on restricted stock that the company is awarding to all of its employees.

In a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission on Thursday, Apple Inc. said that Cook requested that his restricted stock units not receive dividends. The dividends that Apple workers are getting amount to $2.65 per quarter for each restricted stock unit held. The shares are not normally eligible to receive dividends, so Apple’s decision is a perk for its employees.
From our Partners
The Bomb Hidden in Mitt Romney's Education PlanSlate

The Richest Woman in the World: How Gina Rinehart Earns her BillionsDaily Finance
Why Dell Will Never Be Great AgainHuff Post Business
Economy May 25, 2012

Study: Typical CEO Pay Up 6% to $9.6 Million

NEW YORK — Profits at big U.S. companies broke records last year, and so did pay for CEOs.

The head of a typical public company made $9.6 million in 2011, according to an analysis by The Associated Press using data from Equilar, an executive pay research firm.

Florida

Just a quick read through of it, Justin, and it looks like you sum things up pretty well. You should go into more detail about the decision to allow Fannie and Freddy to start wading into the jumbo market. Hank Paulson lobbied for that, didn’t he? I remember seeing red lights going off mentally at the time.
Independent

“Ely also thinks that Fannie’s and Freddie’s charmed existence as private enterprises with tacit government backing can’t continue. “What all this bailout talk does is blow away the notion that there’s an ‘implicit’ guarantee. There is a guarantee, or there isn’t.”

It seems to me that, apart from the previous accounting scandals and the outsized CEO compensation packages that you mentioned, Fannie and Freddie basically did what they are supposed to do. Their current plight is the result of the crisis in the overall home mortgage market, rather than their own transgressions. Without Fannie and Freddie the crisis would have been much worse.